Advanced Search Results

Daniel Vs. A.R. Safiullah

Court : Chennai

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Designs Act, 2000 - Sections 19, 19(2), 19(3), 22 and 22(4); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 24 and 24(5) - Order 7, Rule 1; Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 27, 105 and 106

Reported in : (2004)2MLJ91; 2004(29)PTC62(Mad)

the Court of Principal District Judge, Pudukottai to this Court, as provided both under Section 22(4) of the Designs Act, 2000 and also under Section 24(5) of the C.P.C.2. Application No. 4459 of 2003 has been filed praying to

Microfibres Inc. Vs. Girdhar and Co. and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 6, 11, 13, 13(2), 14, 15, 15(1), 15(2), 16, 22, 40, 63, 67; Copyright Act, 1967 - Sections 15; Designs Act, 2000 - Sections 2, 4, 11(2), 12 and 19(1); Design Act of 1911 - Sections 2(5); Patent and Designs Act; Patent Act; Trade Marks Act; U.K. Designs Act, 1949 - Sections 1(3); Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 2(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 415, 420 and 479; New Design Rules, 2001; Copyright Law

Reported in : LC2009(2)229; 2009(40)PTC519(Del)

that the learned Single Judge held that the designs in question were capable of being registered under the Designs Act, 2000 and consequently the appellant was not entitled to seek protection under the copyright law as the designs had … Dart Industries Inc. and FAO (OS) No. 447/2008 filed by Mattel Inc., on the question of interpretation of Section 2(c) of the Copyright Act read with Section 2(d) of the Designs Act and Section 15(2) of the … Even the Trade Marks Act provided for registration of fabrics/textiles in Class 24. What was required to determine the capacity of being registered under the

Carlsberg Breweries a/S vs.som Distilleries and Breweries Limited

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property

of its product, viz. beer, under the brand “TUBORG”, design whereof is registered under the provisions of the Designs Act, 2000. The novelty of the applicant’s registered design resides in the shape and configuration of the bottle.3. The plaintiff … a fraudulent imitation of the plaintiff’s registered bottle design which is liable to be injuncted by virtue of section 22 of the Designs Act, 2000. He submits that the copy must be a fraudulent or obvious imitation … Special Leave petition is disposed of in the above terms”. (emphasis supplied) 24. It is in the aforesaid background that the present application has been

Crocs Inc Usa vs.action Shoes Pvt Ltd & Anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property

571/2017 Page 6 of 45 10. It was further enquired from the counsel for the plaintiff, that the Designs Act 2000, as per its preamble being an Act to consolidate and amend the law relating to protection of designs, … prior to codification, of shape/design as a trade mark.14. The counsel for the plaintiff next drew attention to Section 27(2) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 but which merely provides that nothing contained therein shall affect rights … of infringement of design and which appeal has also been dismissed on 24th January, 2019; and, (vii) however, it is the contention of the plaintiff

Crocs Inc Usa vs.bioworld Merchandising India Limited

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property

571/2017 Page 6 of 45 10. It was further enquired from the counsel for the plaintiff, that the Designs Act 2000, as per its preamble being an Act to consolidate and amend the law relating to protection of designs, … prior to codification, of shape/design as a trade mark.14. The counsel for the plaintiff next drew attention to Section 27(2) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 but which merely provides that nothing contained therein shall affect rights … of infringement of design and which appeal has also been dismissed on 24th January, 2019; and, (vii) however, it is the contention of the plaintiff

Crocs Inc. Usa vs.aqualite India Limited and Anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property

571/2017 Page 6 of 45 10. It was further enquired from the counsel for the plaintiff, that the Designs Act 2000, as per its preamble being an Act to consolidate and amend the law relating to protection of designs, … prior to codification, of shape/design as a trade mark.14. The counsel for the plaintiff next drew attention to Section 27(2) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 but which merely provides that nothing contained therein shall affect rights … of infringement of design and which appeal has also been dismissed on 24th January, 2019; and, (vii) however, it is the contention of the plaintiff

Crocs Inc Usa vs.bata India Ltd & Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property

571/2017 Page 6 of 45 10. It was further enquired from the counsel for the plaintiff, that the Designs Act 2000, as per its preamble being an Act to consolidate and amend the law relating to protection of designs, … prior to codification, of shape/design as a trade mark.14. The counsel for the plaintiff next drew attention to Section 27(2) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 but which merely provides that nothing contained therein shall affect rights … of infringement of design and which appeal has also been dismissed on 24th January, 2019; and, (vii) however, it is the contention of the plaintiff

Crocs Inc Usa vs.relaxo Footwear Ltd

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property

571/2017 Page 6 of 45 10. It was further enquired from the counsel for the plaintiff, that the Designs Act 2000, as per its preamble being an Act to consolidate and amend the law relating to protection of designs, … prior to codification, of shape/design as a trade mark.14. The counsel for the plaintiff next drew attention to Section 27(2) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 but which merely provides that nothing contained therein shall affect rights … of infringement of design and which appeal has also been dismissed on 24th January, 2019; and, (vii) however, it is the contention of the plaintiff

Crocs Inc. Usa vs.liberty Shoes Ltd & Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property

571/2017 Page 6 of 45 10. It was further enquired from the counsel for the plaintiff, that the Designs Act 2000, as per its preamble being an Act to consolidate and amend the law relating to protection of designs, … prior to codification, of shape/design as a trade mark.14. The counsel for the plaintiff next drew attention to Section 27(2) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 but which merely provides that nothing contained therein shall affect rights … of infringement of design and which appeal has also been dismissed on 24th January, 2019; and, (vii) however, it is the contention of the plaintiff

Cryogas Equipment Private Limited versus Inox India Limited and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025] 4 S.C.R. 765

Commercial Court and thus rejecting the application u/Or.VII, R.11 of the CPC.Headnotes† Copyright Act, 1957 - s.15(2) - Designs Act, 2000 - s.2(d) - What are the parameters for determining whether a work or an article falls within the … Act, 2000; Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958; English Registered Designs Act, 1949; Penal Code, 1860.List of Keywords Section 15(2) of Copyright Act, 1957; Section 2(d) of Design Act, 2000; Design; Rejection of plaint; Order VII, Rule … Co., 2009 SCC OnLine Del 1647; Pranda Jewelry Pvt. Ltd. v. Aarya 24 KT, 2015 SCC OnLine Bom 958; Fun World and Resorts (India) Pvt.