Advanced Search Results

Chirayinkeezhu A. Babu Vs. Delimitation Commission

Court : Kerala

Subject : Election

Acts : Delimitation Act, 2002 - Sections 3, 4(2), 4(5), 7(3), 8, 8(1), 9, 9(1), 9(2), 10(1), 10(2), 10(6), 10A, 10A(1), 10B, 11 and 11(1); ;Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Section 8; ;Delimitation Commission Act, 1962; ;Representation of the People Act, 1950 - Section 8 and 8(1); ;Delimitation of Parliamentary and Assembly Constituencies Order, 2008; ;Delimitation of Parliamentary and Assembly Constituencies Order, 1976; ;Constitution of India - Articles 82, 170(3), 226, 327, 328, 329, 330 and 332; ;Kerala State and Subordinate Services Rules - Rule 3; ;Delimitation (Amendment) Ordinances, 2008; ;Delimitation (Amendment) Act, 2008

Reported in : 2010(2)KLJ957

Panchayat was part of Attingal Assembly Constituency.3. After the formation of the Delimitation Commission in terms of the Delimitation Act, 2002, Ext.P2, a proposal for delimitation of the Parliamentary and Assembly Constituencies in the State was published. In the … parliamentary and assembly constituencies in the States of Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Manipur and Nagaland, and the provisions of Section 10B of the said Act relating to delimitation of parliamentary and assembly constituencies in the State of Jharkhand, consolidate

Public Interest Committee For Scheduling Specific Areas An Unregistere ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

JUDGMENT Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, CJI Contents Constitutional Framework .................................................................................................. 3 Representation of Peoples Act, 1950 ............................................................................... 8 Delimitation Act, 2002 ...................................................................................................... 11 Factual Context ................................................................................................................ 14 Submissions on behalf of the Petitioners ........................................................................ 22 Submissions on behalf of … 324, Constitution of India: ...................................................................................................................... 33 Scope of Powers of the Election Commission under RP Act. ............................... 34 Section 9, RP Act and Section 11, Delimitation Act ............................................... 38 Proportional Representation ........................................................................................ 41 Conclusion ........................................................................................................................ 52 3 … Manipur and Nagaland. So, except the states mentioned in Sections 10A, and 10B, the other states’ parliamentary constituencies and the extents thereof will be determined

Stoneridge Investment Partners, Llc Vs. Scientific-atlanta, Inc

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

incorporate common-law fraud into federal law. See, e.g., SEC v. Zandford , 535 U. S. 813 , 820 (2002) (“[Section 10(b)] must not be construed so broadly as to convert every common-law fraud that happens to involve securities … §10(b) liability did not extend to aiders and abettors. The Court found the scope of §10(b) to be delimited by the text, which makes no mention of aiding and abetting liability. 511 U. S., at 177. The … filed suit against respondents and others under §10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Rule 10b-5. Acting as