Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: disaster management act 2005 section 68 · Page 1 of about 92 results (0.058 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 28 2020

Praneeth K Vs. University Grants Commission (Ugc)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-28-2020

Subject : Education

gravely from pandemic of COVID­19 and 15 respective State Governments have imposed/implemented various levels of lockdown under the Disaster Management Act, 2005. Petitioner pleads that as a result of the lockdown, Universities, schools, educational institutions were forced to shut down … that provisions of Disaster Management Act will have overriding effect. He placed reliance on Section 72 of the Act, 2005. Section 72 shall override not only the provisions of Maharashtra University Act but also University Grants Commission Act, 1956 … able to legislate in this field, except as provided in Article 254.” 68 51. Constitution Bench had also occasion to elaborate on different aspects of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 05 2016

State of Kerala Represented by its Chief Secretary to Government and O ...

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Apr-05-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

Section 33 of the Act further throw sufficient light on the powers given to the authority under the Disaster Management Act, 2005. Section 33 of the Act empowers the District Authority to issue any direction to any Department of the District … being in force or in any instrument having effect by virtue of any law other than this Act. 68. While considering the nature and effect of non obstante clause, the Apex Court in Union of India and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 16 2020

Smt. Sunanda And Ors Vs. The State Of Karnataka And Ors

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

Decided on : Oct-16-2020

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the member of the board, due to any situation contemplated in any other Act which includes the Disaster Management Act, 2005 and thus the term of the members of the Board of management does not expire. It is precisely … of the Act and Rule 13-D of the Rules of 1960 and 68 therefore, the petitioners were not responsible for the delay in the conduct … THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO (A) STRIKE DOWN PROVISIONS OF SECTION28A(5), 28-B(2) OF THE ACT AS BEING UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND UNWORKABLE AND ETC. IN W.P. NO.226141/2020 BETWEEN:1. VEERAREDDY S/O SIDRAM

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 16 2020

Gurunath Reddy And Ors Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

Decided on : Oct-16-2020

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the member of the board, due to any situation contemplated in any other Act which includes the Disaster Management Act, 2005 and thus the term of the members of the Board of management does not expire. It is precisely … of the Act and Rule 13-D of the Rules of 1960 and 68 therefore, the petitioners were not responsible for the delay in the conduct … THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO (A) STRIKE DOWN PROVISIONS OF SECTION28A(5), 28-B(2) OF THE ACT AS BEING UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND UNWORKABLE AND ETC. IN W.P. NO.226141/2020 BETWEEN:1. VEERAREDDY S/O SIDRAM

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 16 2020

Gundappa And Ors Vs. The State Of Karnataka And Ors

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

Decided on : Oct-16-2020

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the member of the board, due to any situation contemplated in any other Act which includes the Disaster Management Act, 2005 and thus the term of the members of the Board of management does not expire. It is precisely … of the Act and Rule 13-D of the Rules of 1960 and 68 therefore, the petitioners were not responsible for the delay in the conduct … THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO (A) STRIKE DOWN PROVISIONS OF SECTION28A(5), 28-B(2) OF THE ACT AS BEING UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND UNWORKABLE AND ETC. IN W.P. NO.226141/2020 BETWEEN:1. VEERAREDDY S/O SIDRAM

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 16 2020

Sri.peeragond M Gadyal And Ors Vs. The State Of Karnataka And Ors

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

Decided on : Oct-16-2020

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the member of the board, due to any situation contemplated in any other Act which includes the Disaster Management Act, 2005 and thus the term of the members of the Board of management does not expire. It is precisely … of the Act and Rule 13-D of the Rules of 1960 and 68 therefore, the petitioners were not responsible for the delay in the conduct … THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO (A) STRIKE DOWN PROVISIONS OF SECTION28A(5), 28-B(2) OF THE ACT AS BEING UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND UNWORKABLE AND ETC. IN W.P. NO.226141/2020 BETWEEN:1. VEERAREDDY S/O SIDRAM

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 16 2020

Shri. H.kumarappa And Ors Vs. The State Of Karnataka And Ors

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

Decided on : Oct-16-2020

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the member of the board, due to any situation contemplated in any other Act which includes the Disaster Management Act, 2005 and thus the term of the members of the Board of management does not expire. It is precisely … of the Act and Rule 13-D of the Rules of 1960 and 68 therefore, the petitioners were not responsible for the delay in the conduct … THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO (A) STRIKE DOWN PROVISIONS OF SECTION28A(5), 28-B(2) OF THE ACT AS BEING UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND UNWORKABLE AND ETC. IN W.P. NO.226141/2020 BETWEEN:1. VEERAREDDY S/O SIDRAM

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 16 2020

Basavaraj And Ors Vs. The State Of Karnataka And Ors

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

Decided on : Oct-16-2020

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the member of the board, due to any situation contemplated in any other Act which includes the Disaster Management Act, 2005 and thus the term of the members of the Board of management does not expire. It is precisely … of the Act and Rule 13-D of the Rules of 1960 and 68 therefore, the petitioners were not responsible for the delay in the conduct … THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO (A) STRIKE DOWN PROVISIONS OF SECTION28A(5), 28-B(2) OF THE ACT AS BEING UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND UNWORKABLE AND ETC. IN W.P. NO.226141/2020 BETWEEN:1. VEERAREDDY S/O SIDRAM

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 16 2020

Ashok And Ors Vs. The State Of Karnataka And Ors

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

Decided on : Oct-16-2020

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the member of the board, due to any situation contemplated in any other Act which includes the Disaster Management Act, 2005 and thus the term of the members of the Board of management does not expire. It is precisely … of the Act and Rule 13-D of the Rules of 1960 and 68 therefore, the petitioners were not responsible for the delay in the conduct … THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO (A) STRIKE DOWN PROVISIONS OF SECTION28A(5), 28-B(2) OF THE ACT AS BEING UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND UNWORKABLE AND ETC. IN W.P. NO.226141/2020 BETWEEN:1. VEERAREDDY S/O SIDRAM

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 16 2020

Bheemaraya And Ors Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

Decided on : Oct-16-2020

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the member of the board, due to any situation contemplated in any other Act which includes the Disaster Management Act, 2005 and thus the term of the members of the Board of management does not expire. It is precisely … of the Act and Rule 13-D of the Rules of 1960 and 68 therefore, the petitioners were not responsible for the delay in the conduct … THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO (A) STRIKE DOWN PROVISIONS OF SECTION28A(5), 28-B(2) OF THE ACT AS BEING UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND UNWORKABLE AND ETC. IN W.P. NO.226141/2020 BETWEEN:1. VEERAREDDY S/O SIDRAM

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial