Advanced Search Results

Vadde Rama Rao Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 304-B, 494, 495, 497 and 498; Indian Divorce Act, 1869; Evidence Act - Sections 50; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161

Reported in : 1990CriLJ1666

Criminal - dowry death - Sections 304-B, 494, 495, 497 and 498 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Divorce Act, 1869, Section 50 of Indian Evidence Act and Section 161 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - appellant accused charged with offence

Peter Philip Saldanha and ors. Vs. Anne Grace Saldanha

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : 124Ind.Cas.776

jurisdiction in this suit to pass a decree for restitution of conjugal rights. Section 32 of the Indian Divorce Act of ,1869 requires an application for restitution of conjugal rights to be made by petition, and except upon … (Co. Litt. 132b, referred to by Gorell Barnes P. in Chetti v. Chetti (1909) P. 67 : 78 L.J.P. 23 : 99 L.T. 885 : 53 S.J. 163 : 25 T.L.R. 146. The Treaty of Cession, though

Meesarapu Mary Ratnam Vs. Measarapu Babu Rao

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Family

Acts : Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 10, 17, 50 and 55

Reported in : AIR1985AP340

which comes up before us on a reference by the District Judge under S. 17 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869 (Act IV of 1869), hereinafter referred to as 'the Act', a question of considerable importance and frequent occurrence … by a District Judge shall be subject to confirmation by the High Court. The next relevant section is section 50 which provides that every petition under the Act shall be served on the party to be affected thereby,

David Alias Balasaheb Sunderrao Takalkar Vs. Kalpana Alias Mai Alias V ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Reported in : (1976)78BOMLR85

It is mainly the case of the petitioner that the petition is under Section 18 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869 for marriage being declared null and void and it is urged that Section 19 provides the grounds on … [1974] A.I.R. Myrs. 61. George v. Jaya [1965] 2 Myrs. L.J. 383. Ramesh Saraiya v. Kusum Madgaokar (1948) 50 Bom. L.R. 426. Aykut v. [1940] A.I.R. Cal. 75 Bimla Bai v. Shankerlal [1959] A.I.R. M.P. 8. Vermani

Premchand Hira Vs. Bai Galal

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Reported in : AIR1927Bom594; (1927)29BOMLR1336

to prove that one or both of the parties were Christians. Further, under Section 2 of the Indian Divorce Act 1869, it is essential to prove that the petitioner professed the Christian religion at the date of presenting the … the Indian Divorce Act. In a case from Poona not long ago Walsh v. Walsh, (1926) 29 Bom L.R. 308 we had to send the case back no less than twice for remands in order to have

Caroline Perpetua Eardley Vs. Glenn B. Eardley and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Family

Acts : Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 36

Reported in : II(2002)DMC34; ILR2002KAR1618; 2002(2)KarLJ509

(Senior Division) and Principal Judicial Magistrate First Class, K.G.F., on an application under Section 36 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869 seeking interim maintenance for the petitioner-wife. The application has by the said order been dismissed on the ground … from the same. He was, according to the application, the owner of a building worth more than Rs. 50 lakhs, besides a Toyota car valuing more than Rs. 12 lakhs. The wife alleged that she had no

Ramesh Ramanlal Saraiya Vs. Kusum Madgaokar

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Reported in : AIR1949Bom1; (1948)50BOMLR426

alimony to wife.;The Court which passes a decree for nullity of marriage, under Section 19 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869, has also jurisdiction, under Section 7 of the Act, to grant permanent alimony to the wife. The omission … Bar. There is a very old case as old as 1870 in Abbott v. Abbott (1868) 4 Beng. L.R. 51 where Mr. Justice Macpherson had to consider the effect of Section 7. The question there was with

John over Vs. Muriel A.i. over

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Reported in : (1925)27BOMLR251

The sole jurisdiction of the District Court to dissolve Christian marriages is to be found in the Indian Divorce Act, 1869, and it is incumbent on the Court strictly to follow the statutory directions therein given. The District Court … in her letters-Extreme caution before granting divorce-Indian Evidence Act (I of 1872), Section 58-Indian Divorce Act (IV of 1869), Section 10.;The Court will not grant a decree on the petition by a husband on the ground of the … cases like the present. 7. In Williams v. Williams and Padfield (1865) L. R. 1 P. & D. 29 with reference to the case, it

Capt. Suprabha Joel Gaikwad Vs. Dr. Joel Soloman Gaikwad

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Acts : Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 18, 19(1)(20) and 20

Reported in : AIR1997Bom171; 1997(2)BomCR403; I(1997)DMC306

dismissed the petition filed by the Appellant-wife for dissolution of marriage under Sections 18 and 19 of Indian Divorce Act, 1869, more particularly, on the ground that the respondent-husband was impotent at the time of marriage and at the … decree, the Family Court at Pune dismissed the petition filed by the Appellant-wife for dissolution of marriage under Sections 18 and 19 of Indian Divorce Act, 1869, more particularly, on the ground that the respondent-husband was impotent … ORDERM. L. DUDHAT, J.1. This first appeal is filed against the judgment and decree

Jordan Diengdoh Vs. Swaranjeet Singh Chopra

Court : Delhi

Subject : Family

Acts : Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 19(1); Christian Marriage Act, 1872 - Sections 4

Reported in : ILR1984Delhi14; 1984RLR595

husband and wife.(3) The prevent petition has been filed under Ss. 18, 19 and 22 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869. Under S. 18, any husband or wife may present a petition praying that his or her marriage may … the intended marriage postulated by S. 38 of the Act did not comply with the requirements of that section, and further that the provisions of Ss. 41, 42 and 51 of the Act had been violated which