Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: decees and orders validating act 1936 section 2 · Page 1 of about 1 results (0.012 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 12 1946

Hakim BahauddIn Vs. Govind Singh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-12-1946

Subject : Family Civil

Reported in : AIR1948All117

remain liable on the promissory note for Rs. 15,000, but Bahauddin would assume liability for payment of the decee passed against them, that is for costs.14. Govind Singh and Hanumant Singh were, as stated, successful in their … the money would be decreed with costs.16. The Subordinate Judge considered the position of the minor in the order passed by him, observing that the minor had been benefited by the loan and was liable to pay, … high price to pay for it. But this would not be a valid reason for holding that the guardian could have successfully defended the suit. … filed on his behalf by his guardian Aman Singh, but no further action was taken by the latter and he did not attend the Court … join in it, and by Expln. 6 of Section 11 of the Code:Where persons litigate bona fide … minor, is void, and reviving the suit No. 22 of 1935, in which the decree was passed.2.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial