Advanced Search Results
Sabmiller India Limited (Formerly Skol Breweries Ltd.) Vs. Som Distill ...
Mumbai
Feb-08-2013
Education
its bottles to be used for selling beer and applied for registration of the said design under the Designs Act, 2000, in Class 09-01 which design was registered on 15th January 2010 under No. 223479. In the meantime, on … continue using the registered trade mark of the Plaintiff because such use is protected by the provisions of Section 30 (1) of the Act and also in view of the provisions of Section 30 (2) of the Act.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAnurag Sanghi & Anr. Vs.m/s Knitpro International
Delhi
Jun-11-2019
Intellectual Property
of the ADJ at Patiala House Court, New Delhi was transferred in terms of Section 22(4) of the Designs Act, 2000 to this Court vide order dated 12.04.2018 of the learned ADJ-04, PHC, New Delhi in view of the … awaited. TRP (C) 93 & 94/2017 Page 4 of 27 Furthermore, in TR.P (C) 15/2015 vide proceedings dated 30.07.2015 it is indicated that the said transfer petition was filed by the present petitioners against the same respondent
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJ. Jayalalitha Vs. State Represented by Superintendent of Police, Spec ...
Chennai
Jan-10-2002
Criminal
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 13(1), 13(2) and 16; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 2, 61, 158, 161, 166A, 169, 170, 173,173(1), 173(2), 173(6), 173(8), 218, 223, 319 and 482; General Clauses Act - Sections 3; (38);Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 33, 109 and 120B
2002CriLJ3026
Ms.N.Sassikala, Mr.Vn.Sudhagaran, and Ms.Ilavarasi, A2, A3 and A4 respectively, in Spl.C.C.No.7 of 1997 on the file of the Designated Court; (ii)Referring to the F.I.R. dated 2.9.2000 in F.I.R. No.2/AC/2000/HQ, as well as the consequential charge sheet dated … (ii) The officer shall also communicate, in such manner as may be prescribed by the State Government, the action taken by him to the person, if any; by whom the information relating to the commission of the … to the procedure to be followed after the further investigation permitted under Section 173(8) of Code of Criminal Procedure with reference to the evidence gathered … during her tenure as Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu from 1.7.1991 to 30.4.1996, had entered into criminal conspiracy with her close associate, viz., the petitioner
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Atul Narsibhai Patel Vs. Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs a ...
Kolkata
Feb-16-2017
Land Acquisition
Matched in: Parties Atul Narsibhai Patel Vs. Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs and Anr.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLupin Ltd. and Another Vs. Johnson and Johnson and Another
Mumbai
Dec-23-2014
Intellectual Property
Trademarks Act with the provisions of the Designs Act and the Patents Act. It is submitted that the Designs Act, 2000 [Section 22(4) read with Section 19] and the Patents Act [Section 10 read with Section 64] (unlike Trademarks Act) … mark likely to be taken as being used as a trade mark. (2) to (9) ….. ….. …..” Section 30 permits use of a registered trade mark in certain circumstances. Section 31 is important and is required to
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCrocs Inc Usa vs.action Shoes Pvt Ltd & Anr
Delhi
Feb-18-2019
Intellectual Property
571/2017 Page 6 of 45 10. It was further enquired from the counsel for the plaintiff, that the Designs Act 2000, as per its preamble being an Act to consolidate and amend the law relating to protection of designs, … CS(COMM) Nos.903/2018, 905/2016, 906/2016, 1415/2016, 569/2017 & 571/2017 Page 20 of 45 30. The remaining arguments of Mr. Jayant Mehta, Advocate common to all suits, … prior to codification, of shape/design as a trade mark.14. The counsel for the plaintiff next drew attention to Section 27(2) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 but which merely provides that nothing contained therein shall affect rights
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCrocs Inc Usa vs.bioworld Merchandising India Limited
Delhi
Feb-18-2019
Intellectual Property
571/2017 Page 6 of 45 10. It was further enquired from the counsel for the plaintiff, that the Designs Act 2000, as per its preamble being an Act to consolidate and amend the law relating to protection of designs, … CS(COMM) Nos.903/2018, 905/2016, 906/2016, 1415/2016, 569/2017 & 571/2017 Page 20 of 45 30. The remaining arguments of Mr. Jayant Mehta, Advocate common to all suits, … prior to codification, of shape/design as a trade mark.14. The counsel for the plaintiff next drew attention to Section 27(2) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 but which merely provides that nothing contained therein shall affect rights
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCrocs Inc. Usa vs.aqualite India Limited and Anr
Delhi
Feb-18-2019
Intellectual Property
571/2017 Page 6 of 45 10. It was further enquired from the counsel for the plaintiff, that the Designs Act 2000, as per its preamble being an Act to consolidate and amend the law relating to protection of designs, … CS(COMM) Nos.903/2018, 905/2016, 906/2016, 1415/2016, 569/2017 & 571/2017 Page 20 of 45 30. The remaining arguments of Mr. Jayant Mehta, Advocate common to all suits, … prior to codification, of shape/design as a trade mark.14. The counsel for the plaintiff next drew attention to Section 27(2) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 but which merely provides that nothing contained therein shall affect rights
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCrocs Inc Usa vs.bata India Ltd & Ors
Delhi
Feb-18-2019
Intellectual Property
571/2017 Page 6 of 45 10. It was further enquired from the counsel for the plaintiff, that the Designs Act 2000, as per its preamble being an Act to consolidate and amend the law relating to protection of designs, … CS(COMM) Nos.903/2018, 905/2016, 906/2016, 1415/2016, 569/2017 & 571/2017 Page 20 of 45 30. The remaining arguments of Mr. Jayant Mehta, Advocate common to all suits, … prior to codification, of shape/design as a trade mark.14. The counsel for the plaintiff next drew attention to Section 27(2) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 but which merely provides that nothing contained therein shall affect rights
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCrocs Inc Usa vs.relaxo Footwear Ltd
Delhi
Feb-18-2019
Intellectual Property
571/2017 Page 6 of 45 10. It was further enquired from the counsel for the plaintiff, that the Designs Act 2000, as per its preamble being an Act to consolidate and amend the law relating to protection of designs, … CS(COMM) Nos.903/2018, 905/2016, 906/2016, 1415/2016, 569/2017 & 571/2017 Page 20 of 45 30. The remaining arguments of Mr. Jayant Mehta, Advocate common to all suits, … prior to codification, of shape/design as a trade mark.14. The counsel for the plaintiff next drew attention to Section 27(2) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 but which merely provides that nothing contained therein shall affect rights
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »