Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: customs tariff amendment act 2003 section xv · Page 1 of about 398 results (0.070 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 21 2005

J.K. Industries Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Apr-21-2005

Subject : Customs

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Sections 3, 8C, 9 and 9A to 9C; Customs Tariff (Amendment) Act, 1982; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 12, 15, 46, 58, 68, 72 and 129; Indian Tariff Act, 1934; Finance Act, 2003 - Sections 8B, 8C, 8(8) and 15(1); Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI), 2002; Finance Act, 2000 - Sections 9AA; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 34; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 148; Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995 - Rules 2, 3, 4, 5 to 17, 18, 19 and 20; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 136, 226, 227, 229 and 265

Reported in : 2005(103)ECC152; 2005(186)ELT3(Raj)

submitted a written application before the Designated Authority appointed by the Central Government under Rule 3 of the Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995 (hereinafter … bonded warehouse without payment of Duty, when the goods were removed. Since amendment, the rate of duty and tariff evaluation of such goods removed to … competent authority before goods are cleared from warehouse under Section 68.35. Until Section 15(1)(b) was amended vide Finance Act, 2003, the rate of duty and valuation of tariff was to be done as per the date on which … request on 17-1-2005 for supply of relevant material and a request for 15 days time to have meaningful comments and for fresh oral hearing, the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 11 2004

Sports and Leisure Apparel Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Nov-11-2004

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2005)(180)ELT429TriDel

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 01 2006

Tonira Pharma Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-01-2006

Subject : Service Tax

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 02 2012

Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-i Vs. Joint Secretary(Revisionar ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-02-2012

Subject : Excise

CVD is imposed when import is made under the Customs Act, 1962 read with Section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. 4. Section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 reads as under: “3. Levy of additional … of the duties entitled to rebate. It is submitted that the aforesaid amendment is not retrospective or clarificatory in nature and is accordingly prospective and … section 136 of the Finance Act, 2001 (14 of 2001), as amended by Section 169 of the Finance Act, 2003 (32 of 2003) and further amended by Section 3 of the Finance Act, 2004 (13 of 2004); (e) … revision application filed by the applicant, Government vide its order No.54/07-CE dated 15.3.07 F.No.195/663/06-RA held that the rebate of duty paid as CVD on the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 15 2010

C.C.E.C and St, Vishakhapatnam. Vs. Jocil Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-15-2010

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Tariff Act, 1975; Customs Act, 1962. - Section 28; Constitution Of India - Article 136

Six-digit First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 was substituted by the Eight-digit First Schedule vide the Customs Tariff (Amendment) Ordinance, 2003 and this substitution w.e.f. 01.02.2003 has statutory force. Therefore, the new Schedule would operate over and … non-edible Industrial Grade Crude Palm Stearin falling under Ch. Sub Heading No. 15 11 90 90 or as "RBD Palm Stearin" falling under Tariff Item … We also find that Rule 1 of the General Rules of Interpretation specifically state that "the titles of Sections, Chapters and sub-Chapters are provided for ease of reference only; for legal purposes, classification shall be determined according

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 16 2022

Kerala State Electricity Board Vs. Thomas Joseph Alias Thomas M. J.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-16-2022

Subject : Land Acquisition

declared that in case of unauthorised use of electricity in a higher tariff the assessment shall be made at the rate equal to twice the … Section 126 of the Act has to follow. As per Section 126(6), as it stood prior to the Amendment Act 26 of 2007, such assessment shall be made at a rate equal to 4 one and a half … However, what is relevant for our purpose is Section 50, Section 126 and Section 181 resply of the Act 2003. Section 50 is in regard to the Electricity Supply Code. The same reads thus: “50. The Electricity Supply Code.-The … a half times (two times with effect from 15.6.2007) the tariff applicable for the relevant category of … loads in the following manner: (i)[...]. (ii) In the case of LT customers other than domestic consumers, the penalty for unauthorised additional load shall be

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 18 2003

Rci Power Limited Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-18-2003

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Andhra Pradesh Electricity Reforms Act, 1998 - Sections 11, 11(1), 12, 12(3), 15(4), 26, 26(5), 54(2), 56(2) and 56(3); Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, 1998 - Sections 22, 22(1) and 29; Transfer Scheme Rules

Reported in : AIR2004AP60; 2003(3)ALD762

Matched in: Citation AIR2004AP60; 2003(3)ALD762

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 09 2005

Mrs. Madhu Garg and anr. Vs. North Delhi Power Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-09-2005

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226; Delhi Electricity Reforms Act, 2000 - Sections 28(10); Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 24, 24(1), 26, 49, 69, 79 and 79; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 2(15), 43(3) and 56; ERC Act - Sections 22(1), 26, 29, 29 (1) and (4); Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 2, 21(2), 22 and 24; State Financial Corporation Act, 1951 - Sections 29(1); Tariff Act; DERC (Performance Standards Metering and Billing) Regulations, 2002; Electricity (Supply) Annual Account Rules; Tariff Rules

Reported in : 124(2005)DLT688

Matched in: Advocate Reetesh Singh, Adv.,; Sujit K. Singh, Adv. in W.P. (C) No. 3532/2003,;

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 11 2006

Indian Aluminium Co. Limited Vs. West Bengal Electricity

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Decided on : Jul-11-2006

Subject : Electricity

Reported in : (2006)LCAPTEL791

consumer remits the charges prescribed as per Tariff Notification and as provided in Section 45 of the Electricity Act, 2003. Section 48 enables the distribution Licensee to impose certain additional conditions when open access is permitted. 49. Agreements with … to the Commission identifying and quantifying the stranding of assets arising solely out of migration of open access customer from captive route and thereafter quantum of additional surcharge payable by the open access customer shall be assessed … Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (Open Access on inter-state Transmission) Regulations, 2004 as amended by Notification, dated the 21^st February, 2005), provides that with respect to … the procedure to be followed in energy accounting by the concerned parties? 15. It is convenient to take up points A to C as they

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 02 2013

In the Matter Of: M/S. Junagadh Power Projects Private Limited, and An ...

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL Appellate Jurisdiction

Decided on : Dec-02-2013

Subject : Electricity

and jurisdiction of the State Commission to determine tariff is by virtue of the provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003 under Sections 61, 62, 64, and 86(1)(a), (b) and (e) of the Electricity Act, 2003. The power and … in the price of biomass fuel. However, the State Commission directed to amend the PPA in view of increase in tariff on account of use … is by virtue of the provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003 under Sections 61, 62, 64, and 86(1)(a), (b) and (e) of the Electricity Act, … to perform various functions and to ensure efficiency and social object of ensuring a fair deal to the customer. These objects and reasons clearly postulated the need for introduction of private sector into the field of generation … the subsequent 10 years of operation. 3.3 On 15.7.2010, Gujarat Biomass Energy Developers Association filed a Review

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial