Advanced Search Results

Pan Asia Advisors International Corporate Finance Minster House and An ...

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Subject : MRTP

of 1993 and not in the SEBI Act, 1992, or the Securities Contracts (Regulations) Act, 1956, or the Depositories Act (1996), or the existing Companies Act, 1956. Section 2(c) of the said Scheme reads as follows :- “2(c) Global … instance of Issuer Companies located in India, by a Lead Manager registered in the UK and governed by regulations framed and enforced by a foreign regulator, are amenable to the jurisdiction of an Indian regulator namely, the … Honble SAT in matter of V. Natarajan vs. SEBI (Order dated June 29, 2011 in Appeal no. 104 of 2011) wherein it was held: “…

Anju Timblo, Managing Director of Fomento Resorts and Hotels Ltd. and ...

Court : Mumbai Goa

Subject : Company

cannot be said to be transfer of business as such. The learned Senior Counsel submitted that under the Depositories Act, 1996 (under the new regime), the shares are held in a dematerialised (demat form). It is submitted that, it … applications being CA.No.5/2013, which is an application for amendment, under order VI, rule 17 of C.P.C., read with Regulations 44 and 46 of the Company Law Board Regulations (Regulations, for short) and Company Application No.58/2013 for impleading … party could not have raised the matter before the commencement of trial.â? 29. It is the alternate submission that even if the provisions of the

Pentamedia Graphics Limited, Ment and softowers Rep. by Dr. V. Chandra ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 55A, 73, 73(1)(A), 101, 235 to 251, 391, 391(1), 391(2), 391(7), 392, 394 and 394A; Securities Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 - Sections 11B, 11(4), 55A, 77 and 77A; Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956; Securities Exchange Board of India (Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices relating to Securities Market) Regulations, 2003 - Regulation 2, 3, 4(2), 24, 34 and 35; Depositories Act, 1996; Securities Contract Regulation and Rules, 1957 - Rule 19 and 19(2); Depositories Act, 1956; Securities Exchange Board of India Rules; Securities Exchange Board of India Regulation

Reported in : [2008]145CompCas327(Mad)

purpose of this sub-clause, 'securities laws' mean the SEBI Act, 1992, the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956, the Depositories Act, 1996 and the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 which are administered by SEBI under Section 55A thereof, the

Prakash Gupta Vs. Securities And Exchange Board Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

SEBI issued guidelines for consent orders under Sections 15T of the SEBI Act and Section 23A of the Depositories Act, 1996, and for compounding of offences under Section 24A of the SEBI Act, Section 22A of the Depositories Act … The Company was investigated for the period between 28 January 1996 and 29 February 1996. This was the period immediately preceding the listing of the … issued by SEBI to the appellant under Section 11(3) of the SEBI Act regarding a potential violation of Regulations 4(a) and 4(e) of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices

Milan Mahendra Securities Pvt. Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of In ...

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Subject : Right to Information

and, therefore, for all purposes, the appellant became the beneficial owner of those shares. Section 2(1)(a) of the Depositories Act, 1996 defines a beneficial owner to mean a person whose name is recorded as such with a depository. Admittedly, … dated 22.4.2003 passed by the adjudicating officer imposing a penalty of Rs. 1,50,000/- on the appellant for violating Regulation 7 (1) and (2) of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) … (2) of the Regulations. It is alleged that the appellant acquired on 29.10.2000 10 lac shares of Shonkh Technologies International Ltd. (for short the target

Morgan Securities and Credits P. Vs. State of Delhi and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

invocation of the pledge is also specified under the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Depositories and Participants) Regulations, 1996. During the course of hearing, attention of this Court was drawn to Regulation 58 of aforesaid Regulations … proceedings in an attempt to pressurize petitioners.19. Attention of this Court was also drawn to Section 10 of Depositories Act, 1996 which governs the rights of depositories and the Beneficial Owner. The manner of invocation of the pledge is … and also asked for return of their pledged shares vide letter dt. 29.06.05. The MSCPL through its letter dt. 02.07.05 asked the MLL to pay

Tej Prakash S. Dangi and ors. Vs. Coramandal Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act - Sections 2(11), 10, 10(1), 17, 79, 101, 102, 107, 111, 111A, 155, 209(4), 235, 237, 284, 391, 394, 395, 397 to 407 and 425 to 560; Depositories Ordinance, 1996; Securities and Exchange Board of India Act; Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959

Reported in : [2002]108CompCas516(AP)

company,has since been deleted from 31 May, 1991, by the Amendment Act of 1988 andthat besides, by the Depositories Ordinance, 1996, Section 111 of the Act has beenconfined to private companies, and a new Section 111A has … shares has been made in contravention of the provisionsof the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act or regulations made thereunder orin violation of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985. Evidently,the law has not made … is provided only in the articles of association of the company. Article 29 of the articles providesthat when a member fails to pay any call

Chatterjee Petrochem (i) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Haldia Petrochemicals Ltd. and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Company Law

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 397, 398, 399, 402, 403, 406, 10F, 619-B; Indian Companies Act, 1913; Companies Act, 1948 - Section 210

made certain submissions with regard to the Agreement of 8th March, 2002, read with the requirements of the Depositories Act, 1996, SEBI (Depositories and Participants) Regulations, 1996 and the bye-laws and business rules/operating instructions issued by the depositories, we … Agreement of 8th March, 2002, read with the requirements of the Depositories Act, 1996, SEBI (Depositories and Participants) Regulations, 1996 and the bye-laws and business rules/operating instructions issued by the depositories, we shall, if need be, refer … that agreement, CP(M)C came to be in management control of the Company. 29. Mr. Nariman urged that by signing the Share Subscription Agreement dated 30th

Ptc India Financial Services Ltd. Vs. Mr. Venkateshwarlu Kari

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT SANJIV KHANNA, J.The primary legal issue which arises for consideration in this appeal is whether the Depositories Act, 1996 read with the Regulation 58 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Depositories and Participants) Regulations, 19961 … pledge his special property or interest in the goods. Relying on Halsbury’s Law of England, 3rd Edition, Vol. 29, page 222, it is observed that on the bankruptcy of the pawnor, the pawnee is a secured creditor

Bombay Dyeing and Mfg. Co. Ltd. Vs. Arun Kumar Bajoria

Court : Company Law Board CLB

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2001)107CompCas535

shares in the name of a Bank with that of the respondents especially when section 12 of the Depositories Act requires that in case of a pledge of securities, various information have to be furnished to the depository … Ramanna v. T. Jayaprakash [1998] 92 Comp. Cas. 517 (Kar.) and K. Narasimhiah v. HC Singri Gowda AIR 1996 SC 330 that "Giving of anything as ordinarily understood in the English language is not complete unless it … petition on the ground that these respondents had failed to comply with Regulation 7 of SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares & Takeover) Regulations 1997 (Take … also about this acquisition beyond 5 per cent by a letter dated 29-3-2000. Therefore the respondents had complied with the requirement of Regulation 7 of