Advanced Search Results
Prabhakar Bhaskar Vs. Usha Prabhakar
Mumbai
Jul-18-1952
Family
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 96; Bombay Hindu Divorce Act, 1947 - Sections 5, 5A, 8 and 13; Bombay Matrimonial (Transfer of Cases) Act, 1950; Bombay Civil Courts Act, 1869 - Sections 2, 8, 16, 17 and 26; Bombay Civil Courts (Amendment) Act, 1949 - Sections 6
AIR1953Bom189; (1953)55BOMLR59; ILR1953Bom323
Court under the provisions of Section 8, Bombay Civil Courts Act of 1869.[4] Under Section 5, Bombay Hindu Divorce Act of 1917, every suit under the Act has to be instituted in the Court within the limits of … lay direct to the High Court.It is quite true that this Court was then considering the effect of Section 6 of the Amending Act 54 of 1949, which provided for the continuance of the proceedings and for the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskA. Vs. B.
Mumbai
Aug-21-1992
Family
Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 3(3), 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 17, 18, 19 and 20
I(1994)DMC238
ORDERTipnis, J.1. This is a reference under Section 20 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869 for confirmation of the decree of nullity passed by the learned District Judge, Thane.2. The petitioner-husband filed M. … The Division Bench thereafter making a detailed reference to the various provisions of the Act mainly Ss. 4, 6, 7 and 8 and also to clause 35 of the Letters Patent of 1865, held in para 8
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMonika Sanctis Vs. Henry Joseph and anr.
Karnataka
Dec-17-2002
Family
Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 10, 14, 16 and 17; Family Courts Act, 1984 - Sections 19
ILR2004KAR2081; 2003(2)KarLJ588
between the parties had been dissolved. However, we had referred to the provisions of Section 16 of the Divorce Act, 1869 in the last para of the judgment and had indicated that the decree of nisi for divorce can … matter stood thus, she had received a letter on 15-1-1998 from one Vincent Nazarat (marked as Ex. P. 6) and she was informed that her husband was living in adultery with the said Nazarat's wife and that
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Kuruvilla Varghese Vs. Sapnam Elizabeth Joseph
Kerala
May-25-2007
Family
Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 10, 10(1), 14 and 16; Indian Divorce (Amendment) Act, 2001; Hindu Marriage Act - Sections 23(1)
AIR2007Ker240
The Indian Divorce (Amendment) Act, 2001, Act 51 of 2001 by the substitution of Section 10 of the Divorce Act, 1869) is liable to be dismissed on the ground that the petition was filed twelve years after the marrjage … Twelve years of my precious life has been wasted. If he had agreed to nullify the marriage within 6 days of marriage, my folk would have got me married within six months. Since the petitioner wanted me
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskYouth Welfare Federation Rep. by Its Chairman, K.J. Prasad Vs. Union o ...
Andhra Pradesh
Oct-09-1996
Constitution
Indian Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 2, 10, 22 and 26; Constitution of India - Articles 13, 13(1), 13(2), 13(3), 14, 15 , 19(2) to 19(6), 21, 44, 141, 366, 366(10), 372, 372(1), 372(2), 372(3) and 395; Personal Law; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 292 and 293; Administrative Law; Constitutional Law; Indian Divorce (Amendment) Act, 1927; Indian Divorce (Amendment) Act, 1948; Indian Divorce (Amendment) Act, 1950; Indian Divorce (Amendment) Act, 1912; Indian Divorce (Amendment) Act, 1926; Indian Divorce (Amendment) Act, 1951; Indian Independence Act, 1947 - Schedule - Article 395; International Law; National Law
1996(4)ALT1138
this Bench in the context of consideration of the vires of Sections 10 and 22 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act.').2. W.P. No. 9717 of 1983 was filed as public interest litigation raising … perplexing in nature have teen referred to this Bench in the context of consideration of the vires of Sections 10 and 22 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act.').2. W.P. No. 9717 … The validity of Madras Hindu (Bigamy Prevention and Divorce) Act, 1949 (Act 6 of 1949) was discussed by the Madras High Court in Srinivasa Aiyar
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVincent Joseph Konath and Etc. Vs. Jacintha Angela Vincent Konath and ...
Mumbai
Oct-13-1993
Family
Foreign Marriage Act, 1969 - Sections 18(1) and (4); Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 2; Family Courts Act, 1984 - Sections 7 and 8; Bombay High Court Rules - Rule 131; Special Marriage Act, 1954
AIR1994Bom120; 1994(1)MhLj477
to interpret Ss. 18(1) and 18(4) of the Foreign Marriage Act 1969 and S. 2 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869 and consider as to whether this Honourable Court has jurisdiction to entertain this suit. The Prothonotary and Senior … said averments are presumed to be correct for the time being and for the purpose of this reference.6. Section 18(1) of the Foreign Marriage Act 1969 provides that the provisions of Chapter IV, V, VI and VII
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNina Dalal Vs. Merwanji Pheeozshaw Dalal
Mumbai
Apr-11-1930
Family
(1930)32BOMLR1046
Christians but only one, and that, consequently, the jurisdiction given or continued to this Court by the Indian Divorce Act 1869, as subsequently amended, does not apply.2. As regards the facts, it is sufficient to say that the lady … and Letters Patent already mentioned. In this connection we have been referred to the Matrimonial Causes Act 1857, Section 6, which specifically refers to this particular jurisdiction of the old Ecclesiastical Courts. It runs:-As soon as this Act
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askivan Erasmus Vs. Mrs. Zena Erasmus
Allahabad
Jan-11-1982
Family
Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 36 and 41; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 24 and 26; Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 - Rule 6
AIR1982All194
lite to the respondent wife at the rate of Rs. 600 per month under Section 36 of the Divorce Act, 1869 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') in a suit for divorce instituted by the appellant against the respondent. … the IVth Add), District Judge, Allahabad awardingmaintenance pendente lite to the respondent wife at the rate of Rs. 600 per month under Section 36 of the Divorce Act, 1869 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') in a
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGeorge Sebastian Alias Joy Vs. Molly Joseph Alias Nish
Kerala
Jul-20-1994
Family
Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 18 and 19; Canon Law; Statutory Law
AIR1995Ker16; II(1995)DMC168
in the absence of a decree passed by the civil court in the manner provided in the Indian Divorce Act, 1869 (for short 'the Divorce Act') the former marriage continued in spite of the annulment order passed by the … District Judge passed the decree declaring the present marriage null and void as for the ground envisaged in Section 19(4) of the Divorce Act.6. No doubt, as per Section 45 of the Divorce Act, the proceedings thereunder
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAshok Ratti Lal Trivedi Vs. Anjani Madhusudan Oza
Delhi
May-16-1967
Family
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 25
4(1968)DLT235
page 290.) In this context it is useful to refer to sections 37 and 37 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869- 36.Alimony fendente lite -In any suit under this Act, whether it be instituted by a husband or a … M.M. Ismail, J.(1) This Civil revision petition filed under section 115, Civil Procedure Code, raises an important question regarding the construction of section 25 of the. Hindu Marriage … '36.Alimony pendent lite There in any proceedings under Chapter v or Chapter Vi it appears to the District Court that the wife, has no independent
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »