Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: depositories act 1996 rule 06 · Page 1 of about 45 results (0.023 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 11 2018

b.k Educational Services Pvt Ltd Vs. Parag Gupta and Associates

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-11-2018

Subject : Land Acquisition

8 Securities Appellate Tribunal under Appellate Tribunal under Securities & Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 Appellate Tribunal Depositories Act, 1996 Appellate Tribunal Securities (Regulation) Act, 1956 Appellate Tribunal under Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority Act, 2013 under … doctrines such as acquiescence and estoppel on the facts of each case, there being no hard and fast rule that once a period of limitation was over, the application must be 10 dismissed. He also relied upon … Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Second 1 Amendment) Act, 2018 with effect from 06.06.2018. The said Section is as follows: “238A. Limitation.-The provisions of the Limitation

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 23 2012

Rudra Pratap Duttaa Vs. Satendra Nath Duttaa and Others

Court : Patna

Decided on : Feb-23-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

the securities held by a - (i) depository as registered owner under sub-section (1) section 10 of the Depositories Act, 1996. (ii) participant as an agent of a depository. Explanation - The expressions “depository” and “participants” shall b the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 25 2014

K.R.Rajeesh Kumar Vs. K.Nalini Raghavan

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-25-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

held by a - (i) depository as registered owner under sub section (1) of section 10 of the Depositories Act, 1996. (ii) participant as an agent or of a depository. Explanation:- The expressions depository and Participants shall have the … Plaintiff Vs. 1.K.R.Rajeesh Kumar 2.K.R.Ranjiv Ragav 3.Simi 4.Shika Defendants Prayer:- These Civil Suits are filed under Order IV Rule 1 of Original Side Rules and Order VII Rule 1 of CPC. For Plaintiff : Mr.V.M.G.Ramakannan-CS.469/2008 Mr.S.R.Raghunathan-CS.847/2009 For … IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:25. 06.2014 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE ARUNA JAGADEESAN CS.Nos.469/2008 and 847/2009 CS.No.469/2008:- K.R.Rajeesh Kumar

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 26 2010

Smt. Asha JaIn and anr. Vs. Sh. Anil Kumar JaIn A+

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-26-2010

Subject : Property

Acts : Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 - Sections 2, 2(1), 3, 3(3), 4(1), 4(2) and 4(3); ;Depositories Act, 1996 - Section 10(1); ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 12, Rule 6; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973

daughter;(b) the securities held by a(i) depository as registered owner under Sub-section (1) of Section 10 of the Depositories Act, 1996(ii) participant as an agent of a depository.(3) Whoever enters into any benami transaction shall be punishable with … pointing to the averments in the reply to I.A. No. 11139/2009 filed by the plaintiffs (Under Order 12 Rule 6) to say that the consideration for the 50% share was paid in cash. Para 3 of the … ground floor. The plaintiffs trace their title to a Registered Deed dated 06.07.2000. The suit mentions that the original owner of the property was one

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 28 2019

Sh Rajeev Tandon & Anr vs.smt Rashmi Tandon

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-28-2019

Subject : Land Acquisition

partner, director of a company, a depository or a participant as an agent of a depository under the Depositories Act, 1996 and any other person as may be notified by the Central Government for this purpose; (iii) any person … JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.IA No.14323/2016 1. This application is filed by the plaintiffs under Order 12 Rule 6 CPC seeking a decree based on admissions. The plaintiffs have filed the suit for permanent and mandatory … property being D-404, Defence Colony, New Delhi.3. The defendant got married on 06.02.1998 and pursuant to her marriage started residing in her matrimonial home in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 27 2026

Preeti & Ors. vs Priya

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-27-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

partner, director of a company, a depository or a participant as an agent of a depository under the Depositories Act, 1996 (22 of 1996) and any other person as may be notified by the Central Government for this purpose;(iii)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 21 2003

P. Ravinder Vs. National Stock Exchange of India Ltd.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-21-2003

Subject : Company

Acts : Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 - Sections 9, 13 and 15; Securities Contracts (Regulation) Rules, 1957; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : [2004]121CompCas275(AP); (2004)4CompLJ201(AP); [2004]49SCL43(AP)

National Stock Exchange and the concept of dematerialisation of securities four statutory basis under the provisions of the Depositories Act, 1996 brought some main changes both in fact and in law in the day to day functioning of the … a particular 'security' whether in his capacity as a stock broker (agent 06 the owner of the security) or for himself le., as a principal.30. … returns and to direct inquiries to be made. Section 8 gives power to the Central Government to direct rules to be made or make (sic) Section 9 gives power of recognized Stock Exchanges to make bye-laws. This

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 19 2016

Messer Holdings Ltd. Vs. Shyam Madanmohan Ruia and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-19-2016

Subject : Arbitration

of shares in companies by virtue of amendments in the Companies Act, 1956 and the advent of the Depositories Act, 1996 etc. We make this observation because the 75001 shares acquired by MGG pursuant to AGREEMENT-II could not be … GGL filed two applications seeking certain interim orders. I.A. No.7248 of 1998 in the SUIT-I invoking Order 39 Rule 1&2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as “CPC”) and OMP No.205 of 1998

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 30 2016

Eskays Construction Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Soma Papers and Industries Ltd. and ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-30-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

intended to further amend the SARFAESI Act, the RDDB Act, the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 and the Depository Act, 1996 and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. 14. Having noted the purpose and object of the Act, … B.P. Colabawalla, J. 1. Rule. Respondents waive service. By consent of parties, rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally. 2. This Writ Petition

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 25 2016

JM Financial Asset Reconstruction Company Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Mahar ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-25-2016

Subject : MRTP

intended to further amend the SARFAESI Act, the RDDB Act, the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 and the Depository Act, 1996 and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. 16. Section 2 of the SARFAESI Act is the definitions … taken, but shall not finalize the same until further orders of this Court. Thereafter, on 12 August, 2014, rule was issued in this Writ Petition and the ad-interim relief granted on 11th June, 2013 was continued as

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial