Advanced Search Results

Chirayinkeezhu A. Babu Vs. Delimitation Commission

Court : Kerala

Subject : Election

Acts : Delimitation Act, 2002 - Sections 3, 4(2), 4(5), 7(3), 8, 8(1), 9, 9(1), 9(2), 10(1), 10(2), 10(6), 10A, 10A(1), 10B, 11 and 11(1); ;Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Section 8; ;Delimitation Commission Act, 1962; ;Representation of the People Act, 1950 - Section 8 and 8(1); ;Delimitation of Parliamentary and Assembly Constituencies Order, 2008; ;Delimitation of Parliamentary and Assembly Constituencies Order, 1976; ;Constitution of India - Articles 82, 170(3), 226, 327, 328, 329, 330 and 332; ;Kerala State and Subordinate Services Rules - Rule 3; ;Delimitation (Amendment) Ordinances, 2008; ;Delimitation (Amendment) Act, 2008

Reported in : 2010(2)KLJ957

Delimitation Commission for the purpose of completing the whole exercise. Annexure B is the photo copy of the Delimitation (Amendment) Ordinances, 2008 and Annexure C is the photo copy of the Presidential Order issued under Articles 82 and … a corrigendum notification, after the publication of the order delimiting the Constituencies under Section 10(1) of the Delimitation Act (for short 'the Act'). It is also contended that the Statute does not confer any such power and … the formation of the Delimitation Commission in terms of the Delimitation Act, 2002, Ext.P2, a proposal for delimitation of the Parliamentary and Assembly Constituencies in

Public Interest Committee For Scheduling Specific Areas An Unregistere ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

the Delimitation Commission to deviate from the “generalized procedure as contained in the Delimitation Act, 2002 read with Delimitation (Amendment) Act 2003” for certain states, there is no provision which allows a similar deviation from the generic provisions of … 22 Submissions on behalf of the Respondents ................................................................... 24 Delimitation Notification of 2006 and the Delimitation Order of 2008 ........................ 26 Issues .................................................................................................................................. 29 Analysis: ............................................................................................................................. 30 Whether Delimitation Commission can amend the 2006 Notification under the … Scope of Powers of the Election Commission under RP Act. ............................... 34 Section 9, RP Act and Section 11, Delimitation Act ............................................... 38 Proportional Representation … 1 2023 INSC1086Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Writ Petition

Smt. Pooja Rajput Vs. State of Uttarakhand and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : AIR2010Utr24

243-O of the Constitution of IndiaNotwithstanding anything in this Constitution,:(a) the validity of any law relating to the delimitation of constituencies or the allotment of seats to such constituencies, made or purporting to be made under Article … the Panchayats are elevated to the Constitutional status by Part IX of the Constitution introduced by Constitution (73rd Amendment) Act. There is no ambiguity either under Article 243-O(b) of the Constitution of India or under Section 12-C of … U.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 adapted by Uttaranchal Adaptation and Modification Order, 2001 (hereinafter referred to as 'Panchayat Raj Act') ultra vires to Article 243(O)

Haji Abdul Gani Khan Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

the ground that after the Delimitation of Parliamentary and Assembly Constituencies Order, 2008 (for short “the Delimitation Order of 2008”) was issued by the Election … 5th May 2022, a notification has been published by the Delimitation Commission in the exercise of powers under sub-Section (2) of Section 4 and sub-Section (2) of Section 9 of the Delimitation Act, 2002 containing the order of … of the first census taken after the year 2000 were available. It was modified by the Constitution (84th Amendment Act, 2001) by substituting the year 2026 for the year 2000. The Government cannot undermine the objects and reasons

Laxmi Kant Bajpai Vs. Hazi Yaqoob and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Election

Acts : Representation of People Act, 1951 - Sections 2(1), 3, 7(3), 8, 9, 10, 11, 11B, 11C, 16, 19, 21, 22, 23, 23(3), 24, 27(5), 62(2) to (5), 83(1), 100 and 100(1); Delimitation Act, 1972 - Sections 10(1) and 11(1); Representation of People Act, 1950 - Sections 2, 9(1), 14 to 24 and 30; Delimitation Act, 2002 - Sections 11; Uttar Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1994; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 7, Rule 11; Registration of Electors Rules, 1960 - Rules 18, 20, 21A, 22, 24 and 321; Constitution of India - Articles 173, 226, 324, 325, 327, 328 and 329

Reported in : JT2009(15)SC315; 2009(14)SCALE447; 2010(1)LC149(SC)

Allahabad High Court by its order dated 12.5.2008.2. We may now briefly state the material facts : The Delimitation Commission of India under Section 10(1) of the Delimitation Act, 1972, had issued an order in respect of … the specified rules which reads:22. Final publication of roll.-(1) The registration officer shall thereafter-(a) prepare a list of amendments to carry out his decisions under Rules 18, 20, 321 and 21A and to correct any clerical or

State Election Commission Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Subject : Election

Reported in : 106(2008)CLT805

Matched in: Citation 106(2008)CLT805

Present: Mr. Anupam Gupta Senior Advocate with Vs. State of Punjab and ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the Supreme Court in Lakshmi Charan Sen's case (supra).Meghraj Kothari v. Delimitation Commission and otheRs.AIR 196.Supreme Court 669 and Jyoti Basu and others v. … seeking; a declaration that the provisions of Sections 10 and 10-A of the Punjab Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 (Amendment Act No.4 of 2012) [hereinafter referred to as the “Amendment Act”.].is ultra vires to the Constitution of India and … member single constituency. However, this system was highlighted in CWP No.10804 of 2008 and vide order dated 07.01.2009, this matter was referred to the Full … The Deputy Commissioner shall, within a period of ninety days from the date of his decision under sub- section (2) get published the final list of wards in the Official Gazette.” A bare perusal of Section 10 of

Union of India Vs. M/S g.s. Chatha Rice Mills

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

a part of the Act, and hence an amendment to it is an amendment to the Act; (iii) Sub-section (2) of Section 8A of the Customs Tariff Act applies the provisions of sub-sections (3) and (4) of Section … petitioner entered into a contract with its foreign supplier on 18 January 2008 for the import of 9,500 Metric Tons of crude oil. The first … of the day preceding the day on which it is promulgated: where on the other hand, a statute delimits a period marked both by a terminus a quo and a terminus ad quem, the former is to

Pragyasingh Chandrapalsingh Thakur and Another Vs. State of Maharashtr ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

S.C. Dharmadhikari, J. 1 These Writ Petitions raise the issue of constitutional validity of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 (Act 34 of 2008) (for short “NIA Act”). 2 Hence, RULE. The Respondents waive service. By consent, Rule … was whether clause (bb) of Section 20(4) of Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 introduced by an Amendment Act governing Section 167(2) of the Cr. P.C. in relation to TADA matters was in the realm of procedural … and are of an enabling character. They are designed to define and delimit the respective areas of legislative competence of the Union and State Legislatures.

Stoneridge Investment Partners, Llc Vs. Scientific-atlanta, Inc

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

in accord with the nature of the cause of action at issue here, we give weight to Congress’ amendment to the Act restoring aiding and abetting liability in certain cases but not others. The amendment, in our … for the eighth circuit No. 06-43. Argued October 9, 2007-Decided January 15, 2008 Alleging losses after purchasing Charter Communications, Inc., common stock, petitioner filed suit … Scientific-Atlanta, Inc - 06-43 (2008) SYLLABUS OCTOBER TERM, 2007 STONERIDGE INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC V.SCIENTIFIC-ATLANTA, INC. SUPREME COURT … §10(b) liability did not extend to aiders and abettors. The Court found the scope of §10(b) to be delimited by the text, which makes no mention of aiding and abetting liability. 511 U. S., at 177. The … 372 (CA5 2007). We granted certiorari. 549 U. S. ___ (2007). II Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act makes it “unlawful for any person,