Advanced Search Results
Ravindra Properties Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.
Delhi
Apr-30-1992
Property
Constitution of India - Article 226; Punjab Municipal Act, 1991 - Sections 193(2); Delhi Development Act, 1957 - Sections 11A
47(1992)DLT538; 1992(23)DRJ270
Matched in: Court Delhi
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMcd Vs. Bharat Bhushan Jain
Delhi
May-11-2015
Land Acquisition
Matched in: Court Delhi
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/s. Moolchand Kharaiti Ram Trust Vs. Union of India and Others
Delhi
May-11-2016
Land Acquisition
Matched in: Court Delhi
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
K. NooruddIn and ors. Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by Its Sec ...
Andhra Pradesh
Oct-06-2009
Property
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 3(5), 4, 4(1), 5A, 6, 6(A), 40 and 41, ;Companies Act, 1956; Delhi Development Act, 1957; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 162, 226 and 300
2009(6)ALT146
have been initiated in the absence of Master Plan or Zonal Plan, considering the relevant provisions of the Delhi Development Act 1957 the Court held that the proceedings did not get vitiate in the absence of such Plan.71. In fact … a Revenue Mandal or for location of its Headquarters keeping in view the broad guidelines laid down in Appendix I to the White Paper. It must be stated that the guidelines had no statutory force and they … filed and the material placed before this Court.8. W.P. No. 8014 of 2008 is filed praying for a writ of Mandamus declaring the action of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM.C. Mehta Vs. Union of India and ors. M/S. Delhi Development Authorit ...
Supreme Court of India
Mar-01-2001
Environment
Constitution of India - Article 14; Delhi Development Act, 1957
AIR2001SC1544; (2001)2CompLJ236(SC); JT2001(3)SC207; 2001(2)SCALE309; (2001)4SCC577; [2001]2SCR234
matter of fact, the Master Plan and the Zonal Development Plans having statutory recognition in terms of the Delhi Development Act, 1957, paragraphs and (d) as noticed above under the title Work centers industry ought to be given its full … community need and it is in this context also that Mr. Gopal Subramaniam drew our attention to the Appendix to the Zonal Development Plan pertaining to area 'G'. We are however unable to accede to such a … key questions as mentioned in the petition shall have to be considered. 2. Incidentally, some entrepreneurs also moved certain other Interlocutory Applications, we do deem
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDevender Kandhari Vs. Dda
Delhi
Nov-07-2005
CivilProperty
Delhi Development Authority (Management and Disposal of Housing Estates) Regulations 1968; Sections 57 of the Delhi Development Act 1957 - Regulations 2(13), 7 and 13
129(2006)DLT243
Matched in: Court Delhi
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskA.M. Krishnamurthy Vs. Sokab Products Private Limited by Its Executive ...
Chennai
Dec-08-1995
Property Civil
(1996)1MLJ218
reason described in that clause is, that excavating minor mineral is governed by Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 and the Rules framed thereunder Section 4 of the said Act says that 'No person shall undertake any … not sufficient for the grant of injunction.45. The Supreme Court in Shiv Kumar Chadha v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi : [1993]3SCR522 , has considered this point and held thus:A party is not entitled to an order of … these rules. The agreement shall be in the form set out in Appendix V to these rules.35. Rule 34 reads thus:34. Agreements to be registered: … ORDERS.S. Subramani, J.1. This revision is by the defendant in O.S. No. 278 of 1994, on the file of District Munsif's Court, Tindivanam.2. The suit
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAssociation of Victims of Uphaar Tragedy Vs. Union of India and ors.
Delhi
Feb-29-2000
Constitution
Constitution of India Articles 12, 32 and 226
2000IVAD(Delhi)342; 86(2000)DLT246
Matched in: Citation 2000IVAD(Delhi)342; 86(2000)DLT246
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM.C. Mehta and Another Vs. Union of India and Others
Supreme Court of India
Dec-20-1986
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 12, 15(2), 17, 21, 23, 24, 32, 32(1), 32(2) and 226
I(1987)ACC157; AIR1987SC1086; (1987)1CompLJ99(SC); JT1987(1)SC1; 1986(2)SCALE1188; (1987)1SCC395; 1986Supp(1)SCC562; [1987]1SCR819; 1987 (1) SCC 895; MANU/SC/0092/1986
also required to obtain a licence for its manufacturing activities from the Municipal authorities under the Delhi Municipal Act, 1957. It is subject to extensive environment regulation under the Water (Prevention and Control) of Pollution Act, 1974 and … interest. Special emphasis was laid by counsel for the applicants on the regulatory mechanism provided under the Industries Development and Regulation Act, 1951 where industries are included in the schedule if they vitally affect public interest. Regulatory … the private sector. Schedule B to the Resolution enumerated the industries. 22. Appendix I to the Industrial Policy Resolution, 1948 dealing with the problem of … raised involved substantial questions of law relating to the interpretation of Articles 21 and 32 of the Constitution, the case should be referred to a
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTarun Bharat Sangh Vs. U.O.i. and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Apr-08-1993
Environment
Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 - Sections 2; Rajasthan Minor Minerals Concession Rules - Rule 4(6)
JT1993(3)SC1; 1993(2)SCALE441; 1993Supp(1)SCC4; [1993]3SCR21
notifications issued under the Rajasthan Forest Act, Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 and the Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957. It is submitted that the Forest (Conservation) Act applies not only to reserve and protected forest but to … sworn to by Sri S.P. Singh, Deputy Director in the Ministry of Environment and Forest, Project Tiger, New Delhi has been filed. It is stated in the affidavit that the area declared as project tiger/tiger reserve is … may be called.7. As per the said Report, 215 mines mentioned in appendix-A to the Report fall completely within the areas declared as protected forest … notification dated January 1, 1975 issued by the Rajasthan Government under Section 29 of the Rajasthan Forest Act. This demarcation was felt necessary in view
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »