Advanced Search Results

Chirayinkeezhu A. Babu Vs. Delimitation Commission

Court : Kerala

Subject : Election

Acts : Delimitation Act, 2002 - Sections 3, 4(2), 4(5), 7(3), 8, 8(1), 9, 9(1), 9(2), 10(1), 10(2), 10(6), 10A, 10A(1), 10B, 11 and 11(1); ;Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Section 8; ;Delimitation Commission Act, 1962; ;Representation of the People Act, 1950 - Section 8 and 8(1); ;Delimitation of Parliamentary and Assembly Constituencies Order, 2008; ;Delimitation of Parliamentary and Assembly Constituencies Order, 1976; ;Constitution of India - Articles 82, 170(3), 226, 327, 328, 329, 330 and 332; ;Kerala State and Subordinate Services Rules - Rule 3; ;Delimitation (Amendment) Ordinances, 2008; ;Delimitation (Amendment) Act, 2008

Reported in : 2010(2)KLJ957

Delimitation Commission for the purpose of completing the whole exercise. Annexure B is the photo copy of the Delimitation (Amendment) Ordinances, 2008 and Annexure C is the photo copy of the Presidential Order issued under Articles 82 and … raised in this Writ Petition. The Delimitation Commission is constituted under Section 3 of the Act and under Section 4(2), the Commission shall readjust the division of each State into territorial constituencies for the purpose of elections to

Public Interest Committee For Scheduling Specific Areas An Unregistere ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

the Delimitation Commission to deviate from the “generalized procedure as contained in the Delimitation Act, 2002 read with Delimitation (Amendment) Act 2003” for certain states, there is no provision which allows a similar deviation from the generic provisions of … Respondents ................................................................... 24 Delimitation Notification of 2006 and the Delimitation Order of 2008 ........................ 26 Issues .................................................................................................................................. 29 Analysis: ............................................................................................................................. 30 Whether Delimitation Commission can … census figures as ascertained at the census held in the year 1971 and subject to the provisions of section 4, the number of seats in the House of the People to be allocated to each State and determine

Haji Abdul Gani Khan Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

the ground that after the Delimitation of Parliamentary and Assembly Constituencies Order, 2008 (for short “the Delimitation Order of 2008”) was issued by the Election … is to the legality and validity of the action of constituting a Delimitation Commission for the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir under provisions of … of the first census taken after the year 2000 were available. It was modified by the Constitution (84th Amendment Act, 2001) by substituting the year 2026 for the year 2000. The Government cannot undermine the objects and reasons … in the Legislative Assembly of Union Territory of J & K shall be increased from 107 to 114. Sub-Section (4) of Section 14 provides that 24 seats in the Legislative Assembly of the Union territory of J &

Present: Mr. Anupam Gupta Senior Advocate with Vs. State of Punjab and ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Land Acquisition

reliance has been placed upon decisions of the Supreme Court in Lakshmi Charan Sen's case (supra).Meghraj Kothari v. Delimitation Commission and otheRs.AIR 196.Supreme Court 669 and Jyoti Basu and others v. Debi Ghosal and otheRs.(1982) 1 Supreme … seeking; a declaration that the provisions of Sections 10 and 10-A of the Punjab Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 (Amendment Act No.4 of 2012) [hereinafter referred to as the “Amendment Act”.].is ultra vires to the Constitution of India and … member single constituency. However, this system was highlighted in CWP No.10804 of 2008 and vide order dated 07.01.2009, this matter was referred to the Full … this petition in public interest seeking; a declaration that the provisions of Sections 10 and 10-A of the Punjab Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 (Amendment Act

Vikramsing S/O Jalamsing Walvi and Uttam S/O Nimbha Deshmukh Vs. the S ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Election

Acts : Panchayats (Extension to the Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996 - Sections 3 and 4; Constitution of India (Seventy Third) (Amendment) Act, 1992; Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961 - Sections 2(3), 2(26A), 4, 5, 6, 12, 12(2), 42, 42(4), 56, 58, 58(1B), 67 and 67(5); Maharashttra Scheduled Areas Order, 1985; Constitution of India - Articles 40, 226, 243, 243B, 243D, 243D(1), 243D(4), 243K, 243K(1), 243M, 243M(4), 243O, 244, 244(1), 254(1), 329 and 368; Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis (Manner and rotation of Reservation of Seats) Rules, 1996 - Rules 3, 4, 4(2), 7, 8, 8(2) and 14(2); Maharashtra Zilla Parishad and Panchayat Samiti (Extension to the Scheduled Areas and Amendment) Ordinance, 1997; Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis (Amendm

Reported in : 2008(6)ALLMR497; 2009(2)BomCR330

Matched in: Citation 2008(6)ALLMR497; 2009(2)BomCR330

Smt. Pooja Rajput Vs. State of Uttarakhand and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : AIR2010Utr24

243-O of the Constitution of IndiaNotwithstanding anything in this Constitution,:(a) the validity of any law relating to the delimitation of constituencies or the allotment of seats to such constituencies, made or purporting to be made under Article … the Panchayats are elevated to the Constitutional status by Part IX of the Constitution introduced by Constitution (73rd Amendment) Act. There is no ambiguity either under Article 243-O(b) of the Constitution of India or under Section 12-C of … Shri P. C. Bisht, Brief Holder for the State/respondent Nos. 1 to 4 and 6, Shri S. K. Mandal, Advocate for respondent No. 5 and

Stoneridge Investment Partners, Llc Vs. Scientific-atlanta, Inc

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

in accord with the nature of the cause of action at issue here, we give weight to Congress’ amendment to the Act restoring aiding and abetting liability in certain cases but not others. The amendment, in our … for the eighth circuit No. 06-43. Argued October 9, 2007-Decided January 15, 2008 Alleging losses after purchasing Charter Communications, Inc., common stock, petitioner filed suit … §10(b) liability did not extend to aiders and abettors. The Court found the scope of §10(b) to be delimited by the text, which makes no mention of aiding and abetting liability. 511 U. S., at 177. The … 372 (CA5 2007). We granted certiorari. 549 U. S. ___ (2007). II Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act makes it “unlawful for any person, … Y. v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co. , 404 U. S. 6 , 13, n. 9, does

Hispreacheringson Shylla Vs. Khasi Hills Autonomous District Council a ...

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Service

following matters:(a) the composition of the District Councils and Regional Councils and the allocation of seats therein;(b) the delimitation of territorial constituencies for the purpose of elections to those Councils;(c) the qualifications for voting at such elections … is conspicuous by its absence, which incidentally was there prior to the amendment effected in the Assam Reorganization (Meghalaya) Act, 1969. On the contrary, paragraph … independent Member and a nominated Member with which we are not currently concerned, are accordingly not reproduced. Then, Section 4 deals with exemption during split while Section 5 pertains to exemption during merger. Section 6 relates to exemption

Pragyasingh Chandrapalsingh Thakur and Another Vs. State of Maharashtr ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

was whether clause (bb) of Section 20(4) of Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 introduced by an Amendment Act governing Section 167(2) of the Cr. P.C. in relation to TADA matters was in the realm of procedural … S.C. Dharmadhikari, J. 1 These Writ Petitions raise the issue of constitutional validity of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 (Act 34 of 2008) (for short “NIA Act”). 2 Hence, RULE. The Respondents waive service. By consent, Rule … and are of an enabling character. They are designed to define and delimit the respective areas of legislative competence of the Union and State Legislatures.

State of Kerala and anr. Vs. Peoples Union for Civil Liberties, Kerala ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Kerala Scheduled Tribes (Restriction on Transfer of Lands and Restoration of Alienated Lands) Act, 1975 - Sections 1(3), 2, 4, 5, 5(1), 5(2), 6, 8, 10, 11, 12, 14, 21, 22 and 80P(2); Constitutional 40th (Amendment) Act; Kerala Scheduled Tribe (Restriction on Transfer of Lands and Restoration of Alienated Lands) (Amendment) Act, 1996; Contempt of Courts Act, 1971; Kerala Restriction on Transfer by and Restoration of Lands to the Scheduled Tribes Act, 1999 - Sections 2, 5, 5(1), 5(2), 6, 19, 22 and 22(2); Kerala Government Land Assignment Act, 1960 - Sections 6; Transfer of Property Act, 1882; Life Insurance Corporation (Modification of Settlement) Act, 1976; General Clauses Act - Sections 6, 6(1), 7; Scheduled Area Regulation Act; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 65; Speci

Reported in : JT2009(9)SC573; 2009(10)SCALE25; (2009)8SCC46

included in the Ninth Schedule of the Constitution of India, being item No. 150, by the Constitutional 40th Amendment Act. It was published in the Kerala Gazette Extraordinary on 14th November, 1975. However, only on 24th January, 1986 … the usufructs available or anticipated to be available to any land during specified term for a specified price.42. Section 4 imposes restrictions on transfer by providing a non obstante clause in terms whereof after the commencement of the … agricultural land' in Entry 7 in List III have the effect of delimiting the legislative power of the Union to make a law with respect