Advanced Search Results

Microforms Inc Vs. Girdhar and Co. and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 13(1), 14, 15, 15(2), 40, 48 and 51; ;Designs Act, 2000 - Sections 2 and 2(5); Designs Act, 1911; ;Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 2 and 2(1); ;Patents Act; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 479; ;Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 15

Reported in : 128(2006)DLT238; 2006(32)PTC157(Del)

registration of designs in India under the provisions of the said Act or the predecessor Act being the Designs Act, 1911 (hereinafter referred to as the Designs Act, 1911) The plaintiff having failed to complete the requisite formalities under … Macmillan and Company Limited v. K. and J. Cooper A.I.R. 1924 PC 75. In the said judgment, the observations of Lord Halsbury in the case … The plaintiff has claimed that the artistic work constitutes original artistic work as defined within the meaning of Section 2(c) of the Copyright Act. The plaintiff also claims that it enjoys copyright protection in India as a

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ) Vs. Competition Commission of I ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

CCI and it has a pivotal role under the Competition Act. Patents Act 119. The Indian Patents and Designs Act, 1911 was enacted for the grant of patents and for protection of inventors. After independence, a need was felt … to as the 'impugned order' or 'impugned orders') passed by the Competition Commission of India (hereafter 'CCI') under Section 26(1) of the Competition Act, 2002 (hereafter referred to as 'the Competition Act'). The impugned order dated 12th … Gujarat Urja Vikash Nigam Ltd v. Essar Power Ltd: (2008) 4 SCC 755 in support of its contention that both, the Competition Act as well

Urooj Ahmed Vs. Preethi Kitchen Appliances Private Limited

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

has been incorporated into Section 15 of the Copy Right Act, 1957, with effect from 21.06.2012 by replacing ".Designs Act, 1911"., the embargo provided therein would continue to apply. In other words, it is submitted that in the absence

N.V. Philips Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax (No. 1)

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 9(1), 256(1) and 263; ;Finance Act, 1976; ;Patents Act, 1970; ;Indian Patents and Designs Act, 1911; ;Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964 - Schedule - Rule 1

Reported in : (1987)65CTR(Cal)103,[1988]172ITR521(Cal)

considered the definition of the word 'patent' in the Patents Act, 1970, and the Indian Pa tents and Designs Act, 1911, and also the provisions therein for the grant and user of patents and held that a patent was … the assessee as the same were technical assistance fees. The Commissioner subsequently set aside the said assessment under Section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ('the Act'), as he was of the opinion that the payments received

Aphali Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Companies Act; Medicinal and Toilet Preparations (Excise Duties) Act, 1955 - Sections 2, 3 and 19(2); Medicinal and Toilet Preparations (Excise Duties) (Amendment) Act, 1961; Drugs Act, 1940 - Sections 3; Finance Act (No. 2), 1962 - Sections 18; Seventh Schedule to the Government of India Act, 1935; Drugs (Amendment) Act, 1955; Drugs and Cosmetics (Amendment) Act, 1964 - Sections 33A; Drugs Control Act, 1950; Patent Act, 1970; Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 81; Drugs (Amendment) Act, 1961; Finance Act, 1964; Drugs Rules; Medicinal and Toilet Preparations (Excise Duties) Rules, 1956 - Rule 8, 64, 65 and 66; Drugs Control Ordinance, 1949; Indian Patents and Designs Act, 1911

Reported in : AIR1989SC2227

respect of which a patent is in force. 'Patent' means a patent granted under the Indian Patents and Designs Act, 1911, and now the Patent Act, 1970. A patent medicine will, therefore, mean medicine in respect of which a … 2(i) was re-numbered as item 3(i) of the Schedule as amended by the Amendment Act of 1961.5. By Section 18 of the Finance Act, 1962, the Act was further amended by substitution of an Explanation No. 1

Glaverbel S.A. Vs. Dave Rose and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : CivilIntellectual Property Rights

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 39, Rule 1 and 2; Patents Act, 1970 - Sections 2(1), 8, 12, 13, 13(4), 57, 58, 64, 104A and 107; Patents and Designs Act, 1911 - Sections 26; Patents Act, 2005 - Sections 2(1)

Reported in : 167(2010)DLT6

he patent ought not to have been granted under the provisions of Section 26 of the Patents and Designs Act, 1911, the court will not interfere by issuing a temporary injunction.The argument as regards non-grant of interim injunction in

The Proctor and Gamble Company Represented by Power of Attorney Holder ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Reported in : (1989)1MLJ36

the plaintiffs products were manufactured by industrial process and the design was capable of being registered under the Designs Act, 1911. The defendants proceeded to state that the plaintiff had no reputation or goodwill in India, and therefore, there … readily imagine a case in which the plaintiff appears to have a 75 per cent chance of establishing his claim, but in which the damage … the alleged copyright of the plaintiff in their design has ceased to exist long back by virtue of Section 15 of the Copyright Act, 1957, as the plaintiffs products were manufactured by industrial process and the design

Heemanshu Traders Vs. Delhi Electricals

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 149; Court fees Act, 1870 - Sections 28

Reported in : ILR1975Delhi653; 1976RLR225

a patent action transferred to the High Court under proviso to Section 29 of the Indian Patents and Designs Act, 1911. The judgment was announced on July 22, 1974. After taking into account the time spent in obtaining certified

Assocn. Of Vasanth Appts. Owners Vs. V. Gopinanth And Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

in the alternative he shall pay the market value of equivalent land 75 excluding the first 3000 square meters as per the valuation of the … roads shall be reserved and this space shall be transferred to the authority or to the local body designated by it, free of cost, through a deed. It is obligatory to reserve the 10 percent of the … in AIR1994Supreme Court 2550 [relevant para- 9]. has held that the statutory provisions U/S1921)(c) of the Punjab Municipal Act'1911 and U/S2031)(c) of Haryana Municipal Act'1973 enabling the State to seek transfer of land to the extent of … IS THE IMPUGNED RULE/ REGULATION ULTRA VIRES?. ............................ 91 THE IMPACT OF SECTIONS36AND37...................................................... 95 IS THE IMPUGNED RULE/REGULATION BAD FOR THE REASON THAT IT IS

Novartis AG represented by It's Power of Attorney Ranjna Mehta Dutt Vs ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1), 20(3), 31(1), 32 and 226; Patents Act, 1970 - Sections 3, 5(7A) and 8; Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005 - Sections 3; Employment Protection (Consolidation) Act, 1978; Specific Relief Act - Sections 42

Reported in : (2007)4MLJ1153

Patents Act, 1970 as amended by Act 15/2005. In India there was an Act called Indians Patent & Designs Act enacted in the year 1911. The statement of objects and reasons of the Patents Act, 1970 (Act 39/1970) … same. The prayer in both the writ petitions is one and the same namely, for a declaration that Section 3(d) of the Patents Act, 1970, amended by Patents (Amendment) Act 15/2005, is unconstitutional. However, in the first … under EEC Law namely, Article 119 of EEC Treaty and Council Directives 75/117 (the Equal Pay Directive) and 76/207 (the Equal Treatment Directive). The Secretary