Advanced Search Results

Astral Polytechnik Limited Represented by Its Chief Finance Officer Vs ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Indian Designs Act, 2000 - Sections 19, 19(1), 19(2), 22, 22(1), 22(2), 22(3) and 22(4)

Reported in : ILR2008KAR2533; 2009(3)KarLJ623; 2008(3)KCCR1957; 2008(5)AIRKarR198; AIR2008NOC2538

products, they urged the grounds on which the registration of the plaintiff's design ought to be cancelled under Section 19 of the Designs Act, 2000. It is thereafter, they filed an application under Section 22(4) of the Act … defendant in OS 27080/2007 challenging the order passed on an interlocutory application under Section 22(4) of the Indian Designs Act, 2000 wherein the trial court has refused to transfer the suit to the High Court.2. For the purpose of

Srmb Udyog Limited Through Its Marketing Manager Sri Sunil Kumar Vs. A ...

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Designs Act, 2000 - Sections 19 and 22; Designs Act, 1911; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : AIR2008Jhar32; 2007(2)BLJR2208; [2007(3)JCR374(Jhr)]

gone into the grounds taken by the defendant No. 1 in its petition under Section 19 of the Designs Act, 2000 (for short 'the Act') filed before the Controller and also the bona fides of defendant No. 1, before

Godrej Sara Lee Limited Vs. Reckitt Benckiser Australia Pty. Ltd. and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Designs Act, 2000 - Sections 2, 19, 19(1), 19(2), 22(2), 22(3) and 22(4); ;Designs Act, 1911 - Sections 51A, 51A(1), 51A(2), 53 and 54; ;Patents Act, 1970; ;Patents Rules, 1972; ;Customs Act, 1962 - Section 130; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Section 20; ;Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : JT2010(2)SC148,LC2010(1)101,2010(1)SCALE714,(2010)2SCC535

dated 28th March, 2008, passed by the Controller of Patents and Designs, Kolkata, under Section 19(1) of the Designs Act, 2000, cancelling two registered designs for 'Insecticide Coil' in Class 12 belonging to the Respondent No. 1 herein. The

Reckitt Benckiser (India) Ltd. Vs. Wyeth Limited

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Designs Act, 2000 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 7, 10, 17, 19, 19(1), 22, 22(1), 22(2), 22(3), 26 and 44; Copyright Act, 1957; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 65; Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988; Registered Designs Act, 1949 - Sections 5 and 5(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 39, Rules 1, 2 and 4; Designs Rules, 2001 - Rules 22 and 27

Reported in : 162(2009)DLT298; 2009(41)PTC24(Del)

in favour of the plaintiff is liable to be cancelled under the provisions of Section 19 of the Designs Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as the 'said Act'). According to the defendant, the plaintiff's said design registration was liable

Rotela Auto Components (P) Ltd. and anr. Vs. Jaspal Singh and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Designs Act, 2000 - Sections 4, 9, 10(4), 19, 22, 22(2), 22(3) and 38; Designs Act, 1911 - Sections 51A and 53; Patents Act - Sections 64 and 107

Reported in : 95(2002)DLT830

that plaintiffs are manufacturing unique and distinctive locks since the period of its registration under the provisions of Designs Act, 2000. Some of the salient features of the plaintiffs Top Open Locks are as under:-a) Top View: (i) It … registration can only be done if the defendants had challenged the same on the ground as mentioned in Section 19 of the Act. It was then contended that in the absence of any application for cancellation not filed

Metco Polymers Pvt. Limited and Vs. Madhu Inflatables Pvt. Limited and

Court : Chennai

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Designs Act, 2000 - Sections 2, 4, 5, 6, 9, 19, 22, 22(2) and 22(3); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 115

Reported in : (2005)4MLJ294

C.S.No.638 of 2003. 2. The said suit was filed by the present appellants under Section 22 of the Designs Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from in any manner infringing upon … Learned Senior Counsel for the appellants has submitted that the learned single Judge has erroneously placed reliance upon Section 19 of the Designs Act at the stage of considering the question of injunction. 8. At this stage, it

Metal Impacts Pvt. Ltd., Represented by Its Representative Senior Sale ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code Of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 7 Rule 1, Order 7 Rule 2; Designs Act 2000 - Sections 22, 19(1), 2, 4; Companies Act, 1956; Designs Act, 1999

Reported in : 2012(2)KCCR853; 2012(3)CTC(IP)15

(Prayer: This plaint filed under order VII Rule 1 and 2 of CPC r/w Section 22 of Designs Act 2000 before the Additional City Civil Judge, Mayohall Unit, Bangalore, registered as Original Suit No.15349 of 2006 and transferred … also contended that the registered design of the plaintiff may be cancelled on the grounds as available under Section 19(1) of the Act, i.e., it has been published in India or in any other country prior to the

Bharat Glass Tube Limited Vs. Gopal Glass Works Limited

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Designs Act, 2000 - Sections 1, 1(3), 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 11(2), 12, 17, 18, 19, 22, 32, 36, 37, 44 and 51; Designs Act, 1911 - Sections 51A; Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 2 and 2(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 479; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2; Registered Designs Act, 1949; Designs Rules, 2001 - Rules 11 and 29

Reported in : AIR2008SC2520; LC2008(2)173; (2008)5MLJ939(SC); 2008(37)PTC1(SC); 2008(8)SCALE4; (2008)10SCC657; 2008AIRSCW3509; 2008AIRSC2520; [2008] 7 SCR 397

respondent against the said design. In order to counter-blast the suit, the appellant herein filed an application under Section 19 of the Act of 2000 before the Controller of Patents & Designs for cancellation of registration of Design … up and colour shades and the same were registered and/or were awaiting registration as industrial designs under the Designs Act, 2000 (hereinafter to be referred to as the Act of 2000) and the Rules framed thereunder. For production of

M/s. Selvel Industries and Another Vs. M/s. Om Plast (India)

Court : Mumbai

Subject : MRTP

in this Notice of Motion for interim relief in an action in infringement and passing off under the Designs Act, 2000, is whether the Defendant s product infringes the Plaintiffs registered design. 4. I must state straight away that, … for relief under sub-section (2), every ground on which the registration of a design may be cancelled under section 19 shall be available as a ground of defence. (4) Notwithstanding anything contained in the second proviso to sub-section

M/s. Maya Appliances Private Limited, Besant Avenue, Adyar, Chennai an ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : MRTP

view that there is no necessity to allow the application filed for appointment of Advocate Commissioner being consequential. Designs Act, 2000 Section 2(d), Section 4, Section 6, Section 19, Section 22 Trade and Merchandise Mark Act, 1958 Indian Penal Code