Advanced Search Results

Micolube India Limited Vs. Rakesh Kumar Trading as Saurabh Industries ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property

suit for infringement of registered design is maintainable against the another registered proprietor of the design under the Designs Act, 2000; (2) Whether there can be availability of remedy of passing off in the absence of express saving or … employ an argent residing in India; (c) the personal signature or presence of any applicant or other person. Section 46 defines that notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, the Controller shall(a) Not disclose any information relating to the

A.Ruthramoorthy Trading as M/s. Bharani Engineering Work Vs P.Moorthy

Court : Chennai

that copyright shall not subsist under the Copyright Act in respect of anydesign which is registered under the Designs Act, 2000 ('Designs Act'). Learned counsel next referred to the examination report of the Copyright Office dated 08.06.2023, wherein the … earlier judgment. By drawing specific reference to paragraphs 29 to 32 and 46 thereof, learned counsel submitted that the interplay between the Copyright Act and … Delhi-110 078, India. ... Respondents Prayer: Original Petition (Copyright) filed for rectification of Copyright from the Register under Section 50 of the Copyright Act,1957 read with Rule 6 of the Madras High Court Intellectual property Rights division

Union of India Vs. M/S g.s. Chatha Rice Mills

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Interpreting ‘day’ and ‘date’ Notification under Section 8A of the Customs Tariff Act General Clauses Act Information Technology Act, 2000 Effect of notifications issued in e-gazettes Retrospectivity Summation 6 PART A1A2Leave granted. The aftermath of Pulwama A terrorist … pay the duty applicable at the time when the bills of entry for home consumption were filed under Section 46 of the 8 PART B Customs Act, 1962.1 The Union of India was ordered to release the goods … record shall be determined as follows, namely:- (a) if the addressee has designated a computer resource for the purpose of receiving electronic records,- (i) receipt

Tracators and Farm Equipment vs Standarad Corpn. India Ltd.

Court : Chennai

is raised by stating that the copyright in any design, which is capable of being registered under the Designs Act, 2000 (the Designs Act) but was not so registered, shall cease as soon as the article to which the … examination of DW1. With specific reference to questions 38 to 43 and 46 to 51 and the answers thereto, he contended that DW1 admitted that … filed under Order IV Rule 1 of Original Side Rules and Order VII Rule 1 CPC read with Sections 51, 55 and 62 of the Copyrights Act, 1957 praying that this Court may be pleased to grant

Carlsberg Breweries a/S vs.som Distilleries and Breweries Limited

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property

of its product, viz. beer, under the brand “TUBORG”, design whereof is registered under the provisions of the Designs Act, 2000. The novelty of the applicant’s registered design resides in the shape and configuration of the bottle.3. The plaintiff … a fraudulent imitation of the plaintiff’s registered bottle design which is liable to be injuncted by virtue of section 22 of the Designs Act, 2000. He submits that the copy must be a fraudulent or obvious imitation … I.A. No.10972/2015 in C.S. (OS) No.1485/2015 Page 27 of 119 Defendant’s submissions 46. The application is opposed by the defendant. Ms. Pratibha Singh, learned senior

j.c. Bamford Excavators Limited & Anr. Vs.bull Machines Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

of drawings were functional items and would not qualify for registration of designs under Section 2(b) of the Designs Act, 2000. It was further claimed that the drawings had been specifically developed to increase the efficiency of finished products. … intended to provide industrial and commercial application of an artistic work for commerce lesser protection. xxxx xxxx xxxx 46. We thus summarize our findings as follows: - a. The definition of 'artistic work' has a very wide

Carlsberg Breweries a/S vs.som Distilleries and Breweries Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

provision obtaining in the Designs Act, i.e., the Act of 2000. The learned Single Judge, while interpreting old Section 53 (now Section22) came to the conclusion that since both the plaintiff and defendant No.1 were proprietors of … the action under the Designs Act when the same is mutually inconsistent with that of remedy under the Designs Act, 2000?.The majority in Mohan Lal (supra) held that as the cause of action for a suit for infringement of … can be clubbed together as a composite suit.” CS (COMM) 690/2018 Page 46 of 67 (Underlining Added) 4. In order to understand the aforesaid observations

Nariman Point Association and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 22, 31(1) and 31(6); Development Control Regulation - Regulation 9

Reported in : 2003(2)ALLMR930; 2003(5)BomCR273; 2003(3)MhLj68

for the sanction of the Government. Eventually, by notifications dated 3rd June, 2000 and 17th June, 2001, the Government of Maharashtra sanctioned the draft development … on Development upon the declaration of intent to prepare a Development Plan. The Planning Authority is required by Section 46 to have regard to the provisions of any Draft, or final plan or proposals in considering an application … dated 21st August, 1997). The obligations of the successful tenderer would inter alia, comprise of the following :(i) Designing and construction of a multistoreyed car park of a built up area not exceeding 17,500 sq.mtrs. with a … the provisions of Section 40(1)(c) of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 ('the Act'). By a notification dated 1st March, 1985 (and a

Pranda Jewelry Pvt. Ltd. and Others Vs. Aarya 24 kt and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

The definition of 'Design' in the Designs Act, 1911 is different from the definition of 'Design' in the Designs Act, 2000. Section 2(d) of the Designs Act, 2000 does not include any 'artistic work' as defined in clause (c) of

Metal Impacts Pvt. Ltd., Represented by Its Representative Senior Sale ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code Of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 7 Rule 1, Order 7 Rule 2; Designs Act 2000 - Sections 22, 19(1), 2, 4; Companies Act, 1956; Designs Act, 1999

Reported in : 2012(2)KCCR853; 2012(3)CTC(IP)15

(Prayer: This plaint filed under order VII Rule 1 and 2 of CPC r/w Section 22 of Designs Act 2000 before the Additional City Civil Judge, Mayohall Unit, Bangalore, registered as Original Suit No.15349 of 2006 and transferred … concealed the material facts from the Registrar that the said registered designs have been in use since last 46 years unhindered all over the world. The plaintiff is engaged in the business of all kinds of collapsible