Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: dentists act 1948 section 1 · Page 1 of about 145 results (0.023 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 02 2000

R.K. Bali (Dr.) Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-02-2000

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; The Dental Council Act, 1948 - Sections 3, 6 and 7

Reported in : 2000IIAD(Delhi)673

order dated 6.11.1997. The fourth respondent challenged the election before the Central Government under Section 5 of the Dentists Act, 1948.2. The matter was argued at length by the learned counsel for the parties. The facts necessary for the … 6.11.1997. The fourth respondent challenged the election before the Central Government under Section 5 of the Dentists Act, 1948.2. The matter was argued at length by the learned counsel for the parties. The facts necessary for the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 01 2003

Indian Dental Association, by Its Secretary and anr. Vs. Union of Indi ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Oct-01-2003

Subject : Constitution

Acts : The University Grants Commission Act, 1956 - Sections 3 and 3D; Dentists Act, 1948 - Sections 3

Reported in : ILR2003KAR4564; 2004(1)KarLJ282

Grants Commission Act, 1956 falls within the phrase 'University established by law' used in Section 3(d) of the Dentists Act, 1948'.2. The brief facts leading to these Writ Petitions are as under:In exercise of the powers conferred under Section … consideration in these Writ Petitions is:'Whether a 'deemed University' under Section 3 of the University Grants Commission Act, 1956 falls within the phrase 'University established by law' used in Section 3(d) of the Dentists Act, 1948'.2. The

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 21 1994

Dr. Anil Kohli Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-21-1994

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Dentist Act, 1948 - Sections 3, 4 and 6(1); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 226 and 310; Dental Council (Election) Regulations, 1952; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 16

Reported in : 1994IAD(Delhi)450; AIR1994Delhi279; 53(1994)DLT702; 1994(28)DRJ373

by which the petitioner stood removed from the membership of the Dental Council of India constituted under the Dentists Act, 1948 (the Act for short). The petitioner had earlier been nominated to the Council by Notification No. V.12013/5/88-PMS dated … Family Welfare(Deptt. of Health)Nirman Bhavan,New Delhi, the 24th October, 1989.NOTIFICATIONS.O. ----- Whereas in pursuance of clause (f) of Section 3 of the Dentists Act, 1948 (16 of 1948), the following persons have been nominated by the Central … 226 of the Constitution challenging the Notification No. V.120B/5/88-PMS date 9 January, 1990 issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 30 1995

Dr. P.V. Prasannan, Dentist Vs. Dental Council of India, New Delhi and ...

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Mar-30-1995

Subject : Civil

Acts : Dentists Act, 1948 - Sections 33(1) and 46A

Reported in : AIR1995Ker380

registered as Dentists in Part B of the Madhya Pradesh State Dental Council under the provisions of the Dentists Act, 1948. Ext. P1 in each O.P. is the certificate of registration granted by the Madhya Pradesh State Dental Council. … for transfer of their registration from the Madhya Pradesh State Dentist Register to Kerala State Dentist Register under Section 46A of the Dentists Act, 1948 (for short, the Act). After conducting an enquiry the first respondent, by … Madhya Pradesh State Dental Council under the provisions of the Dentists Act, 1948. Ext. P1 in each O.P. is the certificate of registration granted by

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 27 2017

Dr. Raj Arya vs.govt.of Nct of Delhi and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-27-2017

Subject : Election

present case the appellant had made a representation to the Delhi Government as per section 26 of the Dentists Act, 1948 which was accordingly dealt with vide order dated 15.05.2015.11. According to the learned counsel for the appellant the … the Delhi Dental Council was in complete violation of the prescribed norms as provided under the Dentist Act, 1948. The learned Single Judge dismissed the WP(C) No.60vide order dated 04.04.2016 and observed that there was no cause

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 05 2009

Prof. Dr. J.R. Sabharwal, Vice Principal Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-05-2009

Subject : Service

Acts : Dentists Act, 1948 - Sections 3 and 5; Dental Council (Election) Regulations, 1952 - Regulation 20; Dental College of India Regulations, 1983; BDS Course Regulations, 1983

Reported in : 160(2009)DLT344

Bhat, J.1. The writ petitioner challenges an order dated 18.03.2009 whereby a reference under Section 5 of the Dentists Act, 1948 and Regulation 20 of the Dental Council (Election) Regulations, 1952 questioning the election process which commenced on 25.08.2008,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 11 2001

Ganesh Das Majumdar Vs. State and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Dec-11-2001

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Dentists Act, 1948 - Sections 10(5), 21, 32, 32(1), (2), (3), (4), (5), (6), 33 and 34; General Clause Act, 1897 - Sections 21; Constitition of India - Articles 21 and 226; Dentists (Amendment) Act, 1955

Reported in : 2001(4)WLC486

to the reply, whereby, the State Govt., in exercise of its powers, conferred Under Section 32 of the Dentists Act, 1948 (hereinafter referred as 'the Act of 1948'), constituted Registration Tribunal, consisting of the persons, named therein, for entertaining … writ petitions are posted today, for admission but with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, 1 propose to decide these writ petitions on merit, at admission stage.(2). In the aforesaid writ petitions, common questions

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 06 1996

Monika Pahwa Vs. Director of Medical Education

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-06-1996

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Karnataka State Universities Act, 1976 - Sections 53(10); ;Dentists Act, 1948 - Sections 10A(1); Dentists (Amendment) Act, 1993

Reported in : ILR1996KAR845; 1996(6)KarLJ365

College as per the BDS Regulations framed by the Dental Council of India under Section 20 of the Dentists Act, 1948. It means, the respondent College cannot in any circumstance admit more than 60 students in the first year … ORDERBharuka, J.1. These Writ Petitions have been filed by 15 students who claim to have been admitted by the respondent Bangalore Institute of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Bangalore

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 31 1996

Lovely Joseph Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Oct-31-1996

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15(4) and 16; Karnataka Educational Institutions (Prohibition of Capitation Fee) Act, 1984 - Sections 14; Dentists Act, 1948 - Sections 10C and 20; Karnataka Selection of Candidates for Admission to Engineering and Medical and Dental Courses Rules, 1993; Admission Rules, Rules 2, 3, 6 and 12

Reported in : AIR1997Kant269; ILR1997KAR424

Chemistry and Biology and she also acquired the B.Sc. Degree.3. The regulations framed under S. 20 of the Dentist Act, 1948, provides for the following eligibility criteria for admission to the BDS course:' a) The candidate has … and Biology and she also acquired the B.Sc. Degree.3. The regulations framed under S. 20 of the Dentist Act, 1948, provides for the following eligibility criteria for admission to the BDS course:' a) The candidate has completed the … in question, has been disapproved by the Central Government in terms of Section 10C and 10A of the Dentist Act, 1948. The Central Government while … which he had given in the 4th respondent-college during the academic year 1994-95 by the Director of Medical Education under B.Sc. quota.2. According to the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 21 2001

Jimmy Abraham Thomas and ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-21-2001

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 3; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 226 and 266; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 1, Rule 8; Dentists Act, 1948 - Sections 10A and 10B(3); Indian Medical Councils Act, 1956 - Sections 10A, 10A(1), 10A(2), 10A(7), 10B, 10B(1), 10C, 20 and 33; Indian Medicine Central Council Act, 1970 - Sections 3; Medical Council (Amendment) Act, 1993

Reported in : 2002(1)ALLMR1; 2002(3)BomCR219

10B and 10C with effect from 1st June, 1992 in the Indian Medical Council Act. 1956 and the Dentists Act, 1948. and they provided for the necessary statutory mechanism. In J. P. Unni Krishnan v. State of Andhra Pradesh, … Petitioners enclosed copies of these news reports to the present petition. They prayed for revaluation of the Biology section of the C.E.T. They also prayed for a stay on the selection of the candidates pending the hearing … and validity of the results of this examination which were declared on 17th May, 2001 and the consequent admissions to various medical courses. These petitions

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial