Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: customs tariff amendment act 2003 chapter xxvi · Page 1 of about 120 results (0.042 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 15 2010

C.C.E.C and St, Vishakhapatnam. Vs. Jocil Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-15-2010

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Tariff Act, 1975; Customs Act, 1962. - Section 28; Constitution Of India - Article 136

Six-digit First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 was substituted by the Eight-digit First Schedule vide the Customs Tariff (Amendment) Ordinance, 2003 and this substitution w.e.f. 01.02.2003 has statutory force. Therefore, the new Schedule would operate over and … nothing but triglycerides. According to the Central Revenue Chemical Laboratory (CRCL) opinion which was relied upon by CESTAT, Chapter 15.11 covers palm oil and its fractions - this view is also espoused in the HSN Explanatory Notes. … classification in question, was imported through Kakinada port during the period from 26.08.2003 to 28.12.2004. Whereas the Respondent-assessee sought to classify the goods in question

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 01 2006

Tonira Pharma Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-01-2006

Subject : Service Tax

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 10 2019

Mahindra Electric Mobility Limited and Anr. Vs.cci and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-10-2019

Subject : MRTP

Manufacturers Association v. The Designated Authority &Ors(2011) 2 SCC258 the issue was that one Designated Authority under the Customs Tariff Act heard the parties; he was transferred; another official took charge. He issued notice to the parties and … outweighed by three bureaucrats. W.P.(C) 11467/2018 & connected matters Page 109 of 152 14. On 03.01.2018, the Companies Amendment Act, 2017 was brought into force by which Section 412 of the Companies Act, 2013 was amended as follows:412. … characterised as constitutionally inappropriate, because our Constitution does not provide, as does Chapter III of the Australian Constitution, that judicial power can be conferred only … Tribunal - by virtue of Section 30 is the appellate tribunal constituted under Section 110-111 of the Electricity Act 2003.By Section 30(2), the Central Government can, in addition to the other members of the Electricity Tribunal, appoint technical … between the entity or any other person. Section 26 outlines the power of investigation to aid the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 28 2023

Union Of India Vs. Cosmo Films Limited

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-28-2023

Subject : Land Acquisition

of 2018. 2 Paragraph 4.13 of FTP, read with the HBP. 3 Leviable under Section 3(7) of The Customs Tariff Act, 1975. 4 Leviable under Section 3(9) of The Customs Tariff Act, 1975. 5 Paragraph 4.03 of FTP. … scheme except for inputs listed in Schedule 4 of Central Excise Act, 1944 read with The Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act 2017 No 18 of 2017, with effect from July l, 2017. RAs are directed not to issue ARO … in existence under different paragraphs in different policy periods for years. Since 2003, all drug companies had been importing their raw materials sourced from unregistered … framed thereunder, the Director General of Foreign Trade (“DGFT”) notified the HBP, chapter 4 of which prescribed the procedure for availing duty exemption / remission … subordinate retrospective legislation. V. Contentions of the Respondent-Exporters 26. Ms. Meenakshi Arora, learned senior counsel, argued that

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 15 2009

Mso Alliance, Industrial Area, Delhi and Others Versus Telecom Regulat ...

Court : Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal TDSAT

Decided on : Jan-15-2009

Subject : MRTP

of the explanatory memorandum that it is the same increase 'allowed' (not fixed) by the Authority vide its Tariff Amendment Order dated 29.11.2005. A perusal of the explanatory memorandum to the Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable) Services (Second) Tariff … 656]; Indo-China Steam Navigation Company Ltd V. Jasjit Singh, Additional Collector of Customs, Calcutta and others [AIR 1964 Supreme Court 1140]. 22. Mr. Dwivedi also … of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997 as amended by the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (Amendment) Act, 2000 defines ' telecommunication service' as follows: “‘telecommunication service’ means service of any description (including electronic mail, voicemail, … the other by virtue of the written/oral agreement prevalent on 26th December 2003. The principle applicable in the written/oral agreement prevalent on 26th December 2003 … reasonable man could come to that conclusion. ….. Chapter IV containing Section 14 was inserted by an … Broadcasters, and MSOs to Broadcasters, prevalent as on 26.12.2003 shall be the ceiling with respect to both

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 03 2012

Bharat Forge Ltd. and Others Vs. Commissioner of Customs (Export) Nhav ...

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : May-03-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

product under export was steering knuckles, a sub-assembly of motor-vehicle part, falling under heading No. 87.08 of the Customs Tariff. There was no All-Industry Rate of Drawback available for ‘steering knuckle’ under any sub-serial no. under Chapter 87 … claim for all-industry rate of drawback under Section 75 of the Customs Act, 1962. Detailed enquiries conducted with the exporter revealed that the goods under … Nos.73.30 and 73.29 of the drawback schedule at the rates specified under notification No.33/02-Cus (NT) dated 29/05/2002 as amended and 26/2003 (Cus) (NT) dated 01/04/2003 under claim for all-industry rate of drawback under Section 75 of the … the rates specified under notification No.33/02-Cus (NT) dated 29/05/2002 as amended and 26/2003 (Cus) (NT) dated 01/04/2003 under claim for all-industry rate of drawback under

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 14 2012

Eco Valley Farms and Foods Limited Vs. the Commissioner of Central Exc ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-14-2012

Subject : Excise

allowed without demanding excise duty equivalent to customs duty payable on imported mushrooms. 10. By the Central Excise Tariff (Amendment) Act 2004 ('2004 Act'), the six digit entries in the Schedule to the 1985 Act were rearranged into eight … Development Commissioner, by availing exemption under Exemption Notification No.13/81-cus dated 9th February 1981 / 53/03-cus dated 31st March 2003 or 53/97-cus dated 3rd June 1997, as the case may be. Alternatively, the assessee could procure indigenous capital … to 30th November 1999 on the ground that fresh mushrooms classifiable under Chapter 7 heading No.0701.00 were liable to pay Nil rate of duty under … after the amendment of the 1985 Act by the 2004 Act ? 26. It is well established principle of judicial discipline that the orders passed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 05 2024

Nabha Power Limited Vs. Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-05-2024

Subject : Land Acquisition

case may be, and falling within the Chapter, heading or sub- heading of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975) as are specified in the corresponding entry in column (2) of the said … the earliest to facilitate processing of the Mega Power Policy case(s).” F) Amendment to the Customs Notification dated 11.12.2009 11. Thereafter, on 11.12.2009, an amendment … (RFP). The RFP was for selection of developers through tariff-based bidding process under Section 63 of the Electricity Act 2003, for procurement of power on long-term basis from the power station to be set up at village Nalash, … was considered as the relevant date for change in law and only 26.07.2013 which was the date on which the Office Memorandum was issued providing

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 06 2004

Vazir Polymers Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Feb-06-2004

Subject : Customs

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 5A; Customs Act, 1962 ; Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Sections 3; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 ; Customs and Central Excises Laws (Amendment) Act, 1988 - Sections 5A(1) and 5A(2)

Reported in : (2004)2GLR1338

the like goods imported into India and also the Additional Customs Duty (CVD - Countervailing Duty) under the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 leviable on like goods imported into India. Such Additional Customs Duty is leviable at the rates … ... ...Section 5A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was inserted by the Customs & Central Excises Laws (Amendment) Act, 1988 with effect from 1.7.1988.Sec.5A - Power to grant exemption from duty of excise.- If the Central Government … regenerated polymers out of scrap or waste of goods falling within various Chapters including Chapter 39 of the Central Excise Tariff. Ordinarily, the units permitted … Calcutta High Court in Sukhi India Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India, 2003 (156) ELT 35 wherein the same notification i.e. notification No.48/2001 dated 10.10.2001 … of India and other cases, 2001 (134) ELT 26 that the exemption under the above notifications was

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 08 2014

Hindal Co Industries Limited Vs. The Union of India

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-08-2014

Subject : Excise

3 SCC 620. This was a case of levy of additional customs duty under Section 3(1) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. This duty is leviable in addition to the customs duty under Section 12 of the Customs … Petitioner is engaged in the manufacturing of aluminum sheets, foils falling under Chapter sub -heading 76071190 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The major … in : 1995 (77) E. L. T 268 (SC) are nullified with the change in law. With the amendment in section 2(d) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, the produce aluminium dross and skimming are deemed to … of Union of India vs. Ahmedabad Electricity Co. Ltd. reported in : 2003 (158) E. L. T 3 (SC), took the same view. Mr. Sridharan … in Permanent Edition of Words and Phrases, Vol. 26, from an American Judgment. The passage runs thus

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial