Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: designs act 1911 section 78 · Page 1 of about 197 results (0.046 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 28 1999

Danieli a C Officine Maccaniche Spa Vs. Controller of Patents and Desi ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jun-28-1999

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Patents Act, 1970 - Sections 15, 15(1), 21-A, 25(1), 116, 116(2), 133 to 139, 133(1), 162 and 162(3 and 4);; Patent and Designs Act, 1911 - Sections 78(A and A(4)) and 134;; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Section 6

Reported in : (2000)1CALLT7(HC)

The benefit of reciprocity was Introduced In India as far as patents were concerned by the Patent and Designs Act, 1911 (referred to as (he 1911 Act). The 1911 Act was repealed by the present Act of 1970.8. The … purpose of this Act.'9. The corresponding provision to section 133 was section 78A(4) of the 1911 Act. Section 78A(4) empowered the Central Government to direct … his order dated 18th February, 1999 for determination of the larger Bench--(a) whether the appeal was maintainable under section 116 of the Patents Act, 1970 (referred to as the Act); and (b) whether the order of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 20 1979

J.N. Electricals (India) Vs. President Electricals

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-20-1979

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Design Act, 1911 - Sections 2(5)

Reported in : ILR1980Delhi215

configuration, upper view and side view of the plaintiffs' toaster are new and original and protected under the Designs Act, 1911 (hereinafter called 'the Act').(5) It is further averred in the plaint that the arrangement of the outer sheet … defendants never applied for cancellation of the registered design of the plaintiffs, in respect of the electric toaster, Section 2(5) of the Designs Act, 1911 defines 'design' which is as under : 'DESIGN'means only the features of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 04 1977

imperial Chemical Industries Ltd. Vs. Controller General of Patents, D ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jul-04-1977

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Patents Act, 1970 - Sections 2, 67, 71, 87 and 88; ;Patents and Desings Act, 1911

Reported in : AIR1978Cal77

the expiration of three years from the date of sealing of the patent under the Indian Patents and Designs Act, 1911, whichever is later; and(b) every patent granted after the commencement of this Act in respect of any such … urged that the same was in violation of the provisions of Sections 78 and 88 of the Act of 1970 and in so doing the … Sabyasachi Mukharji, J.1. This is an appeal under Section 16 of the Patents Act, 1970. This appeal is out of an order passed on 7th Jan. 1977

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 23 1987

Scooters India Ltd. Vs. Java Hind Industries Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-23-1987

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Patents Act, 1970 - Sections 25; Patent Rules, 1972 - Rule 35

Reported in : AIR1988Delhi82; 1988(1)ARBLR255(Delhi); 33(1987)DLT298

Bhushan in support of the petition and Mr. N.K. Anand in opposition thereto. (4) The Indian Patents and Designs Act, 1911 contained provisions both relating to Patents as well as to Designs. With the enactment of the Patents Act, … 28, section 51, section 54, section 57, section 60, section 61, section 63, sub-section (3) of section 69, section 78, section 84, section 86, section 88(3), section 89, section 93, section 96 and section 97. (3) Every appeal

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 28 1969

New Delhi Municipal Committee Vs. the Punjab National Bank Limited

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-28-1969

Subject : Municipal Tax

Acts : Punjab Municipal Act, 1911 - Sections 61

Reported in : ILR1986Delhi292

in that year can be added to the list by amendment under Section 67 of the Punjab Municipal Act, 1911 in the year for which house-tax is payable. The question involves the interpretation of Sections 61 to 68 … Bombay High Court in. The decision turns on the interpretation of Sections 78 and 82 of the Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act 18 of 1925 which … particulars :- (A)the name of the street oi division in which the property is situated ; . (B)the designation of the property, either by name or by number sufficient for identification ; (C)the names of the owner

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 27 2011

Lucasfilm Limited and Others (Appellants) Vs. Ainsworth and Another (R ...

Court : UK Supreme Court

Decided on : Jul-27-2011

Subject : Intellectual Property

of protection was much shorter. Those were the essential features of the scheme introduced by the Copyright of Designs Act 1839, repealed and replaced by the Designs Act 1842. Earlier legislation granting copyright to the design of a … difficult to understand without reference to their legislative history. Unfortunately the history is itself quite complicated. The Copyright Act 1911 ("the 1911 Act") was (as Lord Bridge observed in British Leyland [1986] AC 577, 619) "the first attempt … defences (to a claim that he was reproducing Mr McQuarrie's work) under sections 51 and 52 of the Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 ("the … meaning of the words of the statute (see Lord Reid at p 78, Lord Morris at p 81, Viscount Dilhorne at pp 86-87, Lord Simon

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 27 1994

William Grant and Sons Ltd. Vs. Mcdowell and Compay Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-27-1994

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : The Scotch Whisky Act, 1988; Scotch Whisky Order 1990; Indian Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 5, 19(2) and 92; Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 2, 2(2), 15 and 20; Designs Act, 1911 - Sections 2(5); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 479; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 23, Rule 3

Reported in : 1994IIIAD(Delhi)65; 55(1994)DLT80; 1994(30)DRJ105

be treated as a 'design'. The label cannot be a design also for the reason that in the Designs Act, 1911, section 2(5) defines 'design' as follows: . 'design' means only the features of shape, configuration, pattern or ornament applied

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 09 1980

United States. R. Retirement Bd. Vs. Fritz

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Dec-09-1980

Subject : Land Acquisition

Natural Carbonic Gas Co., 220 U. S. 61 , 220 U. S. 78 -79 (1911), the Court said that, "[w]hen the classification in such a … patently arbitrary means for determining which employees are "career railroaders," the class for whom the 1974 Act was designed. Pp. 449 U. S. 176 -178. (c) Nor is there merit to the District Court's conclusion that Congress … opinion of the Court. The United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana held unconstitutional a section of the Railroad Retirement Act of 1974, 88 Stat. 1305, as amended, 45 U.S.C. § 231 et seq.,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 14 1917

Mani Lall Sing Vs. the Trustees for the Improvement of Calcutta

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Aug-14-1917

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 44Ind.Cas.770

view, and in pursuance of a resolution in terms of Section 39, Clause (c), of the Calcutta Improvement Act, 1911, the Trustees have framed their Scheme No. VIIA in the manner contemplated in Sections 39 to 42 of … land under Section 81 or by abandoning the land in consideration of the payment of a sum under Section 78, was rightly decided.2. The suit out of which the present reference arises was instituted on the Original Side … 81 in the manner already touched upon, according to which they were designed to enable the Board to make a profit out of the abandoned

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 13 2023

Assocn. Of Vasanth Appts. Owners Vs. V. Gopinanth And Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-13-2023

Subject : Land Acquisition

roads shall be reserved and this space shall be transferred to the authority or to the local body designated by it, free of cost, through a deed. It is obligatory to reserve the 10 percent of the … in AIR1994Supreme Court 2550 [relevant para- 9]. has held that the statutory provisions U/S1921)(c) of the Punjab Municipal Act'1911 and U/S2031)(c) of Haryana Municipal Act'1973 enabling the State to seek transfer of land to the extent of … IS THE IMPUGNED RULE/ REGULATION ULTRA VIRES?. ............................ 91 THE IMPACT OF SECTIONS36AND37...................................................... 95 IS THE IMPUGNED RULE/REGULATION BAD FOR THE REASON THAT IT IS … allowed by the High Court. SUBMISSIONS OF APPELLANTS/PETITIONER15 In Civil Appeal Nos. 7847 of 2013, Shri Gopal Sankaranarayanan would contend that a compelled gift attracted

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial