Advanced Search Results

Microforms Inc Vs. Girdhar and Co. and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 13(1), 14, 15, 15(2), 40, 48 and 51; ;Designs Act, 2000 - Sections 2 and 2(5); Designs Act, 1911; ;Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 2 and 2(1); ;Patents Act; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 479; ;Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 15

Reported in : 128(2006)DLT238; 2006(32)PTC157(Del)

that the artistic works are actually designs relating to textile products and come within the scope of the Designs Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as the Designs Act, 2000). The plaintiff has failed to apply for registration of designs … the case of an work of joint authorship, be construed as a reference to the author dies last.25. Chapter XI provides for infringement and Section 51 stipulates when a copyright is infringed and reads as under: 51. … 20.06.199621. JUNE V Au-432-374 19.05.199823. LEIPZIG V Au-380-615 24.01.199731. MEISSEN V Au 391-653 20.05.199733. PALMETTO V Au-356-331 21.11.199538. PRESTIGE V Au-406-109 17.12.199742. TARSUS V Au-458-207

Microfibres Inc. Vs. Girdhar and Co. and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 6, 11, 13, 13(2), 14, 15, 15(1), 15(2), 16, 22, 40, 63, 67; Copyright Act, 1967 - Sections 15; Designs Act, 2000 - Sections 2, 4, 11(2), 12 and 19(1); Design Act of 1911 - Sections 2(5); Patent and Designs Act; Patent Act; Trade Marks Act; U.K. Designs Act, 1949 - Sections 1(3); Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 2(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 415, 420 and 479; New Design Rules, 2001; Copyright Law

Reported in : LC2009(2)229; 2009(40)PTC519(Del)

that the learned Single Judge held that the designs in question were capable of being registered under the Designs Act, 2000 and consequently the appellant was not entitled to seek protection under the copyright law as the designs had … other by the Copyright Act. The artistic work governed by the Designs Act consequently receives copyright cover under Chapter III of the Designs Act and the residuary categories of artistic works receive protection under the Copyright Act. … in this appeal and the other two appeals i.e. FAO (OS) No. 326/2007 filed by Dart Industries Inc. and FAO (OS) No. 447/2008 filed by

M/s. Maya Appliances Private Limited, Besant Avenue, Adyar, Chennai an ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : MRTP

the provisions and the principles of law. Apropos the provisions, they are placed hereunder for easy understanding: THE DESIGNS ACT, 2000: 3.1. Section 2(d): design means only the features of shape, configuration, pattern, ornament or composition of lines or … ordinary pays his heart for what his eyes eat only 4.5. 2000 years ago, Saint Thiruvalluvar in the Chapter coming under love felt that the eyes of a maiden has the capacity to drink the life out

Micolube India Limited Vs. Rakesh Kumar Trading as Saurabh Industries ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property

suit for infringement of registered design is maintainable against the another registered proprietor of the design under the Designs Act, 2000; (2) Whether there can be availability of remedy of passing off in the absence of express saving or … intents the like effect as against the Government as it has against any person and the provisions of Chapter XVII of the Patents Act, 1970 shall apply to registered designs as they apply to patents. Section 22 … Jaspreet Sareen & Mr. Angad Varma, Advs. for the Interveners. AND CS(OS) 384/2008 & I.A. No.9537/2011, I.A. No.13404/2012 MOHAN LAL Through : ..... Plaintiff Mr.

Pranda Jewelry Pvt. Ltd. and Others Vs. Aarya 24 kt and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

9. The Designs Act, 2000, contains provisions for registration of design and provides for copyright in registered designs. Chapter 3 contains provisions concerning copyright in registered design. Section 11 of the chapter is in the following terms: “11.Copyright … (c) The artistic works referred to by the Plaintiffs are really designs, capable of being registered under the Designs Act, 2000, though not so registered and hence, under Section 15 of the Copyright Act, 1957, the copyright in the

Midas Hygiene Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Sudhir Bhatia

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property

******* ******** ********* 15. Special provision regarding copyright in designs registered or capable of being registered under the Designs Act, 2000 (16 of 2000) - (1) Copyright shall not subsist under this Act in any design which is registered … and industrially produced and therefore fall within class 19 of the third schedule. The said Class contains the Chapter heading Stationery and Office equipments, artists and teaching material ?. Class 19-01 includes all paper in the widest … of the products was registered under No. A-51334/91 of the Copyright Act. 3. The respondent was employed by the appellants from 1985 as he was

Metco Polymers Pvt. Limited and Vs. Madhu Inflatables Pvt. Limited and

Court : Chennai

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Designs Act, 2000 - Sections 2, 4, 5, 6, 9, 19, 22, 22(2) and 22(3); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 115

Reported in : (2005)4MLJ294

injunction. 8. At this stage, it may be necessary to notice to the relevant provisions contained in the Designs Act, 2000. Chapter II of the Act relates to Registration of Designs. It states inter alia that a design, which is … Water Beds and Squared Water Seats/Water Cushion and, consequently directing the defendants to pay damages to the plaintiffs. 3. During pendency of the suit, the appellants also filed an application for interim injunction restraining the defendants /

Mallcom (India) Limited & Anr vs.rakesh Kumar & Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the shoes of the plaintiffs are exclusive to the plaintiffs, being an original design registered under the Designs Act, 2000; (xvii) the defendants are manufacturing cheap quality safety shoes employing the plaintiffs trade mark (Label) packed in an … effect from 1st November, 2018 to the Delhi High Court (Original Side) Rules, 2018, particularly to the new Chapter XA inserted therein and Rule 1 titled “Summary Judgment” whereof provides “At the time of Case Management Hearing, … under the mark and for ancillary reliefs. CS(COMM) No.480/2016 Page 1 of 31 2. The suit came up first before this Court on 5th May,

Ashok Kumar Pandey Son of Shyam Krishna Pandey and ors. Vs. State of U ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act 1947 - Sections 15, 25, 25A, 25(1), 25(2), 25(12) and 125; Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Regulations; Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Rules; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16 and 243G; Constitution of India (73rd Amendment) Act

Reported in : 2005(4)AWC3674

for the respondents on the judgment of the Division Bench reported in 2000 (2) L.B.E.S.R. 128, Allahabad Manbodh Kumar Lal and Ors. v. State of … S.C. Page 574, Kunal Nanda v. Union of India. The fundamental Rules Chapter III Rules 12 and 13 clearly deals with termination or suspension of … 8 government departments including the employees like, the petitioners (Regular Tube Well Operators) and all such employees were designated as multi purpose Panchayat workers. A copy of the said Government Order has been filed as Annexure-1 to … sought to be achieved through the 73rd Amendment in the Constitution as provided under Article 243-G and Amended Act i.e. U.P. Act No. 27 of 1999 was enacted by which new sections i.e. Section 25 and Section … is hereby dismissed. No order as to costs. 3.8,2005 - LAND ACQUISITION ACT, 1894 [C.A. No. 1/1894].

Rajesh Kalra vs.safeops. Surgical Care & Anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

also asked the counsel for the plaintiff as to how the aforesaid qualifies as a „design‟ under the Designs Act, 2000, for a suit to be entertained.13. The definition of „design‟ in Section 2(d) of the Designs Act means … has brought copy of Bharat Glass Tube Ltd. Vs. Gopal Glass Works Ltd. (2008) 10 SCC657and copy of Chapter 27 (pages no.390 to398) of Narayanan‟s textbook „Copyright in Industrial Designs‟ but is unable to point out the … is selling its goods to defendant No.2 at Delhi. CS(COMM) 55/2018 Page 3 of 17 2. The suit came up before this Court for admission