Advanced Search Results
Hakim BahauddIn Vs. Govind Singh and ors.
Allahabad
Feb-12-1946
Family Civil
AIR1948All117
remain liable on the promissory note for Rs. 15,000, but Bahauddin would assume liability for payment of the decee passed against them, that is for costs.14. Govind Singh and Hanumant Singh were, as stated, successful in their … the money would be decreed with costs.16. The Subordinate Judge considered the position of the minor in the order passed by him, observing that the minor had been benefited by the loan and was liable to pay, … high price to pay for it. But this would not be a valid reason for holding that the guardian could have successfully defended the suit. … filed on his behalf by his guardian Aman Singh, but no further action was taken by the latter and he did not attend the Court … join in it, and by Expln. 6 of Section 11 of the Code:Where persons litigate bona fide … minor, is void, and reviving the suit No. 22 of 1935, in which the decree was passed.2.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›