Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: designs act 2000 section 30 · Page 1 of about 5,599 results (0.081 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 08 2013

Sabmiller India Limited (Formerly Skol Breweries Ltd.) Vs. Som Distill ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-08-2013

Subject : Education

its bottles to be used for selling beer and applied for registration of the said design under the Designs Act, 2000, in Class 09-01 which design was registered on 15th January 2010 under No. 223479. In the meantime, on … continue using the registered trade mark of the Plaintiff because such use is protected by the provisions of Section 30 (1) of the Act and also in view of the provisions of Section 30 (2) of the Act.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 11 2019

Anurag Sanghi & Anr. Vs.m/s Knitpro International

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jun-11-2019

Subject : Intellectual Property

of the ADJ at Patiala House Court, New Delhi was transferred in terms of Section 22(4) of the Designs Act, 2000 to this Court vide order dated 12.04.2018 of the learned ADJ-04, PHC, New Delhi in view of the … awaited. TRP (C) 93 & 94/2017 Page 4 of 27 Furthermore, in TR.P (C) 15/2015 vide proceedings dated 30.07.2015 it is indicated that the said transfer petition was filed by the present petitioners against the same respondent

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 10 2002

J. Jayalalitha Vs. State Represented by Superintendent of Police, Spec ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-10-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 13(1), 13(2) and 16; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 2, 61, 158, 161, 166A, 169, 170, 173,173(1), 173(2), 173(6), 173(8), 218, 223, 319 and 482; General Clauses Act - Sections 3; (38);Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 33, 109 and 120B

Reported in : 2002CriLJ3026

Ms.N.Sassikala, Mr.Vn.Sudhagaran, and Ms.Ilavarasi, A2, A3 and A4 respectively, in Spl.C.C.No.7 of 1997 on the file of the Designated Court; (ii)Referring to the F.I.R. dated 2.9.2000 in F.I.R. No.2/AC/2000/HQ, as well as the consequential charge sheet dated … (ii) The officer shall also communicate, in such manner as may be prescribed by the State Government, the action taken by him to the person, if any; by whom the information relating to the commission of the … to the procedure to be followed after the further investigation permitted under Section 173(8) of Code of Criminal Procedure with reference to the evidence gathered … during her tenure as Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu from 1.7.1991 to 30.4.1996, had entered into criminal conspiracy with her close associate, viz., the petitioner

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 16 2017

Atul Narsibhai Patel Vs. Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs a ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Feb-16-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Parties Atul Narsibhai Patel Vs. Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs and Anr.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 23 2014

Lupin Ltd. and Another Vs. Johnson and Johnson and Another

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-23-2014

Subject : Intellectual Property

Trademarks Act with the provisions of the Designs Act and the Patents Act. It is submitted that the Designs Act, 2000 [Section 22(4) read with Section 19] and the Patents Act [Section 10 read with Section 64] (unlike Trademarks Act) … mark likely to be taken as being used as a trade mark. (2) to (9) ….. ….. …..” Section 30 permits use of a registered trade mark in certain circumstances. Section 31 is important and is required to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 18 2019

Crocs Inc Usa vs.action Shoes Pvt Ltd & Anr

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-18-2019

Subject : Intellectual Property

571/2017 Page 6 of 45 10. It was further enquired from the counsel for the plaintiff, that the Designs Act 2000, as per its preamble being an Act to consolidate and amend the law relating to protection of designs, … CS(COMM) Nos.903/2018, 905/2016, 906/2016, 1415/2016, 569/2017 & 571/2017 Page 20 of 45 30. The remaining arguments of Mr. Jayant Mehta, Advocate common to all suits, … prior to codification, of shape/design as a trade mark.14. The counsel for the plaintiff next drew attention to Section 27(2) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 but which merely provides that nothing contained therein shall affect rights

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 18 2019

Crocs Inc Usa vs.bioworld Merchandising India Limited

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-18-2019

Subject : Intellectual Property

571/2017 Page 6 of 45 10. It was further enquired from the counsel for the plaintiff, that the Designs Act 2000, as per its preamble being an Act to consolidate and amend the law relating to protection of designs, … CS(COMM) Nos.903/2018, 905/2016, 906/2016, 1415/2016, 569/2017 & 571/2017 Page 20 of 45 30. The remaining arguments of Mr. Jayant Mehta, Advocate common to all suits, … prior to codification, of shape/design as a trade mark.14. The counsel for the plaintiff next drew attention to Section 27(2) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 but which merely provides that nothing contained therein shall affect rights

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 18 2019

Crocs Inc. Usa vs.aqualite India Limited and Anr

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-18-2019

Subject : Intellectual Property

571/2017 Page 6 of 45 10. It was further enquired from the counsel for the plaintiff, that the Designs Act 2000, as per its preamble being an Act to consolidate and amend the law relating to protection of designs, … CS(COMM) Nos.903/2018, 905/2016, 906/2016, 1415/2016, 569/2017 & 571/2017 Page 20 of 45 30. The remaining arguments of Mr. Jayant Mehta, Advocate common to all suits, … prior to codification, of shape/design as a trade mark.14. The counsel for the plaintiff next drew attention to Section 27(2) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 but which merely provides that nothing contained therein shall affect rights

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 18 2019

Crocs Inc Usa vs.bata India Ltd & Ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-18-2019

Subject : Intellectual Property

571/2017 Page 6 of 45 10. It was further enquired from the counsel for the plaintiff, that the Designs Act 2000, as per its preamble being an Act to consolidate and amend the law relating to protection of designs, … CS(COMM) Nos.903/2018, 905/2016, 906/2016, 1415/2016, 569/2017 & 571/2017 Page 20 of 45 30. The remaining arguments of Mr. Jayant Mehta, Advocate common to all suits, … prior to codification, of shape/design as a trade mark.14. The counsel for the plaintiff next drew attention to Section 27(2) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 but which merely provides that nothing contained therein shall affect rights

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 18 2019

Crocs Inc Usa vs.relaxo Footwear Ltd

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-18-2019

Subject : Intellectual Property

571/2017 Page 6 of 45 10. It was further enquired from the counsel for the plaintiff, that the Designs Act 2000, as per its preamble being an Act to consolidate and amend the law relating to protection of designs, … CS(COMM) Nos.903/2018, 905/2016, 906/2016, 1415/2016, 569/2017 & 571/2017 Page 20 of 45 30. The remaining arguments of Mr. Jayant Mehta, Advocate common to all suits, … prior to codification, of shape/design as a trade mark.14. The counsel for the plaintiff next drew attention to Section 27(2) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 but which merely provides that nothing contained therein shall affect rights

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial