Advanced Search Results
David C. Arumainayagam Vs. Geetha C. Arumainayagam
Chennai
Nov-23-1994
Family
Indian Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 2, 10 and 39; Indian Christian Marriage Act, 1872 - Sections 2; Indian Christian Marriage (Amendment) Act, 1926; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 13
I(1995)DMC418
before Court for passing appropriate orders thereon. Family - divorce - Sections 2, 10 and 39 of Indian Divorce Act, 1869 - application for direction to respondent-wife to hand over and settle immovable property - marriage broken down and … however failed to place any material before the Court to substantiate his claim.4. The applicant however relying on Section 39 of the Indian Divorce Act, contends that the property belonging to the wife may be directed by the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMalza D. Shira Vs. Archana Marak and anr.
Guwahati
Mar-27-2003
Family
Indian Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 10, 15 and 39
The petitioner-husband Shri Malza D. Shira has filed a suit for divorce under Section 10 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869 (for short 'the Act'). It is alleged that Smti Archana Marak, the wife of the petitioner and Simon … of Miss Paul regarding directions for return of Annexure-I property to the respondent wife, we find that under Section 39 of the Act (later on omitted by Act 51 of 2001) (as it stand at relevant time), the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr. David Chakravarthy Arumainayagam and Another Vs. Geetha Chakravath ...
Chennai
Mar-18-2000
Family
Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 2, 10 and 39; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 13 - Order 14, Rule 2; Original Side Rules (High Court of Madras) - Order 14, Rule 8
II(2001)DMC276
from England where she is domiciled. k The respondent also filed an Application as 4438 of 1993 under section 39 of the Indian Divorce Act. He also filed O.A.No.107 of 1993 to restrain the applicant from alienating her … in the main original matrimonial suit. The respondent filed the main case under section 10 of the Indian Divorce Act. Even in para. 3 of the main petition, the respondent had conceded that the applicant is domiciled in
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
K. Binulal Vs. R.S. Roopa
Kerala
Aug-12-2011
Land Acquisition
2011(3)KLJ782; 2011(3)KLT933; 2011(3)ILR(Ker)836; 2011(3)KHC738
to that in Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955; Section 36 or 41 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869; Section 38 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954 or Section 39 of the Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHaseena Mansoor Vs. State of Kerala
Kerala
May-18-2010
Family
Guardian and Wards Act, 1890; ;Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Section 118; ;Divorce Act, 1869 - Section 10; ;Kerala Public Services Act, 1968 - Section 2(1); ;Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993 - Section 2; ;Mohammedan Law; ;Constitution of India - Articles 13, 13(1), 13(2), 13(3), 14, 15, 15(1), 15(3), 16(2), 21, 38, 38(1), 38(2), 39, 46, 51A and 309; ;Kerala Service Rules - Rule 118
2010(2)KLJ981
v. Union of India 1995(1) KLT 644 holding as unconstitutional, the apparent classification in Section 10 of the Divorce Act, 1869, effectively classifying the Christians as a lot, on the ground of religion, was also referred to.Submissions on behalf … and that the said provision is in violation of the public policy and constitutional mandate under Articles 38, 39, 46, 15 and 14 to accord social and economic democracy to women as assured in the Preamble to
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMahalingam Pillai Vs. Amsavalli
Chennai
Jan-03-1956
Family
(1956)2MLJ289
Marriage Act, 1954, corresponding to Section 6 of the Bombay Divorce Act, 1947, Section 36 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869, and Section 39 of the Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936, empowers the Court to grant alimony to
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMathew Varghese Vs. Rosamma Varghese
Kerala
Jul-09-2003
Family
Christian Law
AIR2003Ker312; 2003(4)CTC193; (2004)186CTR(Ker)172; I(2004)DMC148; 2003(3)KLT6
under Section 9 and Order 32-A of theCode of Civil Procedure. Sections 41 to 44 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869 recognize andregulate the right to maintenance. He further submitted that Section 23(2) of the HinduAdoptions and Maintenance Act, … it. How much more than will your father in Heaven give good things to those who ask Him'. 39. Does not the morality of the Bible embody the safety of the society? It lays down the way
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM. Vijaya Vs. Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Collieries Co. ...
Andhra Pradesh
Aug-29-2001
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 20, 21, 38, 39, 47 and 226; Bio-Medical Waste (Management and Handling) Rules, 1998; Epidemic Diseases Act, 1897; Epidemic Diseases (Amendment) Act, 1987; Andhra Pradesh Public Health Act, 1939 - Sections 52; Societies Registration Act; Drugs Control Act; Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 - Sections 10-A, 17(4) and 19(2); Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 24, 37, 38 and 39; Andhra Pradesh Prisons Rules, 1979 - Rules 583 to 653 and 1007 to 1014; Dissolution of Muslim Marriage Act, 1939 - Sections 2; Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936 - Sections 32; Indian Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 10; Hindu Marriage Act, 1956 - Sections 13; Special Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 27; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 269 and 270
I(2002)ACC32; 2002ACJ32; 2001(5)ALD522; 2001(5)ALT154
of Muslim Marriage Act, 1939, Section 32 of Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936, Section 10 of Indian Divorce Act, 1869, Section 13 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1956 and Section 27 of the Special Marriage Act, 1955 make incurable veneral … learned Counsel appearing on behalf of one of the interveners would submit that having regard to Articles 21, 39 and 47 of the Constitution of India, the problem should be considered in the light of the expanded
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Shahnaz Shaharyari Alias ShirIn Shaharyari, Nagpur Vs. Dr. Vijay ...
Mumbai
Apr-29-1994
Family
Guardians and Wards Act, 8 of 1890 - Sections 9; Family Courts Act, 66 of 1984 - Sections 7, 9 and 39; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 9, Order 21, Rule 22; Evidence Act, 1 of 1872 - Sections 114; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act - Sections 4(5), 6, 7, 8, 9, 17 and 25; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 125; Indian Divorce Act, 1869; Foreign Marriage Act, 1969 - Sections 18; Special Marriage Act, 1954 - Sections 24, and Sections 27(1)
AIR1995Bom30; 1996(1)BomCR473; (1996)96BOMLR678
is the Indian citizen while the petitioner is a resident of Iran. 21. The provisions of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869, are not applicable to the instantcase, because S. 2 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869, provides that the … in India from time to time.8. The respondent had instituted a suit before the District Judge, Nagpur, under Sections 6 and 8 of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act read with Sections 17 and 25 of the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRaja Gopalan Vs. Rajamma
Kerala
Jun-30-1966
FamilyCivil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 25(1) and 25(3)
AIR1967Ker181
learned Judge proceeds on the basis, that Section 25 follows more or less Section 37 of the Indian Divorce Act 1869 Act 4 of 1869; and the learned Judge notes only a difference that the Hindu Marriage Act imposes
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »