Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: customs tariff amendment act 2003 section 3 · Page 1 of about 541 results (0.082 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 21 2005

J.K. Industries Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Apr-21-2005

Subject : Customs

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Sections 3, 8C, 9 and 9A to 9C; Customs Tariff (Amendment) Act, 1982; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 12, 15, 46, 58, 68, 72 and 129; Indian Tariff Act, 1934; Finance Act, 2003 - Sections 8B, 8C, 8(8) and 15(1); Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI), 2002; Finance Act, 2000 - Sections 9AA; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 34; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 148; Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995 - Rules 2, 3, 4, 5 to 17, 18, 19 and 20; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 136, 226, 227, 229 and 265

Reported in : 2005(103)ECC152; 2005(186)ELT3(Raj)

submitted a written application before the Designated Authority appointed by the Central Government under Rule 3 of the Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995 (hereinafter … bonded warehouse without payment of Duty, when the goods were removed. Since amendment, the rate of duty and tariff evaluation of such goods removed to … competent authority before goods are cleared from warehouse under Section 68.35. Until Section 15(1)(b) was amended vide Finance Act, 2003, the rate of duty and valuation of tariff was to be done as per the date on which

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 16 2009

Hero Cycles Limited, Under the Companies Act, 1956 Vs. the Union of In ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-16-2009

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Sections 3; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 154; Central Excise Act - Sections 5A; Central Excise Rules - Rule 8

Reported in : 2009(5)BomCR128; 2009(111)BomLR2490; 2009(166)LC228(Bombay); 2009(240)ELT490(Bom)

from payment of Central Excise duty and consequently no additional duty of customs under Section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 is payable on the goods. The Petitioners however, contended that inadvertently and under a bona fide … Excise Tariff Act, 1985. In terms of Sr. No. 25 of the Notification No. 10/2003-CE dated 01.02.2003 as amended by Notification No. 43/2006-CE dated 30.12.2006, the goods imported by the Petitioners are fully exempt from payment of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 14 2012

Eco Valley Farms and Foods Limited Vs. the Commissioner of Central Exc ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-14-2012

Subject : Excise

allowed without demanding excise duty equivalent to customs duty payable on imported mushrooms. 10. By the Central Excise Tariff (Amendment) Act 2004 ('2004 Act'), the six digit entries in the Schedule to the 1985 Act were rearranged into eight … Development Commissioner, by availing exemption under Exemption Notification No.13/81-cus dated 9th February 1981 / 53/03-cus dated 31st March 2003 or 53/97-cus dated 3rd June 1997, as the case may be. Alternatively, the assessee could procure indigenous capital … (A) holds that if the excise duty payable on fresh mushrooms under Section 3(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with the Schedule to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 02 2012

Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-i Vs. Joint Secretary(Revisionar ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-02-2012

Subject : Excise

CVD is imposed when import is made under the Customs Act, 1962 read with Section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. 4. Section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 reads as under: “3. Levy of additional … section 136 of the Finance Act, 2001 (14 of 2001), as amended by Section 169 of the Finance Act, 2003 (32 of 2003) and further amended by Section 3 of the Finance Act, 2004 (13 of 2004); (e) … of the duties entitled to rebate. It is submitted that the aforesaid amendment is not retrospective or clarificatory in nature and is accordingly prospective and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 06 2004

Vazir Polymers Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Feb-06-2004

Subject : Customs

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 5A; Customs Act, 1962 ; Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Sections 3; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 ; Customs and Central Excises Laws (Amendment) Act, 1988 - Sections 5A(1) and 5A(2)

Reported in : (2004)2GLR1338

the like goods imported into India and also the Additional Customs Duty (CVD - Countervailing Duty) under the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 leviable on like goods imported into India. Such Additional Customs Duty is leviable at the rates … ... ...Section 5A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was inserted by the Customs & Central Excises Laws (Amendment) Act, 1988 with effect from 1.7.1988.Sec.5A - Power to grant exemption from duty of excise.- If the Central Government … to be made on payment of customs duties and excise duties in accordance with the provisions of law.3. Section 3 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') provides for levy and collection of … Calcutta High Court in Sukhi India Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India, 2003 (156) ELT 35 wherein the same notification i.e. notification No.48/2001 dated 10.10.2001

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 01 2006

Tonira Pharma Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-01-2006

Subject : Service Tax

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 15 2010

C.C.E.C and St, Vishakhapatnam. Vs. Jocil Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-15-2010

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Tariff Act, 1975; Customs Act, 1962. - Section 28; Constitution Of India - Article 136

Six-digit First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 was substituted by the Eight-digit First Schedule vide the Customs Tariff (Amendment) Ordinance, 2003 and this substitution w.e.f. 01.02.2003 has statutory force. Therefore, the new Schedule would operate over and … 90 90 or as "RBD Palm Stearin" falling under Tariff Item No. 38 23 11 12 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975.2. The brief facts … We also find that Rule 1 of the General Rules of Interpretation specifically state that "the titles of Sections, Chapters and sub-Chapters are provided for ease of reference only; for legal purposes, classification shall be determined according

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 17 2009

Maruti Suzuki Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-iii

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-17-2009

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; CENVAT Credit Rules, 2002 - Rules 2, 3(1), 6, 6(1) and 14; Additional Duties of Excise (Textile and Textile Articles) Act, 1978 - Sections 3, 3(2), 4 and 4(2); Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957 - Sections 3; Finance Act, 2001 - Sections 65, 66 and 136; Provisional Collection of Taxes Act, 1931; Finance Act, 2003 - Sections 157; Customs Tariff Act - Sections 3; Provisional Collection of Taxes Act, 1931; Finance (No. 2) Act, 2004 - Sections 91, 93, 95; Central Excise Rules, 2000 - Rules 3(1), 7, 9 and 16(2); CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004

Reported in : 2009(168)LC87(SC); 2009(240)ELT641(SC); JT2009(11)SC8; 2009(11)SCALE446; (2009)9SCC193; [2009]18STJ323(SC); [2009]22STT54; 2009(7)LC3257(SC)

1931 (16 of 1931), the force of law; vi. the additional duty leviable under Section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act, equivalent to the excise specified under Clauses (i), (ii), (iii), (iv) and (v) above; andvii. the additional … (iii), (iv) and (v) above; andvii. the additional duty of excise leviable under Section 157 of the Finance Act, 2003 (32 of 2003), paid on any inputs or capital goods received in the factory on or after the … price.21. Before concluding, it may be clarified that on account of repeated amendments in the CENVAT Credit Rules, huge litigation in the country stands generated.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 07 2005

Compack Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Vadodara

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-07-2005

Subject : Excise

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Sections 3; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 25(1); Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 8(1) 56A, 57A and 57G

Reported in : AIR2006SC141; 2005(103)ECC1; 2005(189)ELT3(SC); JT2005(12)SC435; 2005(8)SCALE435; (2005)8SCC300

to the condition that the appropriate duty of excise or additional duty leviable under section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975), as the case may be, has already been paid in respect of the … S.B. Sinha, J.1. Interpretation of an exemption notification dated 28.02.1982, as amended by several notifications, is in question in this appeal which arises out of a judgment and order dated … liberally. [See Commissioner of Central Excise v. M.P.V. & Engg. Industries, : 2003(153)ELT485(SC) ].Bhalla Enterprises (supra) laid down a proposition that notification has to be

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 28 2023

Union Of India Vs. Cosmo Films Limited

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-28-2023

Subject : Land Acquisition

of 2018. 2 Paragraph 4.13 of FTP, read with the HBP. 3 Leviable under Section 3(7) of The Customs Tariff Act, 1975. 4 Leviable under Section 3(9) of The Customs Tariff Act, 1975. 5 Paragraph 4.03 of FTP. … scheme except for inputs listed in Schedule 4 of Central Excise Act, 1944 read with The Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act 2017 No 18 of 2017, with effect from July l, 2017. RAs are directed not to issue ARO … in existence under different paragraphs in different policy periods for years. Since 2003, all drug companies had been importing their raw materials sourced from unregistered

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial