Advanced Search Results

Telemecanique and Controls (i) Limited Vs. Schneider Electric Industri ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; Patents Act, 1970 - Sections 64, 68, 83, 90 and 107; Patents Rules, 1972 - Rules 73 and 74; Designs Act, 1911 - Sections 2(5); Designs (Amendment) Act, 2000 - Sections 2; Indian Law

Reported in : 94(2001)DLT865

visible and not having any aesthetic consideration. Reference was made in this behalf to Section 2(5) of the Designs Act, 1911 to contend that a design to defined not to include any mode or principle of construction or anything … the deed of assignment dated 28.3.94 in terms of Section 68 of the Patents Act, 1970 and Rule 73 of the Patent Rules, 1972 framed there under. The scope of this controversy was further extended by the

Dart Industries Inc. and anr. Vs. Techno Plast and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Designs Act, 2000 - Sections 2, 4, 11, 18, 19, 20, 22, 22(2)(3), 22(3) and 29; Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 13, 14, 15, 17, 45, 51, 53 and 55; Designs Rules, 2001; Designs Act, 1911; Patent Act; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : 2007(35)PTC285(Del)

provides as under:1. Copyright shall not subsist under this Act in any design which is registered under the Designs Act, 1911(2 of 1911).2. Copyright in any design, which is capable of being registered under the Designs Act, 1911 (2 … are two plaintiffs in this case who have filed this suit for permanent injunction against the defendants under Section 22 of the Designs Act, 2000 read with Section 55 of the Copyright Act, 1957. The plaintiff No. … 22, 23, 17, 33, 12, 34MODULAR MATE Pg 123 24, 25, 64, 73ROUND 81, 97, 98, 956. CONTAINER- 172740/Dt-29-11-1996 30, 31, 32 -- 4MODULAR MATE

Scooters India Ltd. Vs. Java Hind Industries Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Patents Act, 1970 - Sections 25; Patent Rules, 1972 - Rule 35

Reported in : AIR1988Delhi82; 1988(1)ARBLR255(Delhi); 33(1987)DLT298

Bhushan in support of the petition and Mr. N.K. Anand in opposition thereto. (4) The Indian Patents and Designs Act, 1911 contained provisions both relating to Patents as well as to Designs. With the enactment of the Patents Act, … the Act defines 'Controller' to mean the Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks referred to in Section 73 of the Act. Under Section 2(l)(i) the 'High Court' means :- (I)in relation to the Union Territory of

Microfibres Inc. Vs. Girdhar and Co. and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Copyright Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 6, 11, 13, 13(2), 14, 15, 15(1), 15(2), 16, 22, 40, 63, 67; Copyright Act, 1967 - Sections 15; Designs Act, 2000 - Sections 2, 4, 11(2), 12 and 19(1); Design Act of 1911 - Sections 2(5); Patent and Designs Act; Patent Act; Trade Marks Act; U.K. Designs Act, 1949 - Sections 1(3); Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 - Sections 2(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 415, 420 and 479; New Design Rules, 2001; Copyright Law

Reported in : LC2009(2)229; 2009(40)PTC519(Del)

not extinguished by virtue of Section 15(2) of the Copyright Act, 1957. g. 'Design' as defined by the Designs Act, 1911 as well as the Designs Act, 2000; means only the features of shape, configuration, pattern or ornament applied … Reliance was also placed on the judgments in Interlego case (1988) RPC 343, S.S. Sama, Samsonite case : 73(1998)DLT732 ; Deepak Printary, Ahmedabad v. The Forward Stationery Mart and Anr. : (1976)17GLR338 . We might notice that

Urooj Ahmed Vs. Preethi Kitchen Appliances Private Limited

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Mehta (2006) 5 SCC638 (v) The Clan Line Steamers Ltd., V. Gordon Woodroffe & Company 1980 AIR Madras 73; (vi) Microfibres Inc. V. Giridhar & Co., (2009) 40 PTC519Delhi); (vii) State v. Ratan Lal Arora, (2004) 4 … has been incorporated into Section 15 of the Copy Right Act, 1957, with effect from 21.06.2012 by replacing ".Designs Act, 1911"., the embargo provided therein would continue to apply. In other words, it is submitted that in the absence

Music Broadcast Private Limited Vs. Indian Performing Right Society

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Intellectual Property

reads as follows: "15. Special provision regarding copyright in designs registered or capable of being registered under the Designs Act, 1911. - (1) Copyright shall not subsist under this Act in any design which is registered under the Designs … definitive answer shall be given with regard to legitimacy of these claims." 73. I have already referred to the judgment of the learned single Judge … operate and maintain FM radio stations at various places in India. The defendant, a Copyright Society constituted under section 33 of the Copyright Act, 1957 administers the rights of lyricists and composers and issues licences to perform

State of Punjab Vs. Jaswant theatre and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Punjab Municipal Act, 1911 - Sections 62

Reported in : [1990]186ITR655(P& H); (1990)97PLR685

been provided in the notification, and (ii) provisions of Section 61 and Section 62(2) of the Punjab Municipal Act, 1911, were not complied with, i.e., notice inviting objections did not define the class of persons, the description of … will of the Municipal Committee to charge the show tax from any person, nor has any authority been designated to make the assessment. It was further held that neither had machinery for adjudication of the disputes relating

United Mine Workers Vs. Coronado Coal Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : MRTP

course of trade among the states, and inflict upon the public the injuries which the Anti-Trust Act was designed to prevent. Although running the corner was not interstate commerce, the necessary effect of the control of the … by or under the auspices of trades unions are admitted into the mails as second-class mail matter. Acts 1911-1913, c. 389, 37 Stat. 550. The legality of labor unions of postal employees is expressly recognized by Act … restrain and monopolize interstate commerce, in violation of the first and second sections of the Anti-Trust Act, and with having, in the course of that … The Clayton Act -- approved October 15, 1914, § 6, 38 Stat. 730, 731. California -- Penal Code 1906, p. 581. Colorado -- Rev.Stats.1908, §

United States Vs. United Mine Workers

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

the essential facts constituting the contempt charged. P. 330 U. S. 296 . (b) Rule 42(b) was not designed to cast doubt upon the propriety of instituting criminal contempt proceedings on pleadings resting only on information and … CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Syllabus 1. Neither the Norris-LaGuardia Act, 47 Stat. 70, nor § 20 of the Clayton Act, 38 Stat. 738, deprives a federal district court … the National Bituminous Coal Wage Agreement of April 11, 1945. Under that section, either party to the contract was privileged to give ten days' notice … 47 Stat. 70, nor § 20 of the Clayton Act, 38 Stat. 738, deprives a federal district court of jurisdiction to issue a restraining order

ins Vs. Chadha

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

with a single, finely wrought and exhaustively considered procedure. This procedure is an integral part of the constitutional design for the separation of powers. Pp. 462 U. S. 944 -951. (b) Here, the action taken by the … THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Syllabus Section 244(c)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (Act) authorizes either House of Congress, by resolution, to invalidate the decision of the Executive Branch, pursuant to … officer or employee, is a party." Parker v. Levy, 417 U. S. 733 , 417 U. S. 742 , n. 10 (1974), makes clear that