Advanced Search Results

State of Gujarat and anr. Vs. K.A. Patel and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Service

Reported in : (1973)14GLR730

person shall not be eligible for being considered for appointment as a clerk unless he has passed sub-service departmental examination. The passing of sub-service departmental examination is not a qualification which must be possessed by a candidate … has to go on and the State can, in exercise of its executive power, make recruitment to the services and regulate the conditions of service. The executive power of the State extends to all matters with respect … in the cadre of Aval Karkuns, such condition was superseded by statutory rules of recruitment made by the State Government on 22nd July 1966 in

Subrata Deb Barma and ors. Vs. State of Tripura and anr.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Service

Acts : Tripura Civil Services (Training and Departmental Examination) Rules, 1975 - Rules 20 and 22

as per Rule 20 of Tripura Civil Services (Training and Departmental Examination) Rules, 1975 (hereafter called the Rules, 1975) they are to undergo training and … writ petitions, the petitioners seek for a writ or order directing them to be exempted from participating a departmental examination and also releasing their increments and also for a direction that the petitioners shall be deemed to … the petitioners in WP(C) No. 35 of 2000.The petitioners have been appointed in the Grade-II of Tripura Civil Services by promotion vide Notification No. F.2(1)-GA/90(iii) dated 6.7.1991 and put under probation for two years. They were allowed

Jagdish Lal and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Service

Acts : Departmental Service Rules

Reported in : AIR1988P& H272

and the condition of age at the time of their first ad hoc/temporary appointment in accordance with the Departmental Service Rules and instructions issued by the Government; (iii) that their record of service is satisfactory; (iv) that … This is a petition for the issue of a writ of mandamus directing, the Government to regularise the services of the petitioners as Masters/Mistresses in terms of the Government instructions dated March 29. 1985, as amended by

Sunil Sikri Vs. Guru Harkrishan Public School

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

institutions, including minority institutions, is not questioned. It is contended that Fundamental Rule 54 applies only to a departmental appeal. In the case of a complaint about subsistence allowance, a departmental appeal lies; 4 (2001) 10 SCC4455 … employee/workman, the financial condition of the employer and similar other factors. 38.3. Ordinarily, an employee or workman whose services are terminated and who is desirous of getting back wages is required to either plead or at least … very same year on the 31st December, 1973, the Delhi School Education Rules, 1973 were promulgated. The said Rules are referred to as “the Rules”.

Dr. Prasanna Kumar Agarwal Vs. State Bank of India and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Service

Acts : State Bank of India (Supervising Staff) Service Rules - Sections 50A(1)

the writ petition that the authority/Bank-respondent had decided that the suspension of the petitioner will continue till the departmental action against him is concluded. 3. The case of the petitioner is resisted by the respondents by filing … under suspension with immediate effect in terms of Rule 50A(i) of the State Bank of India (Supervising Staff) Service Rules as the Bank authority had decided not to allow the petitioner to continue in the active service

Chandra Prakash Shahi Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service Constitution

Acts : U.P Temporary Government Servants (Termination of Service) Rules 1975 - Rule 3; Constitution of India - Article 311(2), 226; U.P. Pradeshik Armed Constabulary Act, 1948 (40 of 1948)

Reported in : AIR2000SC1816; JT2000(5)SC181; 2000(4)SCALE209; (2000)5SCC152; (2000)2UPLBEC1661; [2000] 3 SCR 529; AIR 2000 SC 1706

in nature. The appellant, it is contended, could not have been removed from service without holding a regular departmental enquiry. It is further contended that the courts including the Tribunal constituted under the U.P. Public Services (Tribunal) … by a simple notice in terms of Rule 3 of the U.P. Temporary Government Servants (Termination of Service) Rules, 1975. The order of termination was challenged by the appellant before the U.P. Public Service Tribunal which, by

J.M. Mehta Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 226, 227, 311 and 311(2); Bombay Civil Service Rules, 1959 - Rules 16(1) and 152(2) - Sections 161; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 23, Rule 1; Bihar Service Code - Rule 74

Reported in : (1991)1GLR619; (1992)IILLJ282Guj

in his report the State Govt. has proceeded to exercise powers under Rule 161 of the Bombay Civil Services Rules, and has prematurely retired the petitioner for specific misconduct for which departmental enquiry was recommended by the Vigilance

Abiram Pegu Vs. State of Assam and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : ServiceCivil

Acts : Departmental Service Rules

same very D.E.E.O. again by his letter dated 03.05.2003 asked the petitioner to show cause as to why departmental action should not be taken against him for filing the writ petition without informing the departmental authority. On … their approach to the Court allegedly in violation of the Departmental Service Rules. This led to the withdrawal of the case by Shri Tarun Pegu, … of Annexure-4 letter dated 21.10.2003 asking the Head Master of the school of the petitioner to forward his Service Book which was duly produced by the said Head Master. Thereafter the same very respondent issued the impugned

Ravi Kumar Verma Vs. the Bihar State Electricity Board and ors.

Court : Patna

Subject : Service

Acts : Bihar Pension Rules, 1950 - Rules 43 and 139; Constitution of India - Article 31(1)

purchase of plain water in the name of Chemical Additive from Jitan v. Company, New Delhi, and a departmental proceeding was initiated against him, vide Board's Resolution No. 761 dated 25-4-1996, contained in Annexure 1. The petitioner … AIR 1990 SC 1923, the apex Court while considering the scope of Rule 9 of the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules held that 'The employee's right to pension is a statutory right. The measure of deprivation, therefore,

Ulhas S/O Yadavrao Somwanshi, Vs. the State of Maharashtra Through Its ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Maharashtra Development Services Class-I and Class-II (Departmental Examinations) Rules, 1991 - Rules 2, 3, 4, 5, 5(2) and 7; Madhya Pradesh Civil Services (General Conditions of Service) Rules, 1961 - Rule 12; Maharashtra Development Service (Constitution, Classification and Recruitment) Rules, 1973; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16 and 226

Reported in : 2008(2)ALLMR536; 2008(3)BomCR99

of the action of the Government deleting/excluding the names of petitioners from the select list prepared by the Departmental Promotion Committee for promotion to the posts in Maharashtra Development Services Class-I (which was the result of action … the Constitution of India and also being contrary to the Maharashtra Development Services Class-I and Class-II (Departmental Examinations) Rules, 1991. Both the writ petitions also pray for quashment of the action of the Government deleting/excluding the names