Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: designs act 2000 chapter 5 · Page 1 of about 1,939 results (0.108 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 13 2006

Microforms Inc Vs. Girdhar and Co. and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-13-2006

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 13(1), 14, 15, 15(2), 40, 48 and 51; ;Designs Act, 2000 - Sections 2 and 2(5); Designs Act, 1911; ;Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 2 and 2(1); ;Patents Act; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 479; ;Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 15

Reported in : 128(2006)DLT238; 2006(32)PTC157(Del)

that the artistic works are actually designs relating to textile products and come within the scope of the Designs Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as the Designs Act, 2000). The plaintiff has failed to apply for registration of designs … the case of an work of joint authorship, be construed as a reference to the author dies last.25. Chapter XI provides for infringement and Section 51 stipulates when a copyright is infringed and reads as under: 51. … Au-356-331 21.11.199538. PRESTIGE V Au-406-109 17.12.199742. TARSUS V Au-458-207 12.11.199946. BLACK POOL* 56. REGIA* V Au-498-306 06.12.20004. It may be noticed that in the said

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 09 2017

M/s. Maya Appliances Private Limited, Besant Avenue, Adyar, Chennai an ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-09-2017

Subject : MRTP

the provisions and the principles of law. Apropos the provisions, they are placed hereunder for easy understanding: THE DESIGNS ACT, 2000: 3.1. Section 2(d): design means only the features of shape, configuration, pattern, ornament or composition of lines or … ordinary pays his heart for what his eyes eat only 4.5. 2000 years ago, Saint Thiruvalluvar in the Chapter coming under love felt that the eyes of a maiden has the capacity to drink the life out

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 13 2005

Metco Polymers Pvt. Limited and Vs. Madhu Inflatables Pvt. Limited and

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-13-2005

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Designs Act, 2000 - Sections 2, 4, 5, 6, 9, 19, 22, 22(2) and 22(3); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 115

Reported in : (2005)4MLJ294

injunction. 8. At this stage, it may be necessary to notice to the relevant provisions contained in the Designs Act, 2000. Chapter II of the Act relates to Registration of Designs. It states inter alia that a design, which is … use or in any other way prior to the filing date for registration, shall not be registered. Section 5 provides for filing of application for registration of designs and Section 6 envisages registration to be in respect

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 19 2019

Mallcom (India) Limited & Anr vs.rakesh Kumar & Ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-19-2019

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the shoes of the plaintiffs are exclusive to the plaintiffs, being an original design registered under the Designs Act, 2000; (xvii) the defendants are manufacturing cheap quality safety shoes employing the plaintiffs trade mark (Label) packed in an … effect from 1st November, 2018 to the Delhi High Court (Original Side) Rules, 2018, particularly to the new Chapter XA inserted therein and Rule 1 titled “Summary Judgment” whereof provides “At the time of Case Management Hearing, … style of defendant no.3 M.K. Sales Corporation and the defendants no.4 and 5 viz. Adeeba International and Alina Exim, from infringing the said trade mark

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 28 2018

Rajesh Kalra vs.safeops. Surgical Care & Anr

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-28-2018

Subject : Land Acquisition

also asked the counsel for the plaintiff as to how the aforesaid qualifies as a „design‟ under the Designs Act, 2000, for a suit to be entertained.13. The definition of „design‟ in Section 2(d) of the Designs Act means … has brought copy of Bharat Glass Tube Ltd. Vs. Gopal Glass Works Ltd. (2008) 10 SCC657and copy of Chapter 27 (pages no.390 to398) of Narayanan‟s textbook „Copyright in Industrial Designs‟ but is unable to point out the … OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:28. h May, 2018 CS(COMM) 55/2018 & IAs No.1193/2018 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC) & 1194/2018 (u/O XXVI R-9

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 26 2005

S.B.P. and Co. Vs. Patel Engineering Ltd. and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-26-2005

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 1, 2 to 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 11(1), 11(2), 11(3), 11(4), 11(5), 11(6), 11(7), 11(8), 11(9), 11(10), 12, 12(3), 13, 14, 15, 16, 16(1), 17, 18 to 27, 28 to 33, 34 to 37, 37(2), 44 to 60, 61 to 81 and 82 to 86; Arbitration Act, 1859; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 2 to 43 and 85; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 43; United Provinces (Temporary) Control of Rent and Eviction Act, 1947; Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 - Sections 18; Constitution of India - Articles 32, 136, 226 and 227; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1859; Arbitration Act, 1899; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10 and 10(1); Foreign Awards (Recognition and Enforcement) Act, 1961 - Sections 3, 7 and 35; Foreign

Reported in : AIR2006SC450; 2006(1)ALD10(SC); 2005(3)ARBLR285(SC); 2006(1)AWC538(SC); 2006(1)BomCR585; [2005]128CompCas465(SC); (2006)2CompLJ7(SC); 2005(5)CTC302; (2006)3GLR2097; [2006(1

to the existence of the arbitration clause.' [See also Malaysian Airlines System v. Stic Travels (P) Ltd., : 2000(7)SCALE670 ; Nimeet Resources INC v. Essar Steels Ltd.; (2000) SCC 497; Shin Etsu Chemical Co. Ltd. v. Aksh … apply to a court for any one of the orders specified therein. Chapter III of Part I deals with composition of arbitral tribunals. Section 10 … stating his objections referred to in the section, without undue delay. Section 5 indicates the extent of judicial intervention. It says that notwithstanding anything contained … SLP(C) Nos. 3205/2004, 14033-14034/2004, 21272-273/2002.1. What is the nature of the function of the Chief Justice or his designate under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is the question that is posed before us.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 23 2014

M.C.Jayasingh Vs. Mishra Dhatu Nigam Limited

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-23-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

Side Rules, Section 108 read with Section 50(1) of the Patents Act, 1970 and Section 22(2)(b) of the Designs Act, 2000. ----- For Plaintiff : Mr.M.Sundar For Defendant-1 : Mr.V.Chandrakanthan For Defendants 2&3 : Mr.C.Manishankar For Defendant-4 : Mr.N.L.Rajah … patent.106. Though Section 13(1) refers repeatedly to ".anticipation"., the expression ".anticipation". is not defined in the Act. But, Chapter VI containing Sections 29 to 32 deals with anticipation by previous publication. Here again, there is an element … 1. Mishra Dhatu Nigam Limited (MIDHANI) rep.by its Managing Director, Kanchanbagh Hyderabad 500 058.2. Apollo Hospitals, Jubilee Hills Road Banjara Hills, Hyderabad 500 033.3. Apollo

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 18 2019

Crocs Inc Usa vs.action Shoes Pvt Ltd & Anr

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-18-2019

Subject : Intellectual Property

571/2017 Page 6 of 45 10. It was further enquired from the counsel for the plaintiff, that the Designs Act 2000, as per its preamble being an Act to consolidate and amend the law relating to protection of designs, … relating to trade marks defined ‗trade mark‘ as under: ―2(1)(v) ―trade mark‖ means- (i) (ii) in relation to Chapter X (other than section 81), a registered trade mark or a mark used in relation to goods for … Nath & Ms. Kaveri Jain, Advs. AND CS(COMM) Nos.903/2018, 905/2016, 906/2016, 1415/2016, 569/2017 & 571/2017 Page 1 of 45 CS(COMM) 906/2016 & IA86092016 (u/O XXXIX

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 18 2019

Crocs Inc Usa vs.bioworld Merchandising India Limited

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-18-2019

Subject : Intellectual Property

571/2017 Page 6 of 45 10. It was further enquired from the counsel for the plaintiff, that the Designs Act 2000, as per its preamble being an Act to consolidate and amend the law relating to protection of designs, … relating to trade marks defined ‗trade mark‘ as under: ―2(1)(v) ―trade mark‖ means- (i) (ii) in relation to Chapter X (other than section 81), a registered trade mark or a mark used in relation to goods for … Nath & Ms. Kaveri Jain, Advs. AND CS(COMM) Nos.903/2018, 905/2016, 906/2016, 1415/2016, 569/2017 & 571/2017 Page 1 of 45 CS(COMM) 906/2016 & IA86092016 (u/O XXXIX

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 18 2019

Crocs Inc. Usa vs.aqualite India Limited and Anr

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-18-2019

Subject : Intellectual Property

571/2017 Page 6 of 45 10. It was further enquired from the counsel for the plaintiff, that the Designs Act 2000, as per its preamble being an Act to consolidate and amend the law relating to protection of designs, … relating to trade marks defined ‗trade mark‘ as under: ―2(1)(v) ―trade mark‖ means- (i) (ii) in relation to Chapter X (other than section 81), a registered trade mark or a mark used in relation to goods for … Nath & Ms. Kaveri Jain, Advs. AND CS(COMM) Nos.903/2018, 905/2016, 906/2016, 1415/2016, 569/2017 & 571/2017 Page 1 of 45 CS(COMM) 906/2016 & IA86092016 (u/O XXXIX

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial