Advanced Search Results

Rotela Auto Components (P) Ltd. and anr. Vs. Jaspal Singh and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Designs Act, 2000 - Sections 4, 9, 10(4), 19, 22, 22(2), 22(3) and 38; Designs Act, 1911 - Sections 51A and 53; Patents Act - Sections 64 and 107

Reported in : 95(2002)DLT830

that plaintiffs are manufacturing unique and distinctive locks since the period of its registration under the provisions of Designs Act, 2000. Some of the salient features of the plaintiffs Top Open Locks are as under:-a) Top View: (i) It … of confirming the injunction and that would be the effect of Sub-section 4 of Section 10 read with Section 38 of the Designs Act with regard to evidential value of such certificate of registration. Mr. Bhardwaj contended that

Dart Industries Inc. and anr. Vs. Techno Plast and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Designs Act, 2000 - Sections 2, 4, 11, 18, 19, 20, 22, 22(2)(3), 22(3) and 29; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 13, 14, 15, 17, 45, 51, 53 and 55; Designs Rules, 2001; Designs Act, 1911; Patent Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : 2007(35)PTC285(Del)

this case who have filed this suit for permanent injunction against the defendants under Section 22 of the Designs Act, 2000 read with Section 55 of the Copyright Act, 1957. The plaintiff No. 1 is a company incorporated under … 4MODULAR MATE Pg 126OVAL7. CRYSTAL SHEER 172739/Dt-29-11-1996 100, 101, -- 36, 37, TUMBLER WITH Pg 128 102, 103 38, 39, 40 LID8. CLASSIC 176605/Dt-5-06-1998 99 8, 36 244 to 247, 131SLIM LUNCH Pg 1309. 'EXECUTIE 185958/Dt. 5-07-2001

Pranda Jewelry Pvt. Ltd. and Others Vs. Aarya 24 kt and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

The definition of 'Design' in the Designs Act, 1911 is different from the definition of 'Design' in the Designs Act, 2000. Section 2(d) of the Designs Act, 2000 does not include any 'artistic work' as defined in clause (c) of … protection under the Designs Act qua the product created from the artistic work when industrially applied. 37. ….. 38. Thus, while it is not open to the respondent to reproduce such paintings per se, which formed the

Sparejon Samuel Vs. The Director of Town and Country Planning and Anot ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Section 38 of the Act, and the properties are deemed to be released from such reservation, allotment or designation. The relevant portion of the said judgment reads as follows:- "8. Likewise, Section 36 of Act 35 of … view taken by this Court in various cases also. In W.P.No.5630 of 2000 (SV.P.N.S.S.Sivaramalingam Vs. Commissioner, Virudhunagar Municipality and another) K.P.SIVASUBRAMANIAM,J by order dated 20.02.2001, … widening the BB Scheme Road under the Nagercoil Detailed Development Plan No.III as lapsed in the light of Section 38 of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971 (TN Act 35 of 1974).) 1. This is

G.Raghu Babu vs Muralikrishnan

Court : Chennai

his novel and innovative design vide application No. 297504 in class 12-05 dated 13/09/2017 under the provisions of Designs Act, 2000. The said design registration is valid till 2.9. Hence, it is clear that the Appellant is the proprietor … Designs Act particularly Sections 2, 9 to 11, 17, 18, 22 and 38 which reads as follows: “2. Definitions.-In this Act, unless there is anything … Vinoth Brick Works, Z-275, 5th Avenue, Anna Nagar, Chennai - 600 047. ... RespondentsAppeal Suit is filed under Section 96 r/w. Order XLI, Rule 1 and 2 of Civil Procedure Code praying to set aside the judgment

Crocs Inc Usa vs.action Shoes Pvt Ltd & Anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property

571/2017 Page 6 of 45 10. It was further enquired from the counsel for the plaintiff, that the Designs Act 2000, as per its preamble being an Act to consolidate and amend the law relating to protection of designs, … 1999 Act would be immaterial. J.Even otherwise, the consistent principle of construction of statutes and enunciated, earlier in Section 38 of the Interpretation Act, 1850 and reiterated in some modification in Section 8 of the General Clauses Act,

Crocs Inc Usa vs.bioworld Merchandising India Limited

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property

571/2017 Page 6 of 45 10. It was further enquired from the counsel for the plaintiff, that the Designs Act 2000, as per its preamble being an Act to consolidate and amend the law relating to protection of designs, … 1999 Act would be immaterial. J.Even otherwise, the consistent principle of construction of statutes and enunciated, earlier in Section 38 of the Interpretation Act, 1850 and reiterated in some modification in Section 8 of the General Clauses Act,

Crocs Inc. Usa vs.aqualite India Limited and Anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property

571/2017 Page 6 of 45 10. It was further enquired from the counsel for the plaintiff, that the Designs Act 2000, as per its preamble being an Act to consolidate and amend the law relating to protection of designs, … 1999 Act would be immaterial. J.Even otherwise, the consistent principle of construction of statutes and enunciated, earlier in Section 38 of the Interpretation Act, 1850 and reiterated in some modification in Section 8 of the General Clauses Act,

Crocs Inc Usa vs.bata India Ltd & Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property

571/2017 Page 6 of 45 10. It was further enquired from the counsel for the plaintiff, that the Designs Act 2000, as per its preamble being an Act to consolidate and amend the law relating to protection of designs, … 1999 Act would be immaterial. J.Even otherwise, the consistent principle of construction of statutes and enunciated, earlier in Section 38 of the Interpretation Act, 1850 and reiterated in some modification in Section 8 of the General Clauses Act,

Crocs Inc Usa vs.relaxo Footwear Ltd

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property

571/2017 Page 6 of 45 10. It was further enquired from the counsel for the plaintiff, that the Designs Act 2000, as per its preamble being an Act to consolidate and amend the law relating to protection of designs, … 1999 Act would be immaterial. J.Even otherwise, the consistent principle of construction of statutes and enunciated, earlier in Section 38 of the Interpretation Act, 1850 and reiterated in some modification in Section 8 of the General Clauses Act,