Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: divorce act 1869 section 1 · Page 1 of about 719 results (0.029 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 29 1984

Jordan Diengdoh Vs. Swaranjeet Singh Chopra

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-29-1984

Subject : Family

Acts : Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 19(1); Christian Marriage Act, 1872 - Sections 4

Reported in : ILR1984Delhi14; 1984RLR595

husband and wife.(3) The prevent petition has been filed under Ss. 18, 19 and 22 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869. Under S. 18, any husband or wife may present a petition praying that his or her marriage may … the intended marriage postulated by S. 38 of the Act did not comply with the requirements of that section, and further that the provisions of Ss. 41, 42 and 51 of the Act had been violated which … of cruelty.(2) The marriage between the parties was solemnized 'at Delhi on 14th October 1975 under the Indian Christian Marriage Act, 1872 (tor short hereinafter

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 13 1993

Vincent Joseph Konath and Etc. Vs. Jacintha Angela Vincent Konath and ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-13-1993

Subject : Family

Acts : Foreign Marriage Act, 1969 - Sections 18(1) and (4); Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 2; Family Courts Act, 1984 - Sections 7 and 8; Bombay High Court Rules - Rule 131; Special Marriage Act, 1954

Reported in : AIR1994Bom120; 1994(1)MhLj477

to interpret Ss. 18(1) and 18(4) of the Foreign Marriage Act 1969 and S. 2 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869 and consider as to whether this Honourable Court has jurisdiction to entertain this suit. The Prothonotary and Senior … said averments are presumed to be correct for the time being and for the purpose of this reference.6. Section 18(1) of the Foreign Marriage Act 1969 provides that the provisions of Chapter IV, V, VI and VII

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 05 2002

A.V. Arockiam and Etc. Vs. Arul Mary Alias Latchumi Devi and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-05-2002

Subject : Family

Acts : Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 3, 3(1), 3(3), 3(4), 8, 10, 18, 23, 27 and 34; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 15 and 24

Reported in : AIR2002Mad435; (2002)2MLJ506

to pronounce a decree' for dissolution of marriage.3. Apart from the preamble, the sections relevant in the Indian Divorce Act, 1869 (now the Divorce Act) are Sections 3(1), 3(3), 3(4), 4. 6, 8, 10, 11, 16, 18, 20, 22, … clearly that it possesses jurisdiction to pronounce a decree' for dissolution of marriage.3. Apart from the preamble, the sections relevant in the Indian Divorce Act, 1869 (now the Divorce Act) are Sections 3(1), 3(3), 3(4), 4. 6,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 06 1997

Mrs. Pragati Varghese and Etc. Vs. Cyril George Varghese and Etc.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : May-06-1997

Subject : Civil

Acts : Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 10, 16, 17 and 20; Constitution of India - Articles 2, 13, 14, 15, 21, 38(2) and 44; High Court Original Side Rules, 1980 - Rule 28; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 7 and 13(1A); Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act, 1939; The Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936; The Special Marriage Act, 1954; The Foreign Marriage Act, 1959 - Sections 22; Matrimonial Causes Act, 1857; Matrimonial Causes Act, 1923; Matrimonial Causes Act, 1937; Divorce Reforms Act, 1969; Matrimonial Causes Act, 1973 - Sections 1 and 3; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 125 and 488; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 377 and 498-A; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 112

Reported in : AIR1997Bom349; 1997(3)ALLMR504; 1997(4)BomCR551; 1997BomCR(Cri)918; (1997)3BOMLR333; II(1997)DMC407; 1997(3)MhLj602

trial to the learned single Judge. Prayer, in this behalf, is accordingly rejected.59. Order accordingly. [A] The Indian Divorce Act, 1869 - Section 10 and Constitution of India, 1950: Article 19, 16,21 - Seeking a divorce on the ground of adultry … of marriage to be sole ground of divorce. The aforesaid Act is replaced by Matrimonial Causes Act, 1973. Section 1 of the Act has reiterated the ground of marriage having broken down irretrievably as a ground for divorce.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 05 1990

Amarthala Hemalatha Vs. Dasari Balu Rajendra Varaprasad

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-05-1990

Subject : Family

Acts : Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 7, 10, 14, 17, 22, 24, 25 and 26; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 13(1) and 13(1)(A); Special Marriage Act, 1954 - Sections 27(1) and 28; Matrimonial Causes Act, 1857; Supreme Court of Judicature (Consolidation) Act, 1925; Matrimonial Causes (Amendment) Act, 1937; Divorce Reform Act, 1969; Nullity of Marriage Act, 1971; Matrimonial Causes (Amendment) Act, 1973 - Sections 1(2); Matrimonial Causes (Amendment) Act, 1950;

Reported in : AIR1990AP220; II(1991)DMC194

The reference is disposed of accordingly. Family - dissolution of marriage - Sections 7, 10 and 22 of Divorce Act, 1869, Section 13 (1) (a) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and Section 27 (1) (a) of Special Marriage Act, 1954

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 05 2002

Rosy Kurian Kannanaikal Vs. Joseph Verghese Cheeran

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-05-2002

Subject : FamilyCivil

Acts : Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 10, 10A, 14, 16, 17, 19 and 20; ;Family Courts Act, 1984 - Sections 19 and 19(1); Divorce (Amendment) Act, 2001- Sections 29 and 55

Reported in : II(2002)DMC79; ILR2002KAR1831; 2004(3)KarLJ75

of a decree for dissolution of marriage or nullity of marriage, under Sections 17 and 20 of the Divorce Act, 1869, is necessary where such decree is granted by a Family Court, under the Family Courts Act, 1984?(ii) Whether … reference to High Court for confirmation of a decree for dissolution of marriage or nullity of marriage, under Sections 17 and 20 of the Divorce Act, 1869, is necessary where such decree is granted by a Family … Hon'ble Chief Justice to constitute a larger Bench vide its order dated 15-12-2000.2. As per the direction of the Chief Justice vide order dated 8-3-2002,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 18 2002

Asha Gomes Vs. Arthur Gomes

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-18-2002

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 10

Reported in : 2002(2)ALLMR687; 2002(3)BomCR485; I(2002)DMC794

had filed the above referred matrimonial petition, seeking divorce under the provisions of Section 10 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869 on the ground of cruelty, as interpreted by the Full Bench of this Court in Pragati Varghese v. … also. The appellant herein had filed the above referred matrimonial petition, seeking divorce under the provisions of Section 10 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869 on the ground of cruelty, as interpreted by the Full Bench of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 06 2005

Choppala Lalitha Kumari Vs. Gogulamudi Bhaskara Rao

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-06-2005

Subject : FamilyCivil

Acts : Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 3, 3(1), 3(3), 4, 8, 10, 10A, 10A(1), 16, 17 and 19; Divorce Rules; Indian Divorce (Amendment) Act, 2001 - Sections 10A; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 15; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : 2005(6)ALT628; I(2006)DMC607

office while numbering the O.P. filed by the petitioner under Section 10-A(1) read with Section 8 of the Divorce Act, 1869 (hereinafter in short referred to as 'Act' for the purpose of convenience).2. This O.P is presented before this

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 14 1985

Kunnarath Yesoda Vs. Manathanath Narayanan

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jun-14-1985

Subject : Family

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) ; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 15, 23 and 28(4); Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 12, 12(2), 24(4), 29, 29(2) and 29(3); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 10

Reported in : AIR1985Ker220

relevant portion of the reference order is extracted below : --The reason for excluding suits under the Indian Divorce Act, 1869 from the operation of the Limitation Act, is obvious and that is, the policy of law is such … taken to obtain a certified copy of the decree of the lower court, for filing the appeal? Can Section 12(2) of the Limitation Act be invoked by the appellant?2. The appellant is the wife who married the … the decree of the lower court, for filing the appeal? Can Section 12(2) of the Limitation Act be invoked by the appellant?2. The appellant is

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 04 1923

Alfred Wilkinson Vs. Grace Emily Wilkinson

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-04-1923

Subject : Family

Reported in : AIR1923Bom321; (1923)25BOMLR945

the basis that the parties were domiciled in England. The learned Judge said:The jurisdiction depends on the Indian Divorce Act, 1869, and so long as that Act is in force, this Court cannot decline jurisdiction. Moreover the Courts in … 1858, which was the earliest date for the Act to come into operation. (See Matrimonial Causes Act, 1857, Section 1). Consequently it cannot be said that by 1861 sufficient time had elapsed to see on what principles this

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial