Advanced Search Results

Rachna Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

of their services and in the light of invocation of The Essential Services Maintenance Act, 1968 and The Disaster Management Act, 2005. There is no benefit 14 accruing to persons in essential services and public employment, consequent to the unlock … instant case. For those who claim reservation vertical/ horizontal, they have numerous/unlimited 27 chances and are also entitled for age relaxations. Thus, the scheme takes … Rules which are identified and prescribed by the respective Cadre Controlling Authorities (CCAs) as per the provisions of Section 33 and 34 of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016. Only those category(ies) of disability(ies) mentioned

Centre for Public Interest Litigation Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

effects of disasters and for undertaking a holistic, coordinated and prompt response to any disaster situation.” 4. The Disaster Management Act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as “Act, 2005”) was enacted to provide for the effective management of disasters and matters … Policy and in consultation with the State Governments and expert bodies or 27 organizations in the field of disaster management to be approved by the … impact on disaster risk, and facilitating, as appropriate, the participation of all sectors and relevant stakeholders;” 8. Although Section 11 of Act, 2005 contemplated preparation of a National Plan, however, the National Plan was not prepared till

Swaraj Abhiyan Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

spirit expected of them on such a vital issue as risk management, drought assessment and drought management. The Disaster Management Act, 2005 17. The Disaster Management Act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as “the DM Act”) has been on the statute … a pity, particularly since the persons affected by a possible drought-like situation usually belong to the most vulnerable sections of society. The sound of silence coming from these States subjects the vulnerable to further distress. During the … 25th January, 2016 with officers of the Government of India and on 27th January, 2016 with officers of the State Governments.59. The response of Bihar

Swaraj Abhiyan Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the Government of India complying with all the provisions of the laws enacted by Parliament, namely, the Disaster Management Act, 2005, the National Food Security Act, 2013 and the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, 2005. This will, … to (f) xxxx (2) Effective implementation of sub-paragraph (1) shall be considered necessary for the purposes of the section 27 of the Act.23. The meat of the matter lies in three issues: (i) Informal capping of funds through

Jacob Puliyel Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

the circular dated 18.11.2021 are within the competence of the State in exercise of its powers under the Disaster Management Act, 2005 (hereinafter, the “DM Act”) and the Tamil Nadu Public Health Act, 1939. Section 76(2)(b) thereof empowers the State … public domain. III. Improper collection and reporting of AEFIs. IV. Vaccination of children. I. Vaccine Mandates A. Submissions 27. Mr. Bhushan submitted that there is nothing wrong in the Government encouraging the people to get vaccinated. However,

Neethu T vs the District Collector

Court : Kerala

to the Chairman, Disaster Management Authority, conditions similar to those set out in the permit issued under the Disaster Management Act, 2005 (In short, the Act 2005) is necessary to prevent this utterly undesirable acts. Hence a condition is imposed … writ petitions. The counsels submitted that the Chairman, DistrictDisaster Management Authority passed the impugned orderinvoking the powers under Section 26(2), 30, 33 and 34 of the Act, 2005. The counsels for the petitioners submitted that the Chairman, … THE 19TH DAY OF JULY 2022 / 28TH ASHADHA, 1944 WP(C) NO. 27461 OF 2021 PETITIONER/S: BIJU KUMAR, AGED 45 YEARS S/O. NARAYANAKURUP, VAVAYIL HOUSE,

Sadasiva Kurup, vs the Kollam District Collector,

Court : Kerala

to the Chairman, Disaster Management Authority, conditions similar to those set out in the permit issued under the Disaster Management Act, 2005 (In short, the Act 2005) is necessary to prevent this utterly undesirable acts. Hence a condition is imposed … writ petitions. The counsels submitted that the Chairman, DistrictDisaster Management Authority passed the impugned orderinvoking the powers under Section 26(2), 30, 33 and 34 of the Act, 2005. The counsels for the petitioners submitted that the Chairman, … THE 19TH DAY OF JULY 2022 / 28TH ASHADHA, 1944 WP(C) NO. 27461 OF 2021 PETITIONER/S: BIJU KUMAR, AGED 45 YEARS S/O. NARAYANAKURUP, VAVAYIL HOUSE,

Abdul Jaleel vs State of Kerala Represented by Chief Secretary

Court : Kerala

to the Chairman, Disaster Management Authority, conditions similar to those set out in the permit issued under the Disaster Management Act, 2005 (In short, the Act 2005) is necessary to prevent this utterly undesirable acts. Hence a condition is imposed … writ petitions. The counsels submitted that the Chairman, DistrictDisaster Management Authority passed the impugned orderinvoking the powers under Section 26(2), 30, 33 and 34 of the Act, 2005. The counsels for the petitioners submitted that the Chairman, … THE 19TH DAY OF JULY 2022 / 28TH ASHADHA, 1944 WP(C) NO. 27461 OF 2021 PETITIONER/S: BIJU KUMAR, AGED 45 YEARS S/O. NARAYANAKURUP, VAVAYIL HOUSE,

Mini vs Represented by Chief Secretary

Court : Kerala

to the Chairman, Disaster Management Authority, conditions similar to those set out in the permit issued under the Disaster Management Act, 2005 (In short, the Act 2005) is necessary to prevent this utterly undesirable acts. Hence a condition is imposed … writ petitions. The counsels submitted that the Chairman, DistrictDisaster Management Authority passed the impugned orderinvoking the powers under Section 26(2), 30, 33 and 34 of the Act, 2005. The counsels for the petitioners submitted that the Chairman, … THE 19TH DAY OF JULY 2022 / 28TH ASHADHA, 1944 WP(C) NO. 27461 OF 2021 PETITIONER/S: BIJU KUMAR, AGED 45 YEARS S/O. NARAYANAKURUP, VAVAYIL HOUSE,

Chellappan Pillai vs District Geologist

Court : Kerala

to the Chairman, Disaster Management Authority, conditions similar to those set out in the permit issued under the Disaster Management Act, 2005 (In short, the Act 2005) is necessary to prevent this utterly undesirable acts. Hence a condition is imposed … writ petitions. The counsels submitted that the Chairman, DistrictDisaster Management Authority passed the impugned orderinvoking the powers under Section 26(2), 30, 33 and 34 of the Act, 2005. The counsels for the petitioners submitted that the Chairman, … THE 19TH DAY OF JULY 2022 / 28TH ASHADHA, 1944 WP(C) NO. 27461 OF 2021 PETITIONER/S: BIJU KUMAR, AGED 45 YEARS S/O. NARAYANAKURUP, VAVAYIL HOUSE,