Advanced Search Results
R. Amirda Amalraj Vs. Thamima
Chennai
Aug-18-1994
Family
Indian Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 10 and 11
I(1995)DMC191
not prove adultery by itself.5. Moreover in the present case the requirements of Section 11 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') are not satisfied. Under Section 11 of the Act, upon any petition
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askidicula Jacob Vs. Mariyamma
Kerala
Aug-23-1974
Family
Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 11
AIR1976Ker89
terms. There will be no order as to costs. Family - divorce - Sections 10 and 11 of Divorce Act, 1869 - appeal against dismissal of petition seeking divorce on ground of adultery - appelant-husband claimed that respondent-wife leading … in the petition were denied by the respondent. No leave was sought for or granted as required by Section 11 of the Act The case went to trial and the appellant examined himself and 7 other witnesses and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThomas Vs. Lucy
Karnataka
Nov-24-1993
Family
Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 11; Family Courts Act, 1984 - Sections 16(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 19, Rule 1
II(1994)DMC49; ILR1994KAR1; 1994(2)KarLJ354
between the petitioner and the respondent in M.C.No. 638/1991, a petition filed under Section 10 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869. ('Act' for short).2. The petitioner is the husband and the respondent is the wife. They were married on … Court has allowed the petition by order dated 25.4.1992. We find that the order suffers from two infirmities.3. Section 11 of the Act requires that if the petition is filed by an husband, he shall make the alleged
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Parkash Ram Kumar Vs. Smt. Victoria
Delhi
Jul-11-2000
Family
Indian Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 10 and 11
II(2000)DMC372
ORDERArijit Pasayat, CJ.1. An application for divorce was filed under Section 10 of Indian Divorce Act 1869 (in short the 'Act') by the husband on the ground of adultery. Accepting the prayer a decree for … examined, we find no reason to take a view different from one taken by learned trial Judge. Additionally Section 11 which needs implication of adulterer to be co-respondent has been complied with and the alleged adulterer was in
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPremchand Hira Vs. Bai Galal
Mumbai
Jun-25-1927
Family
AIR1927Bom594; (1927)29BOMLR1336
to prove that one or both of the parties were Christians. Further, under Section 2 of the Indian Divorce Act 1869, it is essential to prove that the petitioner professed the Christian religion at the date of presenting the … v. Warren [1925] P. 107, to which my Lord ' the Chief Justice has referred, says at p. 112 :-'Her evidence (that is the wife's evidence) and proof of her conduct and statements are admissible unless and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAjitrai Shivprasad Mehta Vs. Bai Vasumati
Gujarat
Jun-20-1967
Family
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 5, 10, 10(1), 11, 12, 12(1), 13 and 13(1); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 45; Indian Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 19(3); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 84; Indian Contract Act - Sections 12; Lunacy Act, 1890 - Sections 90
AIR1969Guj48; (1969)GLR253
and legal definitions of insanity in the context of a similar legislation viz., Section 19(3) of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869, which provided for a decree of nullity of marriage on the ground of the other spouse being 'an … the condition in Section 5(ii) is not fulfilled the marriage is not a void marriage as provided in Section 11, but a voidable marriage, under Section 12, which can be annulled by a decree of nullity on the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSarah Abraham Vs. Pyli Abraham
Kerala
Mar-17-1958
Family
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 11; Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 7 and 10
AIR1959Ker352
of conjugal rights - Section 11 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and Sections 7 and 10 of Divorce Act, 1869 - appeal against decree of Lower Court for restitution of conjugal rights against wife - wife-appellant contended that
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskOm Prakash Gupta Vs. Puspa Kumari
Delhi
Oct-28-1969
Family
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 5
ILR1969Delhi953
made by sections 11 and 12 read with section 5 of the Act. Section 19 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869, however, already existed on the Indian statute book outside the Hindu Law. It was in pari materia to
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskWenmanard Marak Vs. Smt. Poiby Momin
Guwahati
Jan-27-1988
FamilyCivil
Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 11; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 58
matter of filing this petition for divorce. 6. We, however, find one procedural defect in this petition. Under Section 11 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869 where adultery is taken by the husband as a ground for dissolution … decree nisi passed by the Additional Deputy Commissioner, West Garo Hills, Tura under Section 10 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869 has come up for confirmation under Section 17 of that Act in this reference. 2. The petitioner sued
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr. Dwaraka Bai Vs. Professor Nainan Mathews
Chennai
Jan-28-1953
Family
Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 10; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 11; Constitution of India - Articles 13, 14 and 15
AIR1953Mad792
entitle him to compensatory costs, but only to ordinary taxed costs. Family - divorce - Section 10 of Divorce Act, 1869, Section 11 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and Articles 13, 14 and 15 of Constitution of India - petition
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »