Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: customs tariff amendment act 2003 chapter vii · Page 1 of about 238 results (0.058 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 15 2010

C.C.E.C and St, Vishakhapatnam. Vs. Jocil Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-15-2010

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Tariff Act, 1975; Customs Act, 1962. - Section 28; Constitution Of India - Article 136

Six-digit First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 was substituted by the Eight-digit First Schedule vide the Customs Tariff (Amendment) Ordinance, 2003 and this substitution w.e.f. 01.02.2003 has statutory force. Therefore, the new Schedule would operate over and … nothing but triglycerides. According to the Central Revenue Chemical Laboratory (CRCL) opinion which was relied upon by CESTAT, Chapter 15.11 covers palm oil and its fractions - this view is also espoused in the HSN Explanatory Notes.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 14 2012

Eco Valley Farms and Foods Limited Vs. the Commissioner of Central Exc ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-14-2012

Subject : Excise

allowed without demanding excise duty equivalent to customs duty payable on imported mushrooms. 10. By the Central Excise Tariff (Amendment) Act 2004 ('2004 Act'), the six digit entries in the Schedule to the 1985 Act were rearranged into eight … imported articles is prescribed under the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 ('1975 Act'). 7. During the period from April 1997 to December 1998 no excise duty … Development Commissioner, by availing exemption under Exemption Notification No.13/81-cus dated 9th February 1981 / 53/03-cus dated 31st March 2003 or 53/97-cus dated 3rd June 1997, as the case may be. Alternatively, the assessee could procure indigenous capital … to 30th November 1999 on the ground that fresh mushrooms classifiable under Chapter 7 heading No.0701.00 were liable to pay Nil rate of duty under

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 16 2004

Firma Chemiczna Dwory S.A. Vs. Ministry of Finance, Designated

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Jan-16-2004

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (2004)(93)ECC432

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 06 2004

Vazir Polymers Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Feb-06-2004

Subject : Customs

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 5A; Customs Act, 1962 ; Customs Tariff Act, 1975 - Sections 3; Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 ; Customs and Central Excises Laws (Amendment) Act, 1988 - Sections 5A(1) and 5A(2)

Reported in : (2004)2GLR1338

the like goods imported into India and also the Additional Customs Duty (CVD - Countervailing Duty) under the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 leviable on like goods imported into India. Such Additional Customs Duty is leviable at the rates … ... ...Section 5A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was inserted by the Customs & Central Excises Laws (Amendment) Act, 1988 with effect from 1.7.1988.Sec.5A - Power to grant exemption from duty of excise.- If the Central Government … regenerated polymers out of scrap or waste of goods falling within various Chapters including Chapter 39 of the Central Excise Tariff. Ordinarily, the units permitted … Calcutta High Court in Sukhi India Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India, 2003 (156) ELT 35 wherein the same notification i.e. notification No.48/2001 dated 10.10.2001 … like units from payment of additional customs duty. 7. The petitioners and other like units again filed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 05 2024

Nabha Power Limited Vs. Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-05-2024

Subject : Land Acquisition

case may be, and falling within the Chapter, heading or sub- heading of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975) as are specified in the corresponding entry in column (2) of the said … the earliest to facilitate processing of the Mega Power Policy case(s).” F) Amendment to the Customs Notification dated 11.12.2009 11. Thereafter, on 11.12.2009, an amendment … (RFP). The RFP was for selection of developers through tariff-based bidding process under Section 63 of the Electricity Act 2003, for procurement of power on long-term basis from the power station to be set up at village Nalash, … fully investigated and considered while submitting the Bid.” Press Release of 1.10.2009 7. When the matter stood thus, a Press Release was issued by the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 08 2014

Indian Hotels and Restaurant Association Represented by Its Treasurer ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-08-2014

Subject : Service Tax

which have been extensively referred in the Petition, reveals that the Parliament may have by the Constitution (Eighty-eighth Amendment) Act, 2003 inserted Entry-92C in List-I relating to œTaxes on services? from the date to be notified. However, no such … the Central Government by the Finance Act, 2011 made an amendment to Chapter V of the Finance Act 1994, relating to service tax, inserting sub-clause … clause 105 of Section 65 of the Finance Act, when the declared tariff for providing of such accommodation is less than Rs. 1,000/per day from … food served in restaurants could not be levied on the sum total of the price charged to the customer. The, restaurants provide services in addition to food, and these had to be accounted for. Thus, restaurants provided … P5 came into force with effect from 01.05.2011. 7. It is stated by the Petitioners that the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 01 2006

Tonira Pharma Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-01-2006

Subject : Service Tax

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 03 2023

Commissioner Of Customs Central Excise And Service Tax Hyderabad Vs. A ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-03-2023

Subject : Land Acquisition

the product in question, known as “Aswini Homeo Arnica Hair Oil”4 could not be classified as ‘medicament’ under Tariff Item 3003 90 14 or under any item stated in Chapter 30 of the First Schedule to the … the issue. The Adjudicating Authority expressed the view that because of material amendment of the tariff entries in Chapters 30 and 33 in the year … in Chapter 30 of the First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 19855-6; and that the product in question, being “Hair oil”, was required … REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.9525 OF2018COMMISSSIONER OF CUSTOMS, CENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX, HYDERABAD …APPELLANT VERSUS ASHWANI HOMEO PHARMACY …RESPONDENT JUDGMENT DINESH MAHESHWARI, J.Table of Contents … Naturence Research Labs (P) LTD. Vs. CCE, DELHI-II. 2003 (154) E.L.T. 672 (Tri.-.Del.) is not correct as … to the Act of 1985’, unless indicated otherwise. 7 Hereinafter also referred to as ‘the Act of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 17 2009

Maruti Suzuki Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-iii

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-17-2009

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; CENVAT Credit Rules, 2002 - Rules 2, 3(1), 6, 6(1) and 14; Additional Duties of Excise (Textile and Textile Articles) Act, 1978 - Sections 3, 3(2), 4 and 4(2); Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957 - Sections 3; Finance Act, 2001 - Sections 65, 66 and 136; Provisional Collection of Taxes Act, 1931; Finance Act, 2003 - Sections 157; Customs Tariff Act - Sections 3; Provisional Collection of Taxes Act, 1931; Finance (No. 2) Act, 2004 - Sections 91, 93, 95; Central Excise Rules, 2000 - Rules 3(1), 7, 9 and 16(2); CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004

Reported in : 2009(168)LC87(SC); 2009(240)ELT641(SC); JT2009(11)SC8; 2009(11)SCALE446; (2009)9SCC193; [2009]18STJ323(SC); [2009]22STT54; 2009(7)LC3257(SC)

1931 (16 of 1931), the force of law; vi. the additional duty leviable under Section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act, equivalent to the excise specified under Clauses (i), (ii), (iii), (iv) and (v) above; andvii. the additional … (appellant) is engaged in the business of manufacturing motor vehicles falling under Chapter 87 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. These motor vehicles are cleared … (iii), (iv) and (v) above; andvii. the additional duty of excise leviable under Section 157 of the Finance Act, 2003 (32 of 2003), paid on any inputs or capital goods received in the factory on or after the … price.21. Before concluding, it may be clarified that on account of repeated amendments in the CENVAT Credit Rules, huge litigation in the country stands generated. … cover of an invoice referred to in Rule 7.4A. Notwithstanding anything contained in these rules,-(a) a first

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 03 2012

Bharat Forge Ltd. and Others Vs. Commissioner of Customs (Export) Nhav ...

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : May-03-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

product under export was steering knuckles, a sub-assembly of motor-vehicle part, falling under heading No. 87.08 of the Customs Tariff. There was no All-Industry Rate of Drawback available for ‘steering knuckle’ under any sub-serial no. under Chapter 87 … claim for all-industry rate of drawback under Section 75 of the Customs Act, 1962. Detailed enquiries conducted with the exporter revealed that the goods under … Nos.73.30 and 73.29 of the drawback schedule at the rates specified under notification No.33/02-Cus (NT) dated 29/05/2002 as amended and 26/2003 (Cus) (NT) dated 01/04/2003 under claim for all-industry rate of drawback under Section 75 of the … submissions: 3.1. During the period 6-3-03 to 15-5-03, the appellant had exported 7 types of items, namely,:- a) Machined Crankshaft; b) Forged Crankshaft; c) Steering

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial