Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: customs tariff amendment act 2003 chapter xli · Page 1 of about 36 results (0.075 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 01 2006

Tonira Pharma Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-01-2006

Subject : Service Tax

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 10 2019

Mahindra Electric Mobility Limited and Anr. Vs.cci and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-10-2019

Subject : MRTP

Manufacturers Association v. The Designated Authority &Ors(2011) 2 SCC258 the issue was that one Designated Authority under the Customs Tariff Act heard the parties; he was transferred; another official took charge. He issued notice to the parties and … outweighed by three bureaucrats. W.P.(C) 11467/2018 & connected matters Page 109 of 152 14. On 03.01.2018, the Companies Amendment Act, 2017 was brought into force by which Section 412 of the Companies Act, 2013 was amended as follows:412. … characterised as constitutionally inappropriate, because our Constitution does not provide, as does Chapter III of the Australian Constitution, that judicial power can be conferred only … Tribunal - by virtue of Section 30 is the appellate tribunal constituted under Section 110-111 of the Electricity Act 2003.By Section 30(2), the Central Government can, in addition to the other members of the Electricity Tribunal, appoint technical … 04.05.2011 under Section 36 (2) read with Section 41 (2) of the Act, seeking detailed information and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 28 2023

Union Of India Vs. Cosmo Films Limited

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-28-2023

Subject : Land Acquisition

of 2018. 2 Paragraph 4.13 of FTP, read with the HBP. 3 Leviable under Section 3(7) of The Customs Tariff Act, 1975. 4 Leviable under Section 3(9) of The Customs Tariff Act, 1975. 5 Paragraph 4.03 of FTP. … scheme except for inputs listed in Schedule 4 of Central Excise Act, 1944 read with The Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act 2017 No 18 of 2017, with effect from July l, 2017. RAs are directed not to issue ARO … in existence under different paragraphs in different policy periods for years. Since 2003, all drug companies had been importing their raw materials sourced from unregistered … framed thereunder, the Director General of Foreign Trade (“DGFT”) notified the HBP, chapter 4 of which prescribed the procedure for availing duty exemption / remission … as per paragraph 4.07 of Handbook of Procedures."28 41. The other relevant provisions of the FTP for

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 15 2009

Mso Alliance, Industrial Area, Delhi and Others Versus Telecom Regulat ...

Court : Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal TDSAT

Decided on : Jan-15-2009

Subject : MRTP

of the explanatory memorandum that it is the same increase 'allowed' (not fixed) by the Authority vide its Tariff Amendment Order dated 29.11.2005. A perusal of the explanatory memorandum to the Telecommunication (Broadcasting and Cable) Services (Second) Tariff … 656]; Indo-China Steam Navigation Company Ltd V. Jasjit Singh, Additional Collector of Customs, Calcutta and others [AIR 1964 Supreme Court 1140]. 22. Mr. Dwivedi also … of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997 as amended by the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (Amendment) Act, 2000 defines ' telecommunication service' as follows: “‘telecommunication service’ means service of any description (including electronic mail, voicemail, … the other by virtue of the written/oral agreement prevalent on 26th December 2003. The principle applicable in the written/oral agreement prevalent on 26th December 2003 … reasonable man could come to that conclusion. ….. Chapter IV containing Section 14 was inserted by an … TRAI Act, has been violated by the Authority. 41. We now come to the question whether, as

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 19 2005

H and R Jhonson (India) Ltd. Vs. Designated Authority Ministry of

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : May-19-2005

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2005)(185)ELT125TriDel

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 24 2009

Sravani Impex Pvt. Ltd. Rep. by Its Director, M. Ranga Rao and anr. Vs ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-24-2009

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 - Sections 2, 3, 3(2), 3(3), 5, 6, 6(1), 9(2), 9(4), 11, 11(2), 11(5) and 12; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 2(16), 2(19), 2(22), 2(33), 2(37), 2(41), 11, 11(1), 14, 14(1), 14(2), 25, 25(1), 28, 28(1), 28(1A), 28(2), 28AB, 50, 50(2), 51, 111, 112, 113, 114, 114A, 120 and 135; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act - Sections 18; Customs Tariff Act, 1975; Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 - Sections 7(1); Foreign Trade Rules, 1993 - Rule 2; Foreign Exchange Management (Export of Goods and Services) Regulations, 2000 - Regulation 3(1)

Reported in : 2009(6)ALT749

goods. Section 14 relates to 'valuation of goods' and, under Sub-section (1) thereof, for the purpose of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 or any other law for the time being in force, the value of export goods shall … which fell for consideration was whether, in respect of export of articles of Polypropylene effected prior to the amendment of the public notice on 15.12.1999, the Customs authorities were justified in holding that, as it was not … (Union of India v. Hindalco Industries : (2003) 5 SCC 194 : 2003 (5) ALT 10.1; 12.3 (DNSC)). It would, ordinarily, not be proper or … authorities were justified in holding that, as it was not covered under Chapter 39 of the ITC classification, the petitioners were not eligible for benefits

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 22 2006

Reliance Energy Limited Vs. the Tata Power Company Limited and

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Decided on : May-22-2006

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (2006)LCAPTEL662

(i) On and after 1^st January, 1997 only Tata Power had introduced Tariff for its retail consumers. At no point of time earlier to 1^st … Electricity Board.34. Clause 5 of the earlier Licenses have been substituted by amendment with respect to purposes of supply and it proceeds thus: (i) Subject … engaging to a consultancy firm to study the issues relating to Sections 14 and 42 of the Electricity Act, 2003 or from taking further action in terms of directions contained in the Paragraphs 81.12 and 81.14 of the … issue or renew of License in terms of Chapter III of the rules. According to Chapter III … restraint Order against Tata Powers on its complaint that Tata Power is trying to snatch away its retail customers? (viii) To what relief Tata Power is entitled to in Appeal No. 43 of 2005? 13. REL initiated

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 18 2010

Shri Pradeep Khanna, M/S. Sound Tarrific and Another Vs. Cc (iandg), N ...

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Feb-18-2010

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 16 2013

M/S Integrated Finance Co.Ltd. Vs. Reserve Bank of India Etc.Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-16-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

aforesaid case, this Court upon a comprehensive analysis of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 and Customs Tariff Act, 1975 concluded that the said two Acts substantially operate in different fields and, therefore, the provisions of … Ors.[10].26. It was further argued by Mr. Chagla that Part IIIB was introduced in the RBI Act by Amendment Act of 1963. The Statement of Objects and Reasons of the said Amendment Act indicates that it was not … of its reported owned fund of Rs.2877.00 lakh as on September 30, 2003. Thus, it violated the provisions of Para 12 of the NBFC Prudential … and Section 402 of the Companies Act, Mr. Divan has submitted that Chapter V of the Companies Act provides another statutory method of varying contracts. … the debenture holders, the financial institutions, who had 41% shares in TOMCO, have supported the Scheme and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 10 2005

Raymond Limited Vs. Cce and C

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : May-10-2005

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2005)(101)ECC553

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial