Advanced Search Results
Monika Sanctis Vs. Henry Joseph and anr.
Karnataka
Dec-17-2002
Family
Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 10, 14, 16 and 17; Family Courts Act, 1984 - Sections 19
ILR2004KAR2081; 2003(2)KarLJ588
between the parties had been dissolved. However, we had referred to the provisions of Section 16 of the Divorce Act, 1869 in the last para of the judgment and had indicated that the decree of nisi for divorce can … clause seeks to amend Section 16 of the Act. The amendment is consequential to the amendments made in Section 17 of the Act to do away with the requirement of confirmation of decree of District Court by the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Deepika Alizabeth Couto Vs. Gabriel Anthony Couto
Allahabad
Oct-03-1977
FamilyCivil
Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 10 and 17; Uttar Pradesh Divorce Act, 1957; Constitution of India - Article 227; Constitution of India (42nd Amendment) Act, 1976
AIR1978All27
M.N. Shukla, J.1. This reference purporting to be one under Section 17 of the Indian Divorce Act. 1869 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) reveals a curious state of affairs. A petition was made under Section
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskP.V. Josheph Christian Vs. Deenamma Josheph Christian
Gujarat
Oct-30-2002
FamilyCivil
Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 10 and 17; Divorce (Amendment) Act, 2001; Gujarat High Court Rules, 1993 - Rule 197
II(2004)DMC592; (2003)1GLR196
has been put in focus, for our consideration and adjudication in this reference, under Section 17 of the Divorce Act, 1869 (the Act) by the District Court, Ahmedabad Rural at Mirzapur Court, arising out of Civil Suit No. 3
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Deepa Raj Kumar Singh Vs. Deepak Kumar
Patna
Jan-12-2005
Family
Indian Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 17; Indian Divorce (Amendment) Act, 2001
Accordingly, the judgment and decree passed by the Court below is confirmed and the reference is disposed of. Divorce Act, 1869, Section 17 - Confirmation of judgment and decree passed by the High Court--Passed by the Court below--Deletion of said provision
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMaria Sera Pinto Vs. Milton Dias
Mumbai
Aug-25-2000
Family
Indian Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 10, 16, 17 and 20 - Rules 818, 819 and 820; Family Courts Act, 1984 - Sections 7, 8, 19 and 20; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15 and 21
2001(1)BomCR585; (2001)1BOMLR56; I(2002)DMC554; 2000(4)MhLj633
Hon'ble Chief Justice for a decision as to whether the procedure contemplated under Section 16 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869 of confirmation of a decree nisi made by the High Court on its original side is still required … a decree nisi in the first instance, which is required to be confirmed within the period prescribed under Section 17, if it is a decree nisi made by the District Judge, it is subject to confirmation by the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRosy Kurian Kannanaikal Vs. Joseph Verghese Cheeran
Karnataka
Apr-05-2002
FamilyCivil
Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 10, 10A, 14, 16, 17, 19 and 20; ;Family Courts Act, 1984 - Sections 19 and 19(1); Divorce (Amendment) Act, 2001- Sections 29 and 55
II(2002)DMC79; ILR2002KAR1831; 2004(3)KarLJ75
of a decree for dissolution of marriage or nullity of marriage, under Sections 17 and 20 of the Divorce Act, 1869, is necessary where such decree is granted by a Family Court, under the Family Courts Act, 1984?(ii) Whether … between the contesting parties under the provisions of the Divorce Act.4. The Family Court in purported compliance of Section 17 of the Divorce Act has submitted the impugned decree of dissolution of marriage to the High Court for
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJyotsna W/O Suresh Jagtap Vs. Suresh John Jagtap
Mumbai
Feb-02-2001
Family
Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 10 and 17; Family Courts Act, 1984 - Sections 7(1), 8, 19 and 20
2001(3)BomCR14; I(2001)DMC776
reference made to this Court by the Family Court at Nagpur, purportedly under section 17 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869, for confirmation of a decree for dissolution of marriage made by the Family Court.2. The facts giving rise
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMrs. Nisha Ribero Vs. Mr. George Mario Ribeiro
Delhi
Sep-26-2003
Family
Indian Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 10 and 17; Indian Divorce (Amendment) Act, 2001 - Sections 12; Indian Christian Marriage Act, 1872
2004IAD(Delhi)70; 108(2003)DLT48; II(2003)DMC807; 2003(71)DRJ763
ORDER1. This Reference has been made by the Additional District Judge under Section 17 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869 by his order dated 25.9.2001. By a judgment and order of the same date i.e., 25.9.2001, the learned
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRobert Sebastian Vs. Linet Suba Also Known as Linet Suba Robert and an ...
Kerala
Jul-02-1992
Family
Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 17, 34 and 55
AIR1992Ker412; II(1992)DMC345
below and the reference is disposed of accordingly. Family - divorce - Sections 17, 34 and 55 of Divorce Act, 1869 - reference made by District Court - marriage between petitioner and first respondent dissolved and adulterer second respondent … Sreedharan, J. 1. This is a reference made by the District Court, Kollam, under Section 17 of the Indian Divorce Act, hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'. Court below, by order dated 4-7-1991, dissolved
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMolly Joseph Alias Nish Vs. George Sebastian Alias Joy
Supreme Court of India
Sep-18-1996
Family
Indian Divorce Act, 1869 . - Section 18, 19(4), 20 rw 17,
AIR1997SC109a; (1997)1MLJ109a(SC); [1996]Supp6SCR497; 1996(2)LC729(SC)
and as there was no decree of any civil court in accordance with the provisions of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869 (hereinafter referred to as “the Divorce Act”) the former marriage continued in spite of annulment order passed by … declared a nullity because of Section 19(4) of the Divorce Act. As required by Section 20 read with Section 17 of the aforesaid Act the order of the District Judge was placed before a Bench of three Judges
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »