Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: dentists act 1948 section 22 · Page 1 of about 87 results (0.020 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 29 2001

Dental Council of India and anr. Vs. Hari Parkash and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-29-2001

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Dentists Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 10; All India Institute of Medical Sciences Act, 1956 - Sections 13, 23 and 24; General Clauses Act - Sections 3(58); University Grants Commission Act, 1956 - Sections 22

Reported in : AIR2001SC3303; 93(2001)DLT291(SC); JT2001(7)SC342; 2001(5)SCALE573; (2001)8SCC61; 2001(4)SCT336(SC); 2001(3)SLJ468(SC)

[for brevity 'AIIMS'] was a member of the Dental Council ['Council' for brevity] under Section 3(d) of the Dentists Act, 1948, ['the Act' for brevity] for the period between 23.2.1991 to 22.3.1996. He having retired from the services of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 01 2015

Dhebarbhai Savjibhai Kapuriya Vs. Maharaja Krishnakumarsinhji Bhavnaga ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : May-01-2015

Subject : Education

a member of the Dental Faculty. It was further contended that the provision of Section 3(d) of the Dentists Act, 1948, clearly provide that only in case if there is no Dental Faculty, member of two faculties can be … Oral Order (1) By way of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for an appropriate writ of mandamus or any other

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 04 2001

Saroj Iyer and anr. Vs. Maharashtra Medical of Indian Medicine, Bombay ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-04-2001

Subject : Media and CommunicationConstitution

Acts : Maharashtra Medical Council Act, 1965 - Sections 22; Maharashtra Medical Council Rules, 1967 - Rules 67 to 75

Reported in : AIR2002Bom97; 2002(3)BomCR416; (2002)1BOMLR504; 2002(1)MhLj737

Council of India constituted under the Press Council Act, 1965, the Dental Council of India constituted under the Dentists Act, 1948 and before all these statutory bodies the disciplinary proceedings are held in camera and are not open to … the members of the public in general and the petitioners in particular from attending the enquiries held under Section 22 of the Maharashtra Medical Council Act, 1965. 2. For the sake of convenience we intend to refer to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 01 2003

Indian Dental Association, by Its Secretary and anr. Vs. Union of Indi ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Oct-01-2003

Subject : Constitution

Acts : The University Grants Commission Act, 1956 - Sections 3 and 3D; Dentists Act, 1948 - Sections 3

Reported in : ILR2003KAR4564; 2004(1)KarLJ282

Grants Commission Act, 1956 falls within the phrase 'University established by law' used in Section 3(d) of the Dentists Act, 1948'.2. The brief facts leading to these Writ Petitions are as under:In exercise of the powers conferred under Section … and not for any other purpose. In this regard it is also necessary to have a look at Section 22 of the UGC Act which reads as under:'22. Right to confer degrees: (1) The right of conferring or

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 27 2017

Dr. Raj Arya vs.govt.of Nct of Delhi and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-27-2017

Subject : Election

present case the appellant had made a representation to the Delhi Government as per section 26 of the Dentists Act, 1948 which was accordingly dealt with vide order dated 15.05.2015.11. According to the learned counsel for the appellant the … register;” “21. Except where a Joint 1 [State]. Council is constituted in accordance with an agreement made under section 22, the 1 [State]. Government shall constitute a 1 [State]. Council consisting of the following members, namely: - (a)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 22 2006

Nageshwar Basantram Dubey Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-22-2006

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Indian Medical Central Council Act, 1970 - Sections 2, 2(1), 2(2) , 3, 3(1), 14(1), 14(2), 15, 16, 17,  17(1), 17(2), 17(3), 17(4), 22 and 23 to 31; Maharashtra Medical Practitioners Act, 1951 - Sections 2(2), 17, 17(2), 17(3), 17(3A), 18, 25, 28, 32(2), 33, 33(1), 33(2), 35(1), 36, 36(1), 36(2) and 37; Maharashtra Medical Practitioners (Amendment) Act, 1979; Maharashtra Medical Practitioners (Amendment) Act, 2005; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 45; Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 - Sections 2; Hindi Sahitya Sammelan Act, 1962; Bombay Medical Act, 1912; Bombay Medical Practitioners Act, 1938; Bombay Homeopathic Act, 1951; Bombay Medical Act, 1952; Dentists Act, 1948; Bombay Nurses, Midwifes and Health Visitors Act, 1954; Maharashtra Medical Practitioners Act, 1961; Const

Reported in : 2007(2)ALLMR612; 2007(3)MhLj275

personal gain furnishes medical treatment or does domestic administration of family remedies; or (v) being registered under the Dentists Act, 1948, limits his practice to the art of dentistry; or(vi) being a nurse, midwife or health visitor registered or … who acts in contravention of Section 2 Sub-section (2) shall be punished with imprisonment or fine or both.9. Section 22 of the Central Act provides that Central Council may prescribe minimum standard of education in Indian Medicines required

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 21 2001

Jimmy Abraham Thomas and ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-21-2001

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 3; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 226 and 266; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 1, Rule 8; Dentists Act, 1948 - Sections 10A and 10B(3); Indian Medical Councils Act, 1956 - Sections 10A, 10A(1), 10A(2), 10A(7), 10B, 10B(1), 10C, 20 and 33; Indian Medicine Central Council Act, 1970 - Sections 3; Medical Council (Amendment) Act, 1993

Reported in : 2002(1)ALLMR1; 2002(3)BomCR219

10B and 10C with effect from 1st June, 1992 in the Indian Medical Council Act. 1956 and the Dentists Act, 1948. and they provided for the necessary statutory mechanism. In J. P. Unni Krishnan v. State of Andhra Pradesh, … Petitioners enclosed copies of these news reports to the present petition. They prayed for revaluation of the Biology section of the C.E.T. They also prayed for a stay on the selection of the candidates pending the hearing … Gokhale, J.1. All the writ petitions in Group (A) above invoking Article 226 of the Constitution of India raise common questions with respect to the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 02 2000

R.K. Bali (Dr.) Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-02-2000

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; The Dental Council Act, 1948 - Sections 3, 6 and 7

Reported in : 2000IIAD(Delhi)673

order dated 6.11.1997. The fourth respondent challenged the election before the Central Government under Section 5 of the Dentists Act, 1948.2. The matter was argued at length by the learned counsel for the parties. The facts necessary for the … there was a tie between the petitioner Dr. R.K. Bali and Dr. N. Sridhar Shetty, each having secured 22 votes. The 4th respondent Dr. L.K. Gandhi secured 18 votes. On 13.11.1995 the 4th respondent Dr. L.K. Gandhi

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 28 2017

Dr Dibyendu Mazumder Vs. Union of India Through Secretary Ministry of ...

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Apr-28-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

the meantime, the University issued Notification dated 17.10.2013 for election under sub­section (d) to section 3 of the Dentists Act, 1948. The petitioner was elected a member under section 3(d) representing Nilamber Pitamber University in Dental Council of India … be necessary in respect of any of the matters specified in any Statutes made under clause (d) of Section 22 or under Section 34. Section 57(A) (1) Appointment of teacher of affiliated Colleges not maintained by the State

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 31 1996

Lovely Joseph Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Oct-31-1996

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15(4) and 16; Karnataka Educational Institutions (Prohibition of Capitation Fee) Act, 1984 - Sections 14; Dentists Act, 1948 - Sections 10C and 20; Karnataka Selection of Candidates for Admission to Engineering and Medical and Dental Courses Rules, 1993; Admission Rules, Rules 2, 3, 6 and 12

Reported in : AIR1997Kant269; ILR1997KAR424

Chemistry and Biology and she also acquired the B.Sc. Degree.3. The regulations framed under S. 20 of the Dentist Act, 1948, provides for the following eligibility criteria for admission to the BDS course:' a) The candidate has … and Biology and she also acquired the B.Sc. Degree.3. The regulations framed under S. 20 of the Dentist Act, 1948, provides for the following eligibility criteria for admission to the BDS course:' a) The candidate has completed the … in question, has been disapproved by the Central Government in terms of Section 10C and 10A of the Dentist Act, 1948. The Central Government while … found by me in my order dated 1-10-1996 passed in W.P. No. 22316 of 1996 (Citizen of India v. State of Karnataka), Sri Venkateshwara Dental

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial