Advanced Search Results

Act1: disaster management act 2005 section 28 · Page 1 of about 162 results (0.050 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

Feb 24 2021

Rachna Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-24-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

of their services and in the light of invocation of The Essential Services Maintenance Act, 1968 and The Disaster Management Act, 2005. There is no benefit 14 accruing to persons in essential services and public employment, consequent to the unlock … the changed situation, after there was a relaxation in the lockdown, ultimately 28 on 5th June, 2020 took a decision to hold the examination on … Rules which are identified and prescribed by the respective Cadre Controlling Authorities (CCAs) as per the provisions of Section 33 and 34 of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016. Only those category(ies) of disability(ies) mentioned

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 05 2016

State of Kerala Represented by its Chief Secretary to Government and O ...

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Apr-05-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

Section 33 of the Act further throw sufficient light on the powers given to the authority under the Disaster Management Act, 2005. Section 33 of the Act empowers the District Authority to issue any direction to any Department of the District … the buildings, the Government cannot be treated as the owner of the land or buildings above the Canal. 28. Learned Advocate General refuting the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in the settlement

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 16 2020

Smt. Sunanda And Ors Vs. The State Of Karnataka And Ors

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

Decided on : Oct-16-2020

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the member of the board, due to any situation contemplated in any other Act which includes the Disaster Management Act, 2005 and thus the term of the members of the Board of management does not expire. It is precisely … 226141/2020, 226146/2020, 226148/2020, 226194/2020, 226198/2020, 226205/2020, 226259/2020, 226271/2020, 226320/2020, 226338/2020 and 226341/2020 have challenged the Constitutional validity of Section 28-A(5) and Section 28-B(2) of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act of 1959’