Advanced Search Results

Nina Dalal Vs. Merwanji Pheeozshaw Dalal

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Reported in : (1930)32BOMLR1046

petition, as I have already said, is one for the restitution of conjugal rights. That is based on Section 32 of the Indian Divorce Act of 1869 which runs :--When either the husband or the wife has, without … Christians but only one, and that, consequently, the jurisdiction given or continued to this Court by the Indian Divorce Act 1869, as subsequently amended, does not apply.2. As regards the facts, it is sufficient to say that the lady

Samraj Nadar Vs. Abraham Nadachi

Court : Chennai

Subject : FamilyCriminal

Acts : Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 22, 32 and 33; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 497; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 9

Reported in : AIR1970Mad434

Judge, Kanyakumari dismissing his petition O. P. No. 41 of 1964 filed under Section 32 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869, for restitution of conjugal rights. The appellant and the respondent Abraham Nadachi were married according to the Christian

Mr 'X' Vs. Hospital 'Z'

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Consumer

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 21; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 26, 269 and 270; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 13(1); Dissolution of Muslim Marriage Act, 1939 - Sections 2; Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936 - Sections 32; Indian Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 10; Indian Medical Council (Amendment) Act, 1964; Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 - Sections 20A; Special Marriage Act 1954 - Sections 27

Reported in : AIR1999SC495; JT1998(7)SC626; 1998(6)SCALE230; 1999(1)LC232(SC); (1998) 8 SCC 296

is that the defendant has, since the marriage, infected the plaintiff with venereal disease. 34. Under the Indian Divorce Act, 1869, the grounds for dissolution of a marriage have been set out in Section 10 which provides that a … 33. Under the Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936, one of the grounds for divorce set out in Section 32 is that the defendant has, since the marriage, infected the plaintiff with venereal disease. 34. Under the Indian

Peter Philip Saldanha Vs. Anne Grace Saldanha

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Reported in : (1930)32BOMLR17

jurisdiction in this suit to pass a decree for restitution of conjugal rights. Section 32 of the Indian Divorce Act of 1869 requires an application for restitution of conjugal rights to be made by petition, and except upon

Peter Philip Saldanha and ors. Vs. Anne Grace Saldanha

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : 124Ind.Cas.776

jurisdiction in this suit to pass a decree for restitution of conjugal rights. Section 32 of the Indian Divorce Act of ,1869 requires an application for restitution of conjugal rights to be made by petition, and except upon

Sujatha Christiana Vs. C. Thomas

Court : Chennai

Subject : Family

Acts : Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 32, 41 and 42

Reported in : AIR2002Mad6

parties are directed to bear their respective costs. Family - cohabitation - Sections 32, 41 and 42 of Divorce Act, 1869 - husband's petition for restitution of conjugal rights - letters sent between spouses prove that husband unwilling for … to prove her case that she has not withdrawn from the society of her husband without reasonable cause. Section 32 of the Indian Divorce Act states that the Court on being satisfied of the truth of the statement

Fazal Masih Vs. Smt. Patience

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Family

Acts : Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 10, 12 to 14, 32 and 47

Reported in : 1974(7)WLN74

proved and there is no impediment to its grant. Divorce by consent is not obtainable under the Indian Divorce Act, 1869. Much less a petition for restitution of conjugal rights under Section 32 of the Act filed by the

Giddi Gowthami @ Jyoti Vs. Giddi Samuel

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 18, 19, 20, 32 and 36

Reported in : 2005(3)ALT102; II(2005)DMC605

respondent herein filed O.P.No. 790 of 2003 for restitution of conjugal rights under Section 32 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869 (for short 'the Act'). The petitioner/wife filed I.A.No. 162 of 2001 under Section 36 of the Act for

Mrs. Hazel Arnone Vs. George Thomas Robert Arnone and anr.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Family

Acts : Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 7, 17A, 47 and 51

Reported in : AIR1966Ker34

wife of the first respondent She seeks a dissolution of her marriage under Section 10 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869. 2. Under Section 10 a wife can present a petition praying that her marriage should be dissolved on … evidence, should invariably be followed in every case unless there are some very good reasons io the contrary. 32. The same apprehension holds good when I read the observation of Costello, J. To follow their example in

Mabel Treeza Pinto Vs. Francis Pinto

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Family

parties. Resultantly, both appeals fail and accordingly stand dismissed. No costs. Indian Divorce Act, 1869 - section 55, section 32 €“ ground of illicit relation - decree of divorce - restitution of conjugal right- Appellant and respondent were … of filing the petition? Re-point No.(i): Both appellant and respondent belong to Christian Community and governed by the Divorce Act, 1869. A combined reading of the pleadings, depositions and material papers contained in voluminous records reveal following incontrovertible facts.