Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: designs act 2000 preamble 1 · Page 1 of about 512 results (0.078 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 20 2017

j.c. Bamford Excavators Limited & Anr. Vs.bull Machines Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-20-2017

Subject : MRTP

of drawings were functional items and would not qualify for registration of designs under Section 2(b) of the Designs Act, 2000. It was further claimed that the drawings had been specifically developed to increase the efficiency of finished products. … which were industrially produced. e. A perusal of the Copyright Act and the Designs Act and indeed the Preamble and the Statement of Objects and Reasons of the Designs Act makes it clear that the legislative intent … THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:20. 12.2017 + CS(OS) 2934/2011 J.C. BAMFORD EXCAVATORS LIMITED & ANR. .....Plaintiffs Versus BULL

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 27 2010

Hm Treasury Vs. Ahmed and Others

Court : UK Supreme Court

Decided on : Jan-27-2010

Subject : Land Acquisition

Regulation. The Orders in Council: the Terrorism Orders 23. The United Kingdom Parliament had already enacted the Terrorism Act 2000 for the creation of a criminal regime dealing with the funding of terrorism. It received the Royal Assent … to an end. It came into force on 24 October 1945. The Preamble records the determination of the United Nations to save succeeding generations from … LORD HOPE, with whom Lord Walker and Lady Hale agree 1. On 13 December 2006 the appellant Mohammed al-Ghabra, referred to in these … 4 of the Terrorism (United Nations Measures) Order 2006 (SI 2006/2657) ("the TO") and that he was a designated person for the purposes of that Order. He was told that the direction had been made because the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 26 2005

S.B.P. and Co. Vs. Patel Engineering Ltd. and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-26-2005

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 1, 2 to 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 11(1), 11(2), 11(3), 11(4), 11(5), 11(6), 11(7), 11(8), 11(9), 11(10), 12, 12(3), 13, 14, 15, 16, 16(1), 17, 18 to 27, 28 to 33, 34 to 37, 37(2), 44 to 60, 61 to 81 and 82 to 86; Arbitration Act, 1859; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 2 to 43 and 85; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 43; United Provinces (Temporary) Control of Rent and Eviction Act, 1947; Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 - Sections 18; Constitution of India - Articles 32, 136, 226 and 227; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1859; Arbitration Act, 1899; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10 and 10(1); Foreign Awards (Recognition and Enforcement) Act, 1961 - Sections 3, 7 and 35; Foreign

Reported in : AIR2006SC450; 2006(1)ALD10(SC); 2005(3)ARBLR285(SC); 2006(1)AWC538(SC); 2006(1)BomCR585; [2005]128CompCas465(SC); (2006)2CompLJ7(SC); 2005(5)CTC302; (2006)3GLR2097; [2006(1

to the existence of the arbitration clause.' [See also Malaysian Airlines System v. Stic Travels (P) Ltd., : 2000(7)SCALE670 ; Nimeet Resources INC v. Essar Steels Ltd.; (2000) SCC 497; Shin Etsu Chemical Co. Ltd. v. Aksh … relating to conciliation and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. The preamble indicates that since the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) … SLP(C) Nos. 3205/2004, 14033-14034/2004, 21272-273/2002.1. What is the nature of the function of the Chief Justice or his designate under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is the question that is posed before us.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 28 2009

Microfibres Inc. Vs. Girdhar and Co. and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-28-2009

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 6, 11, 13, 13(2), 14, 15, 15(1), 15(2), 16, 22, 40, 63, 67; Copyright Act, 1967 - Sections 15; Designs Act, 2000 - Sections 2, 4, 11(2), 12 and 19(1); Design Act of 1911 - Sections 2(5); Patent and Designs Act; Patent Act; Trade Marks Act; U.K. Designs Act, 1949 - Sections 1(3); Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 2(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 415, 420 and 479; New Design Rules, 2001; Copyright Law

Reported in : LC2009(2)229; 2009(40)PTC519(Del)

that the learned Single Judge held that the designs in question were capable of being registered under the Designs Act, 2000 and consequently the appellant was not entitled to seek protection under the copyright law as the designs had … reflect the legislative intent. 32. A perusal of the Copyright Act and the Designs Act and indeed the Preamble and the Statement of Objects and Reasons of the Designs Act makes it clear that the legislative intent … Mukul Mudgal, J. 1. This appeal bearing RFA (OS) No. 25/2006 arises out of the judgment

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 08 2005

A and Others (Appellants) (Fc) and Others Vs. Secretary of State for t ...

Court : House of Lords

Decided on : Dec-08-2005

Subject : Right to Information

general rule excluding evidence of intercepted communications, now found in section 17(1) of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000, is expressly disapplied by section 18(1)(e) in proceedings before SIAC. SIAC must give written reasons for its decision, … political traditions, ideals, freedom and the rule of law' to which the Preamble refers, were a Contracting State knowingly to surrender a fugitive to another … prohibition has now become one of the most fundamental standards of the international community. Furthermore, this prohibition is designed to produce a deterrent effect, in that it signals to all members of the international community and the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 15 2013

Micolube India Limited Vs. Rakesh Kumar Trading as Saurabh Industries ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-15-2013

Subject : Intellectual Property

suit for infringement of registered design is maintainable against the another registered proprietor of the design under the Designs Act, 2000; (2) Whether there can be availability of remedy of passing off in the absence of express saving or … the reports of parliamentary Committees. Occasional excursions into the debates of Parliament are permitted. Internal aids are the preamble, the scheme and the provisions of the Act. Having discovered the reason for the statute and so having … COURT OF DELHI: NEW DELHI % + Judgment Reserved on : February 19, 2013 Judgment Pronounced on: May 15, 2013 I.A. No.11874/2012 in CS(OS) 1446/2011

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 18 2019

Crocs Inc Usa vs.action Shoes Pvt Ltd & Anr

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-18-2019

Subject : Intellectual Property

571/2017 Page 6 of 45 10. It was further enquired from the counsel for the plaintiff, that the Designs Act 2000, as per its preamble being an Act to consolidate and amend the law relating to protection of designs, … Kapil Wadhwa, Ms. Deepika Pokharia, Ms. Devyani Nath & Ms. Kaveri Jain, Advs. AND CS(COMM) Nos.903/2018, 905/2016, 906/2016, 1415/2016, 569/2017 & 571/2017 Page 1 of 45 CS(COMM) 906/2016 & IA86092016 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC) CROCS INC USA

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 18 2019

Crocs Inc Usa vs.bioworld Merchandising India Limited

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-18-2019

Subject : Intellectual Property

571/2017 Page 6 of 45 10. It was further enquired from the counsel for the plaintiff, that the Designs Act 2000, as per its preamble being an Act to consolidate and amend the law relating to protection of designs, … Kapil Wadhwa, Ms. Deepika Pokharia, Ms. Devyani Nath & Ms. Kaveri Jain, Advs. AND CS(COMM) Nos.903/2018, 905/2016, 906/2016, 1415/2016, 569/2017 & 571/2017 Page 1 of 45 CS(COMM) 906/2016 & IA86092016 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC) CROCS INC USA

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 18 2019

Crocs Inc. Usa vs.aqualite India Limited and Anr

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-18-2019

Subject : Intellectual Property

571/2017 Page 6 of 45 10. It was further enquired from the counsel for the plaintiff, that the Designs Act 2000, as per its preamble being an Act to consolidate and amend the law relating to protection of designs, … Kapil Wadhwa, Ms. Deepika Pokharia, Ms. Devyani Nath & Ms. Kaveri Jain, Advs. AND CS(COMM) Nos.903/2018, 905/2016, 906/2016, 1415/2016, 569/2017 & 571/2017 Page 1 of 45 CS(COMM) 906/2016 & IA86092016 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC) CROCS INC USA

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 18 2019

Crocs Inc Usa vs.relaxo Footwear Ltd

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-18-2019

Subject : Intellectual Property

571/2017 Page 6 of 45 10. It was further enquired from the counsel for the plaintiff, that the Designs Act 2000, as per its preamble being an Act to consolidate and amend the law relating to protection of designs, … Kapil Wadhwa, Ms. Deepika Pokharia, Ms. Devyani Nath & Ms. Kaveri Jain, Advs. AND CS(COMM) Nos.903/2018, 905/2016, 906/2016, 1415/2016, 569/2017 & 571/2017 Page 1 of 45 CS(COMM) 906/2016 & IA86092016 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC) CROCS INC USA

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial