Advanced Search Results

A.V. Arockiam and Etc. Vs. Arul Mary Alias Latchumi Devi and anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Family

Acts : Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 3, 3(1), 3(3), 3(4), 8, 10, 18, 23, 27 and 34; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 15 and 24

Reported in : AIR2002Mad435; (2002)2MLJ506

to pronounce a decree' for dissolution of marriage.3. Apart from the preamble, the sections relevant in the Indian Divorce Act, 1869 (now the Divorce Act) are Sections 3(1), 3(3), 3(4), 4. 6, 8, 10, 11, 16, 18, 20, 22, … clearly that it possesses jurisdiction to pronounce a decree' for dissolution of marriage.3. Apart from the preamble, the sections relevant in the Indian Divorce Act, 1869 (now the Divorce Act) are Sections 3(1), 3(3), 3(4), 4. 6, … particular significance.18. Not only Section 18. but also Sections 23, 27 and 34 say that 'any spouse may present the application for judicial separation, protection

Robert Sebastian Vs. Linet Suba Also Known as Linet Suba Robert and an ...

Court : Kerala

Subject : Family

Acts : Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 17, 34 and 55

Reported in : AIR1992Ker412; II(1992)DMC345

below and the reference is disposed of accordingly. Family - divorce - Sections 17, 34 and 55 of Divorce Act, 1869 - reference made by District Court - marriage between petitioner and first respondent dissolved and adulterer second respondent … issue is not before this Court in a reference under Section 17 of the Act. 9. As per Section 34 of the Act, any husband may, either in a petition for dissolution of the marriage, or in a

Premchand Hira Vs. Bai Galal

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Reported in : AIR1927Bom594; (1927)29BOMLR1336

Section 10 of the Indian Divorce Act 1869. That is so for the section dealing with damages is Section 34 and not Section 10; and in the face of those clear provisions of Section 34 it is idle … to prove that one or both of the parties were Christians. Further, under Section 2 of the Indian Divorce Act 1869, it is essential to prove that the petitioner professed the Christian religion at the date of presenting the

Manekbai Nadirshaw Vachha Vs. Nadirshaw Jamshedji Vachha

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Reported in : (1936)38BOMLR836; 165Ind.Cas.977

the section corresponding to Section 34 of the Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act (viz., Section 37 of the Divorce Act, 1869). Lord Russell in dealing with orders for alimony after judicial separation pointed out that such orders differed from

NagIn Mansukhlal Dagli Vs. Haribhai Manibhai Patel

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CivilTenancy

Acts : Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882 - Sections 19, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45 and 46; Presidency Small Cause Courts (Maharashtra Amendment) Act, 1975; Bombay City Civil Court Act, 1948 - Sections 3; Bombay High Court Letters Patents Amendment Act, 1948; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 20, Rule 12; Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 28; Bombay Government Premises (Eviction) Act, 1955; Bombay Municipal Corporation Act; Bombay Housing Board Act, 1948; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 108; Special Marriage Act, 1954 - Sections 37; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 25; Indian Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 37; Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936 - Sections 40; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 34

Reported in : AIR1980Bom123

the Special Marriage Act, 1954; Section 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955; Section 37 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869; and Section 40 of the Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936. Words which describe a person's legal character … by Chap. VI of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. When declarations can be granted is provided for by Section 34 of that Act, which occurs in that Chapter. Under the said Section 34 'Any person entitled to any

Alfred Wilkinson Vs. Grace Emily Wilkinson

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Reported in : AIR1923Bom321; (1923)25BOMLR945

the basis that the parties were domiciled in England. The learned Judge said:The jurisdiction depends on the Indian Divorce Act, 1869, and so long as that Act is in force, this Court cannot decline jurisdiction. Moreover the Courts in … Norman Macleod, Kt., C.J.1. This is a reference under Section 17 of the Indian Divorce Act IV of 1869 to the High Court of Bombay for the confirmation

Kuppu Damayanthi Vs. C. Rama Rao

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Family

Acts : Special Marriage Act, 1954 - Sections 24 and 34 (1); Special Marriage Act, 1872 - Sections 2 and 17; Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 10

Reported in : AIR1969AP62

of Special Marriage Act, 1954, Sections 2 and 17 of Special Marriage Act, 1872 and Section 10 of Divorce Act, 1869 - appeal against decree declaring marriage of parties to proceeding null and void - petition for nullity filed … considered the question whether there has not been any unnecessary or improper delay in instituting the proceeding' Under Section 34(1)(e) of the Special Marriage Act. 1954. it is only where the Court is satisfied that there has been

Akshat Commercial Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Kalpana Chakraborty and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : BankingLimitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 2, 2(1), 4 to 29 and 31 - Schedule - Articles 118 to 137; ;Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Articles 97 and 182; ;Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI), 2002 - Sections 13(1), 13(4), 13(5), 17, 17(1), 17(4), 17(5), 17(6), 17(7), 24, 34, 35, 36 and 37; ;Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 - Section 24; ;Companies Act, 1956; ;Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956; ;Securities and Exchange Board of India Act 1992; ;Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Section 25; ;Indian Easements Act, 1882 - Section 2; ;West Bengal Land Reforms (Amendent) Act, 1972 - Sections 6, 7, 8 and 9; ;Arbitration Act, 1940 - Section 20 and 20(2); ;Indian Divorce Act, 1869; ;Uttar Pradesh Ag

a suit and the parties are described as plaintiff and defendant respectively. Similarly, matrimonial suits under the Indian Divorce Act, 1869 are originated by filing a petition (Vide Chapter XXXVA of the Original Side Rules of this Court). A … are in lieu of a civil suit which remedy is ordinarily available but for the bar created under Section 34 of the Act.16. After the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Mardia Chemicals Ltd. (supra),

Beatrice Alice De Ste Croix Vs. Philip De Ste Croix

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Family

Reported in : 41Ind.Cas.447

which renders proof of conjugal cohabitation or the restitution of conjugal rights necessary. Section 14 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869, provides that no adultery shall be deemed to have been condoned within the meaning of the Act unless … Butler v. Butler (1890) 15 P. D. 66 : 59 L. J. P. 25 : 62 L. T. 344 : 38 W. R. 390. the object of the special provision with regard to collusion is to compel

Ms Jorden Diengdeh Vs. S.S. Chopra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Family

Acts : Special Marriage Act, 1954 - Sections 23 to 28; Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936 - Sections 31 to 34; Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act, 1939 - Sections 2; Indian Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 18, 19, 10 and 22; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 125; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 10, 13(1A) and 13B

Reported in : AIR1985SC935; 1985(1)SCALE952; (1985)3SCC62; [1985]Supp1SCR704; 1986(1)LC247(SC)

of marriage or judicial separation was filed in 1980 under Sections 18, 19 and 20 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869. The prayer for declaration no nullity of marriage was rejected by a learned single judge of the High … 1975. The present petition for declaration of nullity of marriage or judicial separation was filed in 1980 under Sections 18, 19 and 20 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869. The prayer for declaration no nullity of marriage … that the defendant has ceased to be a Parsi.'(Provise has been omitted)Section 34 provides for judicial separation on any of the grounds on which divorce