Advanced Search Results

P.V. Josheph Christian Vs. Deenamma Josheph Christian

Court : Gujarat

Subject : FamilyCivil

Acts : Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 10 and 17; Divorce (Amendment) Act, 2001; Gujarat High Court Rules, 1993 - Rule 197

Reported in : II(2004)DMC592; (2003)1GLR196

has been put in focus, for our consideration and adjudication in this reference, under Section 17 of the Divorce Act, 1869 (the Act) by the District Court, Ahmedabad Rural at Mirzapur Court, arising out of Civil Suit No. 3 … Rules Nos. 13 and 16 of the Divorce (District Court) Rules, 1929 and also Rule 197 incorporated in Chapter 18 of the Gujarat High Court Rules, 1993 relating to the procedure for confirmation of a decree under … the husband. The learned trial Court Judge raised the issues, at Exh. 8, and recorded the evidence, which is consisted of the evidence of original

Devi Saran Mishra Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

35A of Central Excises and Salt Act 1944. The High Courts have also enjoyed jurisdiction under the Indian Divorce Act, 1869, and the Parsi marriage and Divorce Act, 1936. Different types of litigation coming before the High Court in … Tribunals over a period of three years or so after their institution, will be useful for our purpose. Chapter VIII of the second volume of the Report, 'Alternative Modes and Forums for Dispute Resolution,' deals with the … up and considered, and they have been answered in paragraphs 77, 79, 80,81, 82, 92, 93, 94, 97, 98, 100 and 101, which are being

Mathew Varghese Vs. Rosamma Varghese

Court : Kerala

Subject : Family

Acts : Christian Law

Reported in : AIR2003Ker312; 2003(4)CTC193; (2004)186CTR(Ker)172; I(2004)DMC148; 2003(3)KLT6

under Section 9 and Order 32-A of theCode of Civil Procedure. Sections 41 to 44 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869 recognize andregulate the right to maintenance. He further submitted that Section 23(2) of the HinduAdoptions and Maintenance Act, … his children, so the God pities those who fear him'. Epistle of St. Paul to Thimothios (First Timothy. Chapter 5. Verse 8V'If anyone does not take care of his relatives especially the members of his own family, … son. Thus, she made a claim for a total sum of Rs. 86,639.00. This included a sum of Rs: 14,400/- on account of maintenance of

Ammini E.J. and Etc. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Family

Acts : Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 10 and 22; Constitution of India - Articles 13, 14, 15 and 21; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 488; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 112 and 115; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955; Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936; Muslim Marriage Act, 1939; Special Marriage Act, 1934; Foreign Marriage Act, 1969

Reported in : AIR1995Ker252

Ramakrishnan, J. 1. The constitutional validity of Section 10 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869 (for short 'the Act') which regulated divorce among Christians in India for a century and a quarter is … based on the biblical principle that 'What God, then has joined, let not man put as under (Mathew, Chapter XIX, Verse 6) and how a Christian priest and a Christian institute for the study of Religion and … association of persons, cultural and social institutions such asSuhruth, Reg. No. 404/ 88, Kottayam, Kerala Manila Samajam, Vazhuthacaud, Trivandrum, Jonakiya Vimochana Viswas Prasthanam belonging to

Mary Sonia Zachariah Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 10 and 22; Constitution of India - Articles 13, 14, 15, 19 and 21; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955; The Dissolution of Muslim Marriage Act, 1939; The Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936; The Special Marriage Act, 1954; The Foreign Marriage Act, 1969

Reported in : II(1995)DMC27

T.V. Ramakrishnan, J.1. The constitutional validity of Section 10 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869 (for short 'the Act') which regulated divorce among Christians in India for a century and a quarter is … Pleader based on the biblical principle that 'What God, then has joined, let not man put asunder (Mathew, Chapter XIX, Verse 6) and how a Christian Priest and a Christian Institute for the Study of Religion and … in The State of Bombay v. Narasu Appa Mali (AIR 1952 Bombay 84) where it has been held that personal laws are not covered by

Supriyo @ Supriya Chakraborty Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the exercise of constitutional rights before they exercise them. VI. Divorce 120. Section 10 of the Indian Divorce Act 1869, which is applicable to Christians, previously permitted the husband to file a petition for divorce on the ground … similar family environment and naturally seeks out a family environment which is comparable to their birth family; b. Chapter II of the JJ Act which lays down the General Principles of Care and Protection of Children stresses … JUDGMENT Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, CJI Table of Contents A. Background ................................................................................................... 8 i. The decision of this Court in Navtej Singh Johar .................................. 8

Mozelle RobIn Solomon Vs. Lt. Col. R.J. Solomon

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Reported in : (1979)81BOMLR578

statute and is available only if a statute applicable to the parties so provides, for example, the Indian Divorce Act, 1869 the Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936; the Special Marriage Act, 1954 or the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. … teacher to pupil and from generation to generation. This traditional view takes the twelfth verse of the twenty-fourth chapter of the Book of Exodus for its Scriptural basis : -And the Lord said unto Moses, Come up … and the relevant portion of the judgment is as follows (at pp. 881, 882):We might also consider another point which was debated at the Bar

Rosy Kurian Kannanaikal Vs. Joseph Verghese Cheeran

Court : Karnataka

Subject : FamilyCivil

Acts : Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 10, 10A, 14, 16, 17, 19 and 20; ;Family Courts Act, 1984 - Sections 19 and 19(1); Divorce (Amendment) Act, 2001- Sections 29 and 55

Reported in : II(2002)DMC79; ILR2002KAR1831; 2004(3)KarLJ75

of a decree for dissolution of marriage or nullity of marriage, under Sections 17 and 20 of the Divorce Act, 1869, is necessary where such decree is granted by a Family Court, under the Family Courts Act, 1984?(ii) Whether … order passed by the Family Court with the consent of the parties or from an order passed under Chapter IX of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ( 2 of 1974): Provided that nothing in this sub-section … 15-12-2000.2. As per the direction of the Chief Justice vide order dated 8-3-2002, the matter has been placed before this larger Bench of five Judges

Kamal V.M. AllaudIn and Etc. Etc. Vs. Raja Shaikh and Etc. Etc.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Acts : Family Court's Act, 1984 - Sections 2, 3, 7, 8, 9, 10, 19, 20 and 28; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 2(4) and 9; Maharashtra Family Rules, 1987 - Rule 35; Family Courts (Court) Rules, 1988 - Rule 50; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973; Civil Court Act; Hindu Bigamous Marriages Act, 1946; Bombay Matrimonial (Transfer of Cases), Act, 1950 - Sections 4A, 19 and 35; Indian Divorce Act, 1945; Bombay City Civil Court Act, 1869 - Sections 3, 4, 5 and 12; Special Marriage Act, 1954; Foreign Marriage Act, 1969 - Sections 18(2); Hindu Marriage Act, 1956; Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 29(2); Indian Divorce Act, 1869; Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936 - Sections 18; Muslim Marriage Act, 1939 - Sections 15; General Clauses Act, 1897;

Reported in : AIR1990Bom299

intact.19. There are two other principal statutes of which note is required to be taken. Under the Indian Divorce Act, 1869, the term 'High Court' has been explained in the Interpretation Clause. Under Section 3(1) 'High Court' means,--'With reference … in the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, shall have the meanings respectively assigned to them in the Code.'6. Chapter III of the Act deals with jurisdiction.7. It is necessary to set out Ss. 7 and 8 of

Rachel BenjamIn Vs. BenjamIn Solomon Benjamin

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Family

Reported in : (1926)28BOMLR328; 94Ind.Cas.59

Court an issue was raised and the argument turned on the interpretation of Section 2 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869, viz., whether the 'residence' of the petitioner justified the requirements of that section. The Court held upon that … is undoubtedly obscure and opposed to the more enlightened practice of modern Judaism. The matter is discusssed in Chapter IV of Mielziner's work. Upon that statement of the law it would be difficult to hold that the … 104. The Supreme Court and the Sadar Diwani Adalat were abolished (s. 8). The jurisdiction of the High Court which took their place is defined