Advanced Search Results

R.K. Bali (Dr.) Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; The Dental Council Act, 1948 - Sections 3, 6 and 7

Reported in : 2000IIAD(Delhi)673

order dated 6.11.1997. The fourth respondent challenged the election before the Central Government under Section 5 of the Dentists Act, 1948.2. The matter was argued at length by the learned counsel for the parties. The facts necessary for the

George Thomas Vs. State of Kerala and anr.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1987CriLJ1311

was practising dentistry at Erattupetta. He has no qualification or registration to practise dentistry. Section 49 of the Dentists Act, 1948 (Central Act XVI of 1948) (for short the Act) prohibits a person from practising dentistry unless that person … appellate courts, but the learned Sessions Judge repelled those contentions. I shall now proceed to consider those points.3. Section 52 of the Act reads thus:No Court shall take cognizance of any offence punishable under this Act except upon

Shri Gaurav Uday Nagarsekar Vs. State of Goa Through Its Chief Secreta ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Dentist Act, 1948 - Sections 20 and 20(2); Medical Council of India Act 1956; UGC Act - Sections 3, 26, 26(1) and 107(2); University Act; Teachers Education Act, 1993; Tamil Nadu Private Colleges (Regulation) Act, 1976; Madras University Act, 1923; Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 - Sections 20; 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act; Uttar Pradesh Post Graduate Medical Education (Reservation for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes) Act, 1997; Goa (Rules for admission to Post Graduate Degree Courses of the Goa University at the Goa Dental College and Hospital) Rules, 1998; Dental Council of India Regulation, 2007; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 162, 246, 254, 254(1) and 254(2)

Reported in : 2009(4)BomCR117; 2009(111)BomLR2323

in dispute that respondent No. 3-Dental Council of India is a distinct authority functioning under the provisions of Dentist Act 1948 while the Medical Council of India is a separate authority functioning under an all together different … dispute that respondent No. 3-Dental Council of India is a distinct authority functioning under the provisions of Dentist Act 1948 while the Medical Council of India is a separate authority functioning under an all together different enactment under … it was not covered by List 2 of List 3. In Paragraph 52, Hon'ble Apex Court has noticed that there the Court held that after … background, in Paragraph 18, Hon'ble Apex Court has observed as under:18. Under Section 3 of the Act, deemed university status will be given to those

Orissa Management Colleges Association and Etc. Vs. State of Orissa an ...

Court : Orissa

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : AIR2007Ori120; 104(2007)CLT310

of the petitioner to hold the Common Entrance Test as It was held in the last year.25. The Dentists Act, 1948 was enacted for the purpose of laying down standards of education and training in Dental Colleges. After the … come out with a detailed well thought out legislation on the subject. 52. It is well settled that a judgment is an authority for what … necessary amendment petitions were filed by the petitioners and the amendments were allowed.10. The said Act has 19 Sections. A perusal of the preamble of the said Act makes it clear that the enactment is inspired by

Teerthanker Mahaveer Institute of Management Vs. Union of India and or ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Act by amending Act 31/93. Similarly, the provisions of Sections 10A 10B and 10Cwere also incorporated in the Dentists Act, 1948. Sub-section (1) of Section 10A of the Act provides that no person shall establish a medical college or … college both for 100 as well as 150 admissions. Drawing attention of this Court to Annexure P8 (page 52 of the paper book), the counsel pointed out that the assessment under Section 10A for the third batch

Association of Private Dental and Medical Colleges and ors. Vs. the St ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : 2009(3)MPHT418

Surgery) awarded by an Indian University in respect of recognised Dental College under Section 10 (2) of the Dentists Act, 1948 or an equivalent qualification recognised by the Dental Council of India and should have obtained permanent registration with

Christian Medical College Vellore and ors Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

governed by the Dentists Act, 1948. Mr. Radhakrishnan submitted that the impugned Regulations were also ultra vires the Dentists Act, 1948, Section 20 whereof empowers the Dental Council of India to prescribe conditions for admission to the courses for training … the Regulations had been made under Entry 25 of List III. Mr. Gupta pointed out that in paragraph 52 of the judgment in Preeti Srivastava's case (supra), this Court had held that the impugned Regulations had been

R.V. Dental College Etc. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Civil

Acts : Dentists Act, 1948 - Sections 10, 10A, 10B and 10C; Karnataka Universities Act, 1976 - Sections 53; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : AIR2001Kant302; ILR2001KAR3502

Sciences?5. I shall deal with the questions ad seriatim :--Re. Question No. 1 : Section 10C of the Dentists Act, 1948, deals with Institutions established after the 1st day of June, 1992 and on or before the commencement of … actually it is the management of the college which has to submit the application as is evident from Section 52 (2) (b) which provides that the college has to be under the management of a duly constituted governing

Monika Pahwa Vs. Director of Medical Education

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Karnataka State Universities Act, 1976 - Sections 53(10); ;Dentists Act, 1948 - Sections 10A(1); Dentists (Amendment) Act, 1993

Reported in : ILR1996KAR845; 1996(6)KarLJ365

College as per the BDS Regulations framed by the Dental Council of India under Section 20 of the Dentists Act, 1948. It means, the respondent College cannot in any circumstance admit more than 60 students in the first year … facts of the present case, I find that as against the permissible intake of 60, as held above, 52 admissions are in conformity with the Rules i.e. 28 free seats, 22 payment seats and 9 seats under

Chander Kanta vs Delhi Dental Council and Anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

Constitution of India. It is further asserted that DDC/Respondent No. 1 is a statutory body established under the Dentists Act, 1948, and that the Respondent No.2/ Govt. of NCT Ministry of Health, New Delhi also fall within the ambit … New Delhi on 04.09.2012. The Notices were issued to the Respondents, but it was found that Notification under Section 14(3) CAT Act, 1985 in respect of DDC, was not notified and the Petitioner thus, withdrew her OA