Advanced Search Results

Branch Vs. Smith

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

under 2 U. S. C. § 2c, concluded that § 2c impliedly repealed § 2a(c) and that the 1967 federal Act pre-empted Mississippi's statutory authorization … (Lexis 2001). There has been no interpretation of this provision by the Mississippi courts. We believe it was designed to track 2 U. S. C. §§ 2a(c)(2) and (5), and should be deemed operative when those provisions … 2001, asking the State Chancery Court to issue a redistricting plan for the 2002 elections. In a similar action, appellees and cross-appellants (federal plaintiffs) asked the Federal District Court to enjoin the current plan and any statecourt … reliance on the text of statutes enacted in 1882, 1891, 1901, and 1911-a period in our history long before the 1950's and 1960's when Congress … §§ 2a(c) and 2c to be given effect. Section 2a(c) governs the manner of any election held

Kesavananda Bharati Sripadagalvaru and ors.Vs. State of Kerala and anr ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 1, 2, 3, 4, 4(1), 4(2), 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 13(1), 13(2), 13(3), 13(3), 13(3), 13(4), 14, 15, 15(1), 15(3), 15(4), 16, 16(2), 16(3), 16(4), 16(5), 17, 18, 19, 19(1), 19(1)(f), 19(2), 19(5), 19(6), 19(6), 20, 20(2), 21, 22, 22(1), 22(2), 22(3), 22(4), 23, 24, 25, 25(1), 25(2), 26, 26, 26, 27, 28, 29, 29(1), 29(2), 30, 30(1), 30(2), 31, 31, 31, 31(1), 31(2), 31(2A), 31(2B), 31(3), 31(4), 31(5), 31(5), 31(6), 31A, 31A(1), 31A(2), 31B, 31C, 32, 32(1), 32(2), 32(4), 33, 34, 35, 35, 37, 38, 39, 39(B), 39, 39, 39(C), 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 46(1), 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 56(1), 59, 60, 61, 61(1), 62, 64, 66, 68, 69, 72, 73, 73(1), 73(2), 74, 75, 75(1), 75(4), 76, 76(2), 77(2), 79, 83, 83(2), 85, 85(1), 88, 89, 100, 102(1), 103(1), 103(3)

Reported in : AIR1973SC1461; (1973)4SCC225; [1973]SuppSCR1

be made therein under Article 372, continue in force until altered or repealed or amended by Parliament.83. Here, all the three words are used giving … provided for under Article 368 was conferred not on Parliament but on the two Houses of Parliament as designated body and, therefore, the provisional Parliament was not competent to exercise that power under Article 379. Fourthly, in … 368, as it existed prior to its amendment; Part IV with the validity of the Constitution (Twenty-fourth Amendment) Act; Part V with the validity of Section 2 of the Constitution (Twenty-fifth Amendment) Act; Part VI with the

Brij Kishore Verma Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

U.S. 250, 58 L.Ed. 206. W.D.Wash. 1914. Judicial Code, Act March 3, 1911, c. 231, 36 Stat. 1162, 28 U.S.C.A. $$ 1253, 2101, 2281, 2284; … the commencement of the Constitution shall continue in force, until altered or repealed or amended by a competent Legislature or other competent authority. Under Clause … under:- "Government of India Ministry of Home Affairs 2A, Mansingh Road, New Delhi ­ 110 011 No.9/66/09-CD … the discharge of which little or no discretion is legally permissible. Potentially important legal consequences flow from the designation of a function as legislative, executive or administrative, judicial (or quasi-judicial), or ministerial. Precise definition of these categories … petitions, are as under: “(i) Whether the issuance of notification under section 11 of the U.P. Land Revenue Act read with section 21 of the U.P. General Clauses Act by the Governor is legislative act or administrative

Wesberry Vs. Sanders

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

was whether the Act of June 18, 1929, 46 Stat. 21, had repealed certain provisions of the Act of Aug. 8, 1911, 37 Stat. 13. … duplicates, in effect, was carried forward in each subsequent apportionment statute through 1911. [ Footnote 2/46 ] There was no reapportionment following the 1920 census. … Cong., 1st Sess., which amends 2 U.S.C. § 2a to provide: "(c) Each State entitled to more … power "might be so construed as to deprive the states of an essential right, which, in the true design of the Constitution, was to be reserved to them. [ Footnote 2/25 ]" He proposed a resolution explaining … to realign that State's congressional districts more nearly to equalize the population of each. They brought this class action under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1988 and 28 U.S.C. § 1343(3), asking that the apportionment statute be … the Fourteenth Amendment, and (3) that part of Section 2 of the Fourteenth Amendment which provides that

Goodyear Atomic Corp. Vs. Miller

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

intentional injury and 15% increase for intentional failure to comply with statute); 1911 Mass.Acts, ch. 751, pt. 2, § 3 (100% increase if injury caused … (15% increase for violation of statute); see also 2A A. Larson, Law of Workmen's Compensation § 69.10 … State would simply burden the federal instrumentality, interfere with its operations, and frustrate the federal objectives it is designed to achieve. Nonetheless, the law has long been settled that such regulation cannot be imposed on federal instrumentalities … the application of the provision. The contention that the above-quoted, undefined phrase applies only to typical workers' compensation Acts, and not to the additional award provision, cannot be squared with § 290's plain language, which places no … safety regulations. Nothing in the 1954 Act, however, expresses an intent to repeal § 290 as applied to nuclear production facilities, nor can we read … the provision to workers at the Portsmouth facility. Section 290 provides in relevant part: "Whatsoever constituted authority