Advanced Search Results

Morgan Securities and Credits P. Vs. State of Delhi and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

proceedings in an attempt to pressurize petitioners.19. Attention of this Court was also drawn to Section 10 of Depositories Act, 1996 which governs the rights of depositories and the Beneficial Owner. The manner of invocation of the pledge is … and wrongful loss to the complainant. That on the basis of the complaint, above case was registered on 07.09.05 at PS Connaught Place and investigation was taken up by local police. That subsequently, the investigation of the

Anju Timblo, Managing Director of Fomento Resorts and Hotels Ltd. and ...

Court : Mumbai Goa

Subject : Company

cannot be said to be transfer of business as such. The learned Senior Counsel submitted that under the Depositories Act, 1996 (under the new regime), the shares are held in a dematerialised (demat form). It is submitted that, it … that the first respondent filed two applications being CA.No.5/2013, which is an application for amendment, under order VI, rule 17 of C.P.C., read with Regulations 44 and 46 of the Company Law Board Regulations (Regulations, for short)

Bharat Overseas Bank Ltd. Vs. Saritha Synthetic and Industries Ltd.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : CompanyCivil

Acts : Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 - Sections 19; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 433; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 176; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 130; Sale of Goods Act, 1930

Reported in : 2004(4)ALD205; 2004(3)ALT85; IV(2004)BC282; [2004]120CompCas419(AP); (2004)4CompLJ401(AP); [2005]60SCL424(AP)

nor can the petitioner be termed to be a beneficial owner as defined under Section 2(1)(a) of the Depositories Act, 1996. Inasmuch as the respondent had failed and neglected to pay the loan amount and has become insolvent, learned … petition under Sections 433(e) and 439 of the Companies Act, 1956 (for short 'the Companies Act'), read with Rule 95 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959, for winding up of the respondent, namely, M/s. Saritha Synthetic and

Smt. Asha JaIn and anr. Vs. Sh. Anil Kumar JaIn A+

Court : Delhi

Subject : Property

Acts : Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 - Sections 2, 2(1), 3, 3(3), 4(1), 4(2) and 4(3); ;Depositories Act, 1996 - Section 10(1); ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 12, Rule 6; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973

daughter;(b) the securities held by a(i) depository as registered owner under Sub-section (1) of Section 10 of the Depositories Act, 1996(ii) participant as an agent of a depository.(3) Whoever enters into any benami transaction shall be punishable with … pointing to the averments in the reply to I.A. No. 11139/2009 filed by the plaintiffs (Under Order 12 Rule 6) to say that the consideration for the 50% share was paid in cash. Para 3 of the … (a) of Relief Clause is decreed in the above terms. List on 07.10.2010. - What remains to be seen is as to whether Pinki died

Preeti & Ors. vs Priya

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

partner, director of a company, a depository or a participant as an agent of a depository under the Depositories Act, 1996 (22 of 1996) and any other person as may be notified by the Central Government for this purpose;(iii)

Sangita Mundhra vs.madhurica Mundhra

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

or a CS(OS) 343/2017 Page 3 of 7 8. participant as an agent of a depository under the Depositories Act, 1996 (22 of 1996) and any other person as may be notified by the Central Government for this purpose;

Sh Rajeev Tandon & Anr vs.smt Rashmi Tandon

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

partner, director of a company, a depository or a participant as an agent of a depository under the Depositories Act, 1996 and any other person as may be notified by the Central Government for this purpose; (iii) any person … JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.IA No.14323/2016 1. This application is filed by the plaintiffs under Order 12 Rule 6 CPC seeking a decree based on admissions. The plaintiffs have filed the suit for permanent and mandatory … Tandon on 03.04.2011 and the grandmother, namely, Smt. Sheela Wati Tandon on 07.06.2014. It is also pleaded that in a suit filed by the uncle-Mr.Rajesh

Balram Garg Vs. Securities And Exchange Board Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

of India Act, 1992 (15 of 1992), the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 25 1956 (42 of 1956), the Depositories Act, 1996 (22 of 1996) or the Companies Act, 2013 (18 of 2013) and rules and regulations made thereunder shall … on Balram Garg or consulted Balram Garg in any decision related to trading in securities. Presumption is a rule of evidence which cannot be drawn unless and until such foundational facts are proved. ii. That no material … Balram Garg, the appellant in C.A. No.7054/2021, filed his reply 4 (dated 07.08.2020) to the allegations made against him, wherein he stated the following: i.

The Commissioner of Income-tax. Vs. Shri Bharat R. RuiA.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 43(3), 43(5) ; Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 - Sections 2(ac), 2(h), 18A ;

(42 of 1956) or the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 (15 of 1992) or the Depositories Act, 1996 (22 of 1996) and the rules, regulations or bye-laws made or directions issued under those Acts or by … recognized stock exchange and settled on the clearing house of the recognized stock exchange in accordance with the rules and bye laws of such stock exchange. Thus, the transactions in derivatives is legal and valid only if

Sebi Vs. Shri R.M. Meyappan

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Subject : Direct Taxation

of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act or the rules made there under; (d) contravenes the provisions of the Depositories Act, 1996 or the rules made there under; (e) contravenes the rules, regulations or bye laws of the stock exchange, … broker has ceased to be a member of MSE w.e.f. 21.08.2001. 3.1.2 In this regard, I note that Rule 4 of the SEBI (Stock brokers and sub brokers) Rules, 1992 (hereinafter referred to as "the broker regulations")