Advanced Search Results

Morgan Securities and Credits P. Vs. State of Delhi and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

proceedings in an attempt to pressurize petitioners.19. Attention of this Court was also drawn to Section 10 of Depositories Act, 1996 which governs the rights of depositories and the Beneficial Owner. The manner of invocation of the pledge is

Unity Realty and Developers Ltd., Under the Companies Act, 1956 Vs. Bw ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : ArbitrationCompany

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 7 and 9; Companies Act - Sections 83, 108(3), 260 to 262, 284, 319, 330 and 391 to 394; Depository Act, 1996 - Sections 10 and 11

Reported in : 2010(1)BomCR333; 2009(111)BomLR3853

2.26. On 01.06.2009, the petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short, the Act) for various interim injunctions and measures and protections.27. The existence of arbitration clause and … inter se arrangement between them shall be referred to and finally resolved by arbitration in accordance with the Rules of the Singapore International Arbitration Centre held at Mumbai, irrespective of the amount in dispute or whether such … constitution of the Arbitral Tribunal of Mr. Manoj Thakar. The notice dated 04.08.2009 and the statement of dispute as required under Clause 3 of the

Raman Jain vs.magan Mala Jain & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

partner, director of a company, a depository or a participant as an agent of a depository under the Depositories Act, 1996(22 of 1996) and any other person as may be notified by the Central Government for this purpose; … common to be clearly pleaded and hotchpotch have mentioned and which requirement legal requirement because of Order VI Rule 4 CPC which provides that all necessary factual details of the cause of action must be clearly stated.

Preeti & Ors. vs Priya

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

partner, director of a company, a depository or a participant as an agent of a depository under the Depositories Act, 1996 (22 of 1996) and any other person as may be notified by the Central Government for this purpose;(iii)

V.J.Deenadayalan vs Jayamani

Court : Chennai

partner, director of a company, a depository or a participant as an agent of a depository under the Depositories Act, 1996 (22 of 1996) and any other person as may be notified by the Central Government for this purpose;(iii) … AS No.267 of 2013 (MKKSJ & VSGJ) Prayer in AS No.267/2013: This appeal is filed under Order 41 Rule 1 read with Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to set aside the decree and judgment

Sh Rajeev Tandon & Anr vs.smt Rashmi Tandon

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

partner, director of a company, a depository or a participant as an agent of a depository under the Depositories Act, 1996 and any other person as may be notified by the Central Government for this purpose; (iii) any person … JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.IA No.14323/2016 1. This application is filed by the plaintiffs under Order 12 Rule 6 CPC seeking a decree based on admissions. The plaintiffs have filed the suit for permanent and mandatory

Balram Garg Vs. Securities And Exchange Board Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

of India Act, 1992 (15 of 1992), the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 25 1956 (42 of 1956), the Depositories Act, 1996 (22 of 1996) or the Companies Act, 2013 (18 of 2013) and rules and regulations made thereunder shall … on Balram Garg or consulted Balram Garg in any decision related to trading in securities. Presumption is a rule of evidence which cannot be drawn unless and until such foundational facts are proved. ii. That no material

Messer Holdings Ltd. Vs. Shyam Madanmohan Ruia and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Arbitration

of shares in companies by virtue of amendments in the Companies Act, 1956 and the advent of the Depositories Act, 1996 etc. We make this observation because the 75001 shares acquired by MGG pursuant to AGREEMENT-II could not be … GGL filed two applications seeking certain interim orders. I.A. No.7248 of 1998 in the SUIT-I invoking Order 39 Rule 1&2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as “CPC”) and OMP No.205 of 1998 … occasions pursuant to the orders of the Bombay High Court dated 22.02.2000, 04.10.2002 and 08.06.2011. The prayer in SUIT-II after such Amendments; “Rider-I(a) (a) (i)

The Commissioner of Income-tax. Vs. Shri Bharat R. RuiA.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 43(3), 43(5) ; Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 - Sections 2(ac), 2(h), 18A ;

(42 of 1956) or the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 (15 of 1992) or the Depositories Act, 1996 (22 of 1996) and the rules, regulations or bye-laws made or directions issued under those Acts or by … recognized stock exchange and settled on the clearing house of the recognized stock exchange in accordance with the rules and bye laws of such stock exchange. Thus, the transactions in derivatives is legal and valid only if

Sebi Vs. S. Satnaliwala and Co.

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Subject : MRTP

provisions of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act or the rules made thereunder; (d) contravenes the provisions of the Depositories Act, 1996 or the rules made thereunder; (e) contravenes the rules, regulations or bye laws of the stock exchange, shall … broker has ceased to be a member of CSE w.e.f. 28.01.2002. 3.1.3 In this regard, I note that Rule 4 of the SEBI (Stock brokers and sub brokers) Rules, 1992 (hereinafter referred to as "the broker regulations")