Advanced Search Results

Tonira Pharma Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Colgate Palmolive (India) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (2003)LC56Tri(Kol.)kata

Matched in: Citation (2003)LC56Tri(Kol.)kata

Flextronics Technologies (India) Private Limited, Rep. by its Managing ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

However, Section 9-A was re-drafted and the original provision was substituted by a new Section 9-A under the Customs Tariff (Amendment) Act 14 of 1994, to take effect from 01.01.1995, coinciding with the creation of the World Trade Organisation. 21. … Tax) also issued a show cause notice proposing to compute the tax liability and also to impose penalty. 11. After the petitioner submitted a letter of objections dated 12.5.2011, the Assessing Officer passed an order dated 27.6.2011,

Commissioner of Customs (Preventive), Mumbai. Vs. M/S M. Ambalal and C ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Customs

Acts : provisions of The Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 111(d), 112, 130E(b), 11A to 11G, 14, 25(1)

other law for the time being in force provides otherwise. The rate of duty is fixed by the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. "Import" and "Imported Goods" means that if goods are brought into India, meaning thereby into the … deciding the duty payable by the respondent-firm. 5) The Customs Act, 1962 is an Act to consolidate and amend the law relating to Customs. The object of the Act is to regulate the import and export of … exempted goods. [See Union of India v. Ganesh Metal Processors Industries - 2003 (151) ELT 21]13) In short, question before us is whether goods that … adjudication, the adjudicating authority passed an order confiscating the seized diamonds under Section 111(d) of the Act. However, an option was given to the respondent … 111 or Section 113 of the Act.8) Section 11 of the Act enables the Central Government to

C.C.E.C and St, Vishakhapatnam. Vs. Jocil Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Tariff Act, 1975; Customs Act, 1962. - Section 28; Constitution Of India - Article 136

Six-digit First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 was substituted by the Eight-digit First Schedule vide the Customs Tariff (Amendment) Ordinance, 2003 and this substitution w.e.f. 01.02.2003 has statutory force. Therefore, the new Schedule would operate over and … Industrial Grade Crude Palm Stearin falling under Ch. Sub Heading No. 15 11 90 90 or as "RBD Palm Stearin" falling under Tariff Item No. … We also find that Rule 1 of the General Rules of Interpretation specifically state that "the titles of Sections, Chapters and sub-Chapters are provided for ease of reference only; for legal purposes, classification shall be determined according

Mso Alliance, Industrial Area, Delhi and Others Versus Telecom Regulat ...

Court : Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal TDSAT

Subject : MRTP

of the explanatory memorandum that it is the same increase 'allowed' (not fixed) by the Authority vide its Tariff Amendment Order dated 29.11.2005. A perusal of the explanatory memorandum to the Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable) Services (Second) Tariff … 656]; Indo-China Steam Navigation Company Ltd V. Jasjit Singh, Additional Collector of Customs, Calcutta and others [AIR 1964 Supreme Court 1140]. 22. Mr. Dwivedi also … of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997 as amended by the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (Amendment) Act, 2000 defines ' telecommunication service' as follows: “‘telecommunication service’ means service of any description (including electronic mail, voicemail, … the other by virtue of the written/oral agreement prevalent on 26th December 2003. The principle applicable in the written/oral agreement prevalent on 26th December 2003 … following the requirements of transparency as ordained in section 11 (4) of the TRAI Act. It is … this common Order. 2. The Appeals no.s 10, 11, 12 and 15 of 2007 have been filed

Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-i Vs. Joint Secretary(Revisionar ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Excise

CVD is imposed when import is made under the Customs Act, 1962 read with Section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. 4. Section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 reads as under: “3. Levy of additional … of the duties entitled to rebate. It is submitted that the aforesaid amendment is not retrospective or clarificatory in nature and is accordingly prospective and … section 136 of the Finance Act, 2001 (14 of 2001), as amended by Section 169 of the Finance Act, 2003 (32 of 2003) and further amended by Section 3 of the Finance Act, 2004 (13 of 2004); (e) … in which such goods are produced, accompanied by an invoice under rule 11 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002: Provided that the manufacturer or processor

Raymond Limited Vs. The Commissioner, Central Excise and Customs, Nash ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

national Calamity Contingent Duty paid under Section 136 of the Finance Act and additional duty paid under the Customs Tariff Act, the utilisation thereof towards payment of duty on the final product under the above referred Acts respectively … – 2002 (150) ELT 479 and Grasim Industries Ltd. Versus CCE – 2003 (54) RLT 288 (T) held that AED (TandTA) can be utilised for … Fabric, Blanket, Shawls etc. 12. By a Notification No. 27/2000-C.E.(NT) dated 31st March, 2000, the Government of India amended the Central Excise Rules, 1944 by substituting the existing Rule 57-A to 57-V by Rules 57-AA to 57-AK. … of the erstwhile Central Excise Rules 1944, as inserted by Notification No. 11/95CE( NT) dated 16th March, 1995, reads as under:- “Provided that, notwithstanding anything

Nitco Tiles Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs (import)

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

before the Deputy Commissioner that no anti dumping duty can be imposed in terms of Section 9A(1) the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 could be imposed on imports made by them from M/s.Nanhai, China, in view of the finding … dumping duty was leviable in respect of vitrified/porcelain tiles imported into India from M/s. Nanhai of China. The amendment was effective from 11-7-2003 i.e. from the date of issue of Notification No. 98/2003. On 6th March 2006 … into India from M/s. Nanhai of China. The amendment was effective from 11-7-2003 i.e. from the date of issue of Notification No. 98/2003. On 6th

In Re: Bayerische Motoren Werke

Court : Authority for Advance Rulings

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2006)(193)ELT138AAR

Gerhard Lindner and Peter Baumgartner, Advs.Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 2(9), 2(26), 2(28), 2(42), 25(1), 28J and 28H; Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Section 3; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988; Evidence Act - Section 114; General Rules - Rule … (174) E.L.T. 289 (S.C.); Commissioner of Customs, Indore v. Hindustan Motors Limited 2003 (156) E.L.T. 155 (Tri.-Del.); HMM. Ltd. v. Collector 1996 (87) E.L.T. 593 … covered by Entry 344 of CTH No. 8703 (1) of Notification No. 21/2002-Cus., dated March 1, 2002 as amended by Notification No. 11/2005-Cus., dated 1-3-2005? 3. The technical aspect involved in the above question, is whether car … Notification No. 21/2002-Cus., dated March 1, 2002 as amended by Notification No. 11/2005-Cus., dated 1-3-2005? 3. The technical aspect involved in the above question, is