Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: disaster management act 2005 section 64 · Page 1 of about 128 results (0.065 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 01 2020

Gujarat Mazdoor Sabha Vs. The State of Gujarat

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-01-2020

Subject : Land Acquisition

to a sharp decline in economic activities. The Union Government has taken recourse to the provisions of the Disaster Management Act, 2005.12 However, it has not affected the security of India, or of a part of its territory in … Index A B C D E F G H I The Notifications Grounds of challenge The power under Section 5 of the Factories Act, 1962 Precedent on ‘public emergency’ and ‘security of the state’ Interpreting ‘public emergency’ … with its attendant shortages, bottlenecks and, in India, famine as well. Section 64(2) of the Factories Act envisages exemption from certain provisions relating to working

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 28 2020

Praneeth K Vs. University Grants Commission (Ugc)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-28-2020

Subject : Education

gravely from pandemic of COVID­19 and 15 respective State Governments have imposed/implemented various levels of lockdown under the Disaster Management Act, 2005. Petitioner pleads that as a result of the lockdown, Universities, schools, educational institutions were forced to shut down … that provisions of Disaster Management Act will have overriding effect. He placed reliance on Section 72 of the Act, 2005. Section 72 shall override not only the provisions of Maharashtra University Act but also University Grants Commission Act, 1956 … 1976 provided:­ “………Education including Universities, subject to the provisions of Entries 63, 64, 65 and 66 of List I and Entry 25 of List III”.48.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 18 2020

Centre for Public Interest Litigation Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-18-2020

Subject : Land Acquisition

effects of disasters and for undertaking a holistic, coordinated and prompt response to any disaster situation.” 4. The Disaster Management Act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as “Act, 2005”) was enacted to provide for the effective management of disasters and matters … impact on disaster risk, and facilitating, as appropriate, the participation of all sectors and relevant stakeholders;” 8. Although Section 11 of Act, 2005 contemplated preparation of a National Plan, however, the National Plan was not prepared till … 46 as well as new guidelines enforced with effect from financial year 64 2015-16 any person or institution can still make contribution to the NDRF.62.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 16 2020

Smt. Sunanda And Ors Vs. The State Of Karnataka And Ors

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

Decided on : Oct-16-2020

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the member of the board, due to any situation contemplated in any other Act which includes the Disaster Management Act, 2005 and thus the term of the members of the Board of management does not expire. It is precisely … contended that if the interpretation of the petitioners is accepted, then it 64 would be perpetuating the mischief that Section 28-A(5) sought to avoid. Further, … THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO (A) STRIKE DOWN PROVISIONS OF SECTION28A(5), 28-B(2) OF THE ACT AS BEING UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND UNWORKABLE AND ETC. IN W.P. NO.226141/2020 BETWEEN:1. VEERAREDDY S/O SIDRAM

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 16 2020

Gurunath Reddy And Ors Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

Decided on : Oct-16-2020

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the member of the board, due to any situation contemplated in any other Act which includes the Disaster Management Act, 2005 and thus the term of the members of the Board of management does not expire. It is precisely … contended that if the interpretation of the petitioners is accepted, then it 64 would be perpetuating the mischief that Section 28-A(5) sought to avoid. Further, … THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO (A) STRIKE DOWN PROVISIONS OF SECTION28A(5), 28-B(2) OF THE ACT AS BEING UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND UNWORKABLE AND ETC. IN W.P. NO.226141/2020 BETWEEN:1. VEERAREDDY S/O SIDRAM

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 16 2020

Gundappa And Ors Vs. The State Of Karnataka And Ors

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

Decided on : Oct-16-2020

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the member of the board, due to any situation contemplated in any other Act which includes the Disaster Management Act, 2005 and thus the term of the members of the Board of management does not expire. It is precisely … contended that if the interpretation of the petitioners is accepted, then it 64 would be perpetuating the mischief that Section 28-A(5) sought to avoid. Further, … THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO (A) STRIKE DOWN PROVISIONS OF SECTION28A(5), 28-B(2) OF THE ACT AS BEING UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND UNWORKABLE AND ETC. IN W.P. NO.226141/2020 BETWEEN:1. VEERAREDDY S/O SIDRAM

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 16 2020

Sri.peeragond M Gadyal And Ors Vs. The State Of Karnataka And Ors

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

Decided on : Oct-16-2020

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the member of the board, due to any situation contemplated in any other Act which includes the Disaster Management Act, 2005 and thus the term of the members of the Board of management does not expire. It is precisely … contended that if the interpretation of the petitioners is accepted, then it 64 would be perpetuating the mischief that Section 28-A(5) sought to avoid. Further, … THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO (A) STRIKE DOWN PROVISIONS OF SECTION28A(5), 28-B(2) OF THE ACT AS BEING UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND UNWORKABLE AND ETC. IN W.P. NO.226141/2020 BETWEEN:1. VEERAREDDY S/O SIDRAM

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 16 2020

Ashok And Ors Vs. The State Of Karnataka And Ors

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

Decided on : Oct-16-2020

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the member of the board, due to any situation contemplated in any other Act which includes the Disaster Management Act, 2005 and thus the term of the members of the Board of management does not expire. It is precisely … contended that if the interpretation of the petitioners is accepted, then it 64 would be perpetuating the mischief that Section 28-A(5) sought to avoid. Further, … THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO (A) STRIKE DOWN PROVISIONS OF SECTION28A(5), 28-B(2) OF THE ACT AS BEING UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND UNWORKABLE AND ETC. IN W.P. NO.226141/2020 BETWEEN:1. VEERAREDDY S/O SIDRAM

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 16 2020

Bheemaraya And Ors Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

Decided on : Oct-16-2020

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the member of the board, due to any situation contemplated in any other Act which includes the Disaster Management Act, 2005 and thus the term of the members of the Board of management does not expire. It is precisely … contended that if the interpretation of the petitioners is accepted, then it 64 would be perpetuating the mischief that Section 28-A(5) sought to avoid. Further, … THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO (A) STRIKE DOWN PROVISIONS OF SECTION28A(5), 28-B(2) OF THE ACT AS BEING UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND UNWORKABLE AND ETC. IN W.P. NO.226141/2020 BETWEEN:1. VEERAREDDY S/O SIDRAM

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 16 2020

Shivanand And Ors Vs. The State Of Karnataka And Ors

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

Decided on : Oct-16-2020

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the member of the board, due to any situation contemplated in any other Act which includes the Disaster Management Act, 2005 and thus the term of the members of the Board of management does not expire. It is precisely … contended that if the interpretation of the petitioners is accepted, then it 64 would be perpetuating the mischief that Section 28-A(5) sought to avoid. Further, … THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO (A) STRIKE DOWN PROVISIONS OF SECTION28A(5), 28-B(2) OF THE ACT AS BEING UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND UNWORKABLE AND ETC. IN W.P. NO.226141/2020 BETWEEN:1. VEERAREDDY S/O SIDRAM

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial