Advanced Search Results
Microforms Inc Vs. Girdhar and Co. and ors.
Delhi
Jan-13-2006
Intellectual Property Rights
Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 13(1), 14, 15, 15(2), 40, 48 and 51; ;Designs Act, 2000 - Sections 2 and 2(5); Designs Act, 1911; ;Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 2 and 2(1); ;Patents Act; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 479; ;Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 15
128(2006)DLT238; 2006(32)PTC157(Del)
that the artistic works are actually designs relating to textile products and come within the scope of the Designs Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as the Designs Act, 2000). The plaintiff has failed to apply for registration of designs … the case of an work of joint authorship, be construed as a reference to the author dies last.25. Chapter XI provides for infringement and Section 51 stipulates when a copyright is infringed and reads as under: 51. … protection of literary or artistic works first signed at Berne on September 9, 1886, was revised at Berlin in 1908, at Rome in 1928, at
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMallcom (India) Limited & Anr vs.rakesh Kumar & Ors
Delhi
Mar-19-2019
Land Acquisition
of the shoes of the plaintiffs are exclusive to the plaintiffs, being an original design registered under the Designs Act, 2000; (xvii) the defendants are manufacturing cheap quality safety shoes employing the plaintiffs trade mark (Label) packed in an … effect from 1st November, 2018 to the Delhi High Court (Original Side) Rules, 2018, particularly to the new Chapter XA inserted therein and Rule 1 titled “Summary Judgment” whereof provides “At the time of Case Management Hearing, … (x) the trade mark „CIGER‟ (LABEL) has been duly registered in Class 9 with effect from 30th September, 2010; (xi) the trade mark is written
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS.B.P. and Co. Vs. Patel Engineering Ltd. and anr.
Supreme Court of India
Oct-26-2005
Arbitration
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 1, 2 to 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 11(1), 11(2), 11(3), 11(4), 11(5), 11(6), 11(7), 11(8), 11(9), 11(10), 12, 12(3), 13, 14, 15, 16, 16(1), 17, 18 to 27, 28 to 33, 34 to 37, 37(2), 44 to 60, 61 to 81 and 82 to 86; Arbitration Act, 1859; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 2 to 43 and 85; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 43; United Provinces (Temporary) Control of Rent and Eviction Act, 1947; Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 - Sections 18; Constitution of India - Articles 32, 136, 226 and 227; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1859; Arbitration Act, 1899; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10 and 10(1); Foreign Awards (Recognition and Enforcement) Act, 1961 - Sections 3, 7 and 35; Foreign
AIR2006SC450; 2006(1)ALD10(SC); 2005(3)ARBLR285(SC); 2006(1)AWC538(SC); 2006(1)BomCR585; [2005]128CompCas465(SC); (2006)2CompLJ7(SC); 2005(5)CTC302; (2006)3GLR2097; [2006(1
to the existence of the arbitration clause.' [See also Malaysian Airlines System v. Stic Travels (P) Ltd., : 2000(7)SCALE670 ; Nimeet Resources INC v. Essar Steels Ltd.; (2000) SCC 497; Shin Etsu Chemical Co. Ltd. v. Aksh … apply to a court for any one of the orders specified therein. Chapter III of Part I deals with composition of arbitral tribunals. Section 10 … the dispute to arbitration, if a party applies for the same. Section 9 deals with the power of the Court to pass interim orders and … SLP(C) Nos. 3205/2004, 14033-14034/2004, 21272-273/2002.1. What is the nature of the function of the Chief Justice or his designate under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is the question that is posed before us.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
M.C.Jayasingh Vs. Mishra Dhatu Nigam Limited
Chennai
Jan-23-2014
Land Acquisition
Side Rules, Section 108 read with Section 50(1) of the Patents Act, 1970 and Section 22(2)(b) of the Designs Act, 2000. ----- For Plaintiff : Mr.M.Sundar For Defendant-1 : Mr.V.Chandrakanthan For Defendants 2&3 : Mr.C.Manishankar For Defendant-4 : Mr.N.L.Rajah … patent.106. Though Section 13(1) refers repeatedly to ".anticipation"., the expression ".anticipation". is not defined in the Act. But, Chapter VI containing Sections 29 to 32 deals with anticipation by previous publication. Here again, there is an element … of polymer components as journal bearings which reduce wear and tear by 90% and give smooth and free articulation of the joints; (2) the use
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMicolube India Limited Vs. Rakesh Kumar Trading as Saurabh Industries ...
Delhi
May-15-2013
Intellectual Property
suit for infringement of registered design is maintainable against the another registered proprietor of the design under the Designs Act, 2000; (2) Whether there can be availability of remedy of passing off in the absence of express saving or … intents the like effect as against the Government as it has against any person and the provisions of Chapter XVII of the Patents Act, 1970 shall apply to registered designs as they apply to patents. Section 22 … Advocate (Amicus Curiae) CS(OS) No.1446/2011 & CS(OS) No. 384/2008 Page No.1 of 94 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPawan Deep Singh Bahl Vs. Princep Supply Agency
Delhi
Dec-06-2013
Intellectual Property
of any of the acts complained by the plaintiff. And that in accordance with Sec. 20 of the Designs Act, 2000 read with Sec. 47 and Chapter XVII of the Patents Act, 1970, a patent/design is granted subject to … that it was only when the Local Commissioner, appointed by this Court, visited the defendant‟s office on September 9, 2002, that it came to know that the said design was registered in favour of the plaintiff.12. The
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskOil And Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. Vs. Afcons Gunanusa Jv
Supreme Court of India
Aug-30-2022
Land Acquisition
Annette Magnusson, Jakob Ragnwaldh and Martin Wallin (eds), International Arbitration in Sweden: A Practitioner's Guide (2nd edition, 2021), Chapter 9 83 The Swedish Arbitration Act (SFS1999116), available at accessed on 29 June 2022 84 Supra at note 82 … each state to adopt a uniform arbitration law. It was revised in 2000. Section 21(d) of the revised version of the Act provides that ―an … take into account the schedule of fees that has been issued or provided by an appointing authority, if designated by the parties32. In the absence of such a fee schedule, the arbitral tribunal could fix its fees
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMidas Hygiene Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Sudhir Bhatia
Delhi
Nov-04-2015
Intellectual Property
******* ******** ********* 15. Special provision regarding copyright in designs registered or capable of being registered under the Designs Act, 2000 (16 of 2000) - (1) Copyright shall not subsist under this Act in any design which is registered … and industrially produced and therefore fall within class 19 of the third schedule. The said Class contains the Chapter heading Stationery and Office equipments, artists and teaching material ?. Class 19-01 includes all paper in the widest … of the Copyright Act, 1957 has no application to this case. ? 9. Highlighting that Microfibres is binding precedent in the context of findings as
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/s. Maya Appliances Private Limited, Besant Avenue, Adyar, Chennai an ...
Chennai
Jan-09-2017
MRTP
the provisions and the principles of law. Apropos the provisions, they are placed hereunder for easy understanding: THE DESIGNS ACT, 2000: 3.1. Section 2(d): design means only the features of shape, configuration, pattern, ornament or composition of lines or … ordinary pays his heart for what his eyes eat only 4.5. 2000 years ago, Saint Thiruvalluvar in the Chapter coming under love felt that the eyes of a maiden has the capacity to drink the life out … KEMP AND COMPANY AND OTHERS V. PRIMA PLASTICS LIMITED (2000 (2) PTC 96), is quoted with profit: It is true that the first plaintiff has
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askiag Company Ltd. Vs. Triveni Glass Ltd.
Kolkata
May-18-2004
Intellectual Property Rights
Designs Act, 1911 - Section 51A and 53; ;Designs Act, 2000 - Sections 2, 4, 19(1), 22, 22(2)(3), 22(3), 48, 48(2) and 48(4)
2004(3)CHN447,2005(30)PTC140(Cal)
21 (this must be typographical error, as the grounds of defence are contained in Section 22) of the Designs Act, 2000. This Court is in respectful agreement with the said ratio in Faber Castell.38. Two other judgments on which … of certain designs. Section 4 of the new Act is also a new provision. Apart from that, in Chapter V of the new Act, which deals with legal proceeding, there is a substantial difference from the corresponding … be the subject to the provisions of the new Act. (see para 9 of the judgment).36. The learned Judge considered various notes on clauses on
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »