Advanced Search Results

Chirayinkeezhu A. Babu Vs. Delimitation Commission

Court : Kerala

Subject : Election

Acts : Delimitation Act, 2002 - Sections 3, 4(2), 4(5), 7(3), 8, 8(1), 9, 9(1), 9(2), 10(1), 10(2), 10(6), 10A, 10A(1), 10B, 11 and 11(1); ;Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Section 8; ;Delimitation Commission Act, 1962; ;Representation of the People Act, 1950 - Section 8 and 8(1); ;Delimitation of Parliamentary and Assembly Constituencies Order, 2008; ;Delimitation of Parliamentary and Assembly Constituencies Order, 1976; ;Constitution of India - Articles 82, 170(3), 226, 327, 328, 329, 330 and 332; ;Kerala State and Subordinate Services Rules - Rule 3; ;Delimitation (Amendment) Ordinances, 2008; ;Delimitation (Amendment) Act, 2008

Reported in : 2010(2)KLJ957

Delimitation Commission for the purpose of completing the whole exercise. Annexure B is the photo copy of the Delimitation (Amendment) Ordinances, 2008 and Annexure C is the photo copy of the Presidential Order issued under Articles 82 and … be relevant for considering the legal issues raised in this Writ Petition. The Delimitation Commission is constituted under Section 3 of the Act and under Section 4(2), the Commission shall readjust the division of each State into territorial

Public Interest Committee For Scheduling Specific Areas An Unregistere ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

the Delimitation Commission to deviate from the “generalized procedure as contained in the Delimitation Act, 2002 read with Delimitation (Amendment) Act 2003” for certain states, there is no provision which allows a similar deviation from the generic provisions of … Respondents ................................................................... 24 Delimitation Notification of 2006 and the Delimitation Order of 2008 ........................ 26 Issues .................................................................................................................................. 29 Analysis: ............................................................................................................................. 30 Whether Delimitation Commission can … stand for election to the Legislative Assembly of the State of Sikkim;” Representation of Peoples Act, 1950 11. Section 3 of the Representation of the People Act 1950 provides for the allocation of seats to the States in

Haji Abdul Gani Khan Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

the ground that after the Delimitation of Parliamentary and Assembly Constituencies Order, 2008 (for short “the Delimitation Order of 2008”) was issued by the Election … newly formed Union Territory of J&K. On 6th March 2020, the Central Government constituted a Delimitation Commission under Section 3 of the Delimitation Act, 2002 for the purpose of delimitation of Assembly and Parliamentary Constituencies in the Union … of the first census taken after the year 2000 were available. It was modified by the Constitution (84th Amendment Act, 2001) by substituting the year 2026 for the year 2000. The Government cannot undermine the objects and reasons

Smt. Pooja Rajput Vs. State of Uttarakhand and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : AIR2010Utr24

243-O of the Constitution of IndiaNotwithstanding anything in this Constitution,:(a) the validity of any law relating to the delimitation of constituencies or the allotment of seats to such constituencies, made or purporting to be made under Article … the Panchayats are elevated to the Constitutional status by Part IX of the Constitution introduced by Constitution (73rd Amendment) Act. There is no ambiguity either under Article 243-O(b) of the Constitution of India or under Section 12-C of … No. 1541/2008 (M/S) challenging the petitioner's nomination. The same was dismissed on 3-9-2008 with an observation that petitioner therein may avail the remedy of filing

Hispreacheringson Shylla Vs. Khasi Hills Autonomous District Council a ...

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Service

following matters:(a) the composition of the District Councils and Regional Councils and the allocation of seats therein;(b) the delimitation of territorial constituencies for the purpose of elections to those Councils;(c) the qualifications for voting at such elections … is conspicuous by its absence, which incidentally was there prior to the amendment effected in the Assam Reorganization (Meghalaya) Act, 1969. On the contrary, paragraph … Mr. H.L. Massar and Mr. Lambor Malngiang, separately submitted and moved the Chairman of the District Council under Section 3 of the Act for disqualifying the petitioner as Member of the District Council on the ground that he

State Election Commission Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Subject : Election

Reported in : 106(2008)CLT805

Matched in: Citation 106(2008)CLT805

Present: Mr. Anupam Gupta Senior Advocate with Vs. State of Punjab and ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Land Acquisition

has also referred to the provisions of the De-limiation Act, 1972 and the De-limitation Act, 2002. As per Section 3 of the De-limitation Act, 2002, a three members Commission is formed which includes a sitting or retired Judge … of the Supreme Court in Lakshmi Charan Sen's case (supra).Meghraj Kothari v. Delimitation Commission and otheRs.AIR 196.Supreme Court 669 and Jyoti Basu and others v. … seeking; a declaration that the provisions of Sections 10 and 10-A of the Punjab Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 (Amendment Act No.4 of 2012) [hereinafter referred to as the “Amendment Act”.].is ultra vires to the Constitution of India and … member single constituency. However, this system was highlighted in CWP No.10804 of 2008 and vide order dated 07.01.2009, this matter was referred to the Full

K. T. Eldhose, vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Joseph, 2005 (4) KLT 599, Sathyan V.V. v. Election Commission of India, 2008 (4) KHC 245, Chirayinkeezhu A. Babu v. Delimitation Commission, 2010 (2) KLT … court as also of this court, in support of that contention. The decisions cited are Meghraj Kothari v. Delimitation Commission and others, AIR 1967 SC 669, N.P. Ponnuswamy v. The Returning Officer, Namakkal Constituency, AIR 1952 SC … MUNICIPAL OFFICE, PALA, PIN-686575. (REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY). 3 REGIONAL JOINT DIRECTOR OF URBAN AFFAIRS, RSNRA-29, Q.A.C.ROAD, … this Court in case of SURENDRABABU vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA AND OTHERS, while dealing with the challenge to amendments made to the Karnataka Municipal Corporation Act, 1976 at para 9 states that the bar under Article 243ZG … the Election Commission.6. Placing reliance on Articles 243D and 243T ofthe Constitution, Section 7 of the Kerala Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 and Section 6 of

Baiju Sebastian vs State Election Commission

Court : Kerala

Joseph, 2005 (4) KLT 599, Sathyan V.V. v. Election Commission of India, 2008 (4) KHC 245, Chirayinkeezhu A. Babu v. Delimitation Commission, 2010 (2) KLT … court as also of this court, in support of that contention. The decisions cited are Meghraj Kothari v. Delimitation Commission and others, AIR 1967 SC 669, N.P. Ponnuswamy v. The Returning Officer, Namakkal Constituency, AIR 1952 SC … MUNICIPAL OFFICE, PALA, PIN-686575. (REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY). 3 REGIONAL JOINT DIRECTOR OF URBAN AFFAIRS, RSNRA-29, Q.A.C.ROAD, … this Court in case of SURENDRABABU vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA AND OTHERS, while dealing with the challenge to amendments made to the Karnataka Municipal Corporation Act, 1976 at para 9 states that the bar under Article 243ZG … the Election Commission.6. Placing reliance on Articles 243D and 243T ofthe Constitution, Section 7 of the Kerala Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 and Section 6 of

R (on the Application of Gc) (Fc) (Appellant) Vs. the Commissioner of ...

Court : UK Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Queen's Speech on 25 May 2010 that it intended to seek amendment of the 2010 Act by bringing forward legislative proposals (in Chapter 1 … cannot be regarded as necessary in a democratic society." On 16 December 2008, the Secretary of the State for the Home Department announced the Government's … with the judgment of Lord Dyson. I have, however, a little that I would add to his reasoning. Section 3 of the Human Rights Act 1998 ("the HRA") requires this Court, in so far as it is possible … section 64(1A) the police were free to do what they liked and that the subsection contains nothing to delimit the exercise of their discretion. I agree that, if this is the effect of Mr Fordham's argument, it