Advanced Search Results

M/s. Karimpanal Arcade Owner's Welfare Association represented by its ...

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

1. These writ petitions are filed questioning the proceedings initiated under the provisions of the Disaster Management Act 2005 (hereinafter referred to as the DM Act ). Since common questions of law are involved in all these … Survey No.560/364 of Vanchiyoor Village in Thiruvananthapuram Taluk, Thiruvananthapuram District. He has been served with a notice under Section 34(k) of the DM Act. Ext.P8 is the said notice. The notice directs him to show cause against proposed

State of Kerala Represented by its Chief Secretary to Government and O ...

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

short, the DDMA ) in reference to a disaster management, i.e., Whether in exercise of the power under Section 34 of the Disaster Management Act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as the 2005 Act ), the District Management Authority … Section 33 of the Act further throw sufficient light on the powers given to the authority under the Disaster Management Act, 2005. Section 33 of the Act empowers the District Authority to issue any direction to any Department of the District

Praneeth K Vs. University Grants Commission (Ugc)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

gravely from pandemic of COVID­19 and 15 respective State Governments have imposed/implemented various levels of lockdown under the Disaster Management Act, 2005. Petitioner pleads that as a result of the lockdown, Universities, schools, educational institutions were forced to shut down … that provisions of Disaster Management Act will have overriding effect. He placed reliance on Section 72 of the Act, 2005. Section 72 shall override not only the provisions of Maharashtra University Act but also University Grants Commission Act, 1956 … online mode of exams and also the infrastructural disparities. The office memorandum 34 issued by the Ministry of Human Resource Development dated 06.07.2020 is itself

Jijimol vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

hazardous to public and aggravate the effects of the disaster, as stated in Section 34 (k) of the Disaster Management Act 2005. However, there was no response from respondents 2 to 4 even after repeated requests. It is aggrieved by

Yamuna Bazar Residents Welfare Association vs Govt. of Nct of Delhi &a ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

setting aside the impugned notice dated 13.05.2026 11.05.2026, 08.05.2026, 07.05.2026 and 05.05.2026 issued under Section 34 of the Disaster Management Act, 2005;b. Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction restraining the Respondents, their officers, agents and all persons acting

Neethu T vs the District Collector

Court : Kerala

to the Chairman, Disaster Management Authority, conditions similar to those set out in the permit issued under the Disaster Management Act, 2005 (In short, the Act 2005) is necessary to prevent this utterly undesirable acts. Hence a condition is imposed … writ petitions. The counsels submitted that the Chairman, DistrictDisaster Management Authority passed the impugned orderinvoking the powers under Section 26(2), 30, 33 and 34 of the Act, 2005. The counsels for the petitioners submitted that the Chairman,

Sadasiva Kurup, vs the Kollam District Collector,

Court : Kerala

to the Chairman, Disaster Management Authority, conditions similar to those set out in the permit issued under the Disaster Management Act, 2005 (In short, the Act 2005) is necessary to prevent this utterly undesirable acts. Hence a condition is imposed … writ petitions. The counsels submitted that the Chairman, DistrictDisaster Management Authority passed the impugned orderinvoking the powers under Section 26(2), 30, 33 and 34 of the Act, 2005. The counsels for the petitioners submitted that the Chairman,

Abdul Jaleel vs State of Kerala Represented by Chief Secretary

Court : Kerala

to the Chairman, Disaster Management Authority, conditions similar to those set out in the permit issued under the Disaster Management Act, 2005 (In short, the Act 2005) is necessary to prevent this utterly undesirable acts. Hence a condition is imposed … writ petitions. The counsels submitted that the Chairman, DistrictDisaster Management Authority passed the impugned orderinvoking the powers under Section 26(2), 30, 33 and 34 of the Act, 2005. The counsels for the petitioners submitted that the Chairman,

Mini vs Represented by Chief Secretary

Court : Kerala

to the Chairman, Disaster Management Authority, conditions similar to those set out in the permit issued under the Disaster Management Act, 2005 (In short, the Act 2005) is necessary to prevent this utterly undesirable acts. Hence a condition is imposed … writ petitions. The counsels submitted that the Chairman, DistrictDisaster Management Authority passed the impugned orderinvoking the powers under Section 26(2), 30, 33 and 34 of the Act, 2005. The counsels for the petitioners submitted that the Chairman,

Chellappan Pillai vs District Geologist

Court : Kerala

to the Chairman, Disaster Management Authority, conditions similar to those set out in the permit issued under the Disaster Management Act, 2005 (In short, the Act 2005) is necessary to prevent this utterly undesirable acts. Hence a condition is imposed … writ petitions. The counsels submitted that the Chairman, DistrictDisaster Management Authority passed the impugned orderinvoking the powers under Section 26(2), 30, 33 and 34 of the Act, 2005. The counsels for the petitioners submitted that the Chairman,