Advanced Search Results

Mrs. Hazel Arnone Vs. George Thomas Robert Arnone and anr.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Family

Acts : Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 7, 17A, 47 and 51

Reported in : AIR1966Ker34

wife of the first respondent She seeks a dissolution of her marriage under Section 10 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869. 2. Under Section 10 a wife can present a petition praying that her marriage should be dissolved on … public policy will not he enforced.'And the learned author cites Rowley v. Rowley, (1866) 3 Sw & Tr 338 as an instance where the House of Lords recognised a compromise; Stanes v. Stancs, (1877) 8 P. D.

Samraj Nadar Vs. Abraham Nadachi

Court : Chennai

Subject : FamilyCriminal

Acts : Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 22, 32 and 33; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 497; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 9

Reported in : AIR1970Mad434

Judge, Kanyakumari dismissing his petition O. P. No. 41 of 1964 filed under Section 32 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869, for restitution of conjugal rights. The appellant and the respondent Abraham Nadachi were married according to the Christian … appellant is entitled, as a matter of right, to restitution of conjugal rights. The argument is that under Section 33 of the Indian Divorce Act nothing shall be pleaded in answer to a petition for restitution of conjugal

Edward Caston Vs. L.H. Caston and W.T. Cogdell

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Family

Reported in : (1900)ILR22All270

Arthur Strachey, C.J.1. This is a, reference to the Court under Section 9 of the Indian Divorce Act (IV of 1869), by the District Judge of Agra, of a question arising in a suit for dissolution … would not have been numbered as a clause. When the Sections of the Code to which he refers--Sections 33, 35, 48, 57 and 123--are looked at, I think it clearly appears that they establish no such proposition.

Blanche Somerset Taylor Vs. Charles George Bleach

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Reported in : AIR1915Bom50; (1915)17BOMLR56

of 29 & 30 Vic. c. 32 (1866) which have been combined into Section 37 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869. The Judge Ordinary Sir C. Cresswell ordered the absolute payment of a gross sum in the case of … reported cases covering a period from 1870 to 1902 (viz. Morris v. Morris (1861) L.J.31 P. & M. 33, Stanley v. Stanley [1898] P. 227, Kirk v. Kirk [1902] P. 145) the Divorce Court in England has

Miss Blanche Somerset Taylor Vs. Charles George Bleach

Court : Mumbai

Subject : FamilyCivil

Reported in : (1915)ILR39Bom182

of 29 & 30 Vict. c. 32 (1866) which have been combined into Section 37 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869. The Judge Ordinary Sir C. Cresswell ordered the absolute payment of a gross sum in the case of … reported cases covering a period from 1870 to 1902 viz., Morris v. Morris (1861) 31 L.J.P. & M. 33. Stanley v. Stanley [1898] P. 82, Kirk v. Kirk [1902] P. 145 the Divorce Court in England has

Jane Antony and ors. Vs. V.M. Siyath and ors.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 8, 33, 36 and 37 to 40; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 166; Indian Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 19, 21 and 57; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 12 and 16; Domestic Violence Act, 2005; Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 - Sections 2(1) and 6; Property Law (Amendment) Act, 1971; Status of Children Act, 1969 - Sections 3; Matrimonial Causes Act; Family Law Reform Act, 1969; Family Law Reform (Amendment) Act, 1987; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 125 and 125(1); Hindu Law; Muslim Law; Constitution of India - Article 32; Central Civil Service (Conduct) Rules; Bihar Government Servants' Conduct Rules, 1976

Reported in : 2009ACJ2272

the Indian Succession Act. Even though counsel for the appellants relied on Sections 57 and 21 of Indian Divorce Act, 1869 and contended that only legitimate children are entitled to succeed to the estate except in the specific case … Act, 1925, which is the law of succession applicable to the appellants. Counsel for the appellants relied on Section 33(a) of the Indian Succession Act and contended that appellant No. 1 being the widow of the deceased is

Alfred Wilkinson Vs. Grace Emily Wilkinson

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Reported in : AIR1923Bom321; (1923)25BOMLR945

the basis that the parties were domiciled in England. The learned Judge said:The jurisdiction depends on the Indian Divorce Act, 1869, and so long as that Act is in force, this Court cannot decline jurisdiction. Moreover the Courts in … Norman Macleod, Kt., C.J.1. This is a reference under Section 17 of the Indian Divorce Act IV of 1869 to the High Court of Bombay for the confirmation … were to be curtailed in matters matrimonial. On the contrary in para 33 the Secretary of State wrote:Her Majesty's Government are desirous of placing the

Ramish Francis Toppo Vs. Violet Francis Toppo

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Family

Acts : Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 3(9), 10, 11, 14, 17, 22, 45, 47 and 51; ;Constitution of India - Article 141; ;Evidence Act - Section 3

Reported in : AIR1989Cal128,(1989)1CALLT87(HC),1988(2)CHN241,93CWN165,1(1989)DMC322

dissolution of marriage passed by the learned District Judge in the Divorce Suit under Section 10 of the Divorce Act, 1869, which has come up before us for confirmation under Section 17 of the Act. I am, however, of … of additional procedural burden and have thus been denied procedural due process or procedural reasonableness. Then again, while Section 33 of the Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act makes the joinder of adulterer compulsory, whosoever may be the petitioner,

Manekbai Nadirshaw Vachha Vs. Nadirshaw Jamshedji Vachha

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Reported in : (1936)38BOMLR836; 165Ind.Cas.977

the section corresponding to Section 34 of the Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act (viz., Section 37 of the Divorce Act, 1869). Lord Russell in dealing with orders for alimony after judicial separation pointed out that such orders differed from … the original order. The only sections in the Act dealing with alimony are Sections 33, 34 and 35. Section 33 deals with alimony pendente lite and we are not concerned with that. But it may be noted that

B. Iswarayya Vs. Swarnam Iswarayya

Court : Privy Council

Subject : Land Acquisition

Russell of Killowen: The principal question which is raised for decision by this appeal is whether, under the Divorce Act (No. 4 of 1869), the Court, having once made an order granting permanent alimony to a wife who … did in purported exercise of the powers conferred by O. 41, R. 33, Civil P. C. The decree is dated 15th February 1929, and it … the true construction and effect of the Act, of which the relevant provisions may conveniently be set out. Section 7 enacts ; " Subject to, the provisions contained in this Act, the High Courts and District Courts