Advanced Search Results

C.C.E.C and St, Vishakhapatnam. Vs. Jocil Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Tariff Act, 1975; Customs Act, 1962. - Section 28; Constitution Of India - Article 136

Six-digit First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 was substituted by the Eight-digit First Schedule vide the Customs Tariff (Amendment) Ordinance, 2003 and this substitution w.e.f. 01.02.2003 has statutory force. Therefore, the new Schedule would operate over and … nothing but triglycerides. According to the Central Revenue Chemical Laboratory (CRCL) opinion which was relied upon by CESTAT, Chapter 15.11 covers palm oil and its fractions - this view is also espoused in the HSN Explanatory Notes. … differential duty, under S.28 of the Customs Act, 1962.3. The Chemical Examiner, Visakhapatnam reported that the goods in question were RBD Palm Stearin with an

Mahindra Electric Mobility Limited and Anr. Vs.cci and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : MRTP

Manufacturers Association v. The Designated Authority &Ors(2011) 2 SCC258 the issue was that one Designated Authority under the Customs Tariff Act heard the parties; he was transferred; another official took charge. He issued notice to the parties and … and before the report is submitted to the CCI, a lesser penalty under Section 46 can be issued. Chapter VI of the Act deals with various kinds of penalties, such as contravention of the CCI‟s order (Section 42); … outweighed by three bureaucrats. W.P.(C) 11467/2018 & connected matters Page 109 of 152 14. On 03.01.2018, the Companies Amendment Act, 2017 was brought into force by which Section 412 of the Companies Act, 2013 was amended as follows:412. … Tribunal - by virtue of Section 30 is the appellate tribunal constituted under Section 110-111 of the Electricity Act 2003.By Section 30(2), the Central Government can, in addition to the other members of the Electricity Tribunal, appoint technical

Firma Chemiczna Dwory S.A. Vs. Ministry of Finance, Designated

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (2004)(93)ECC432

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Indian Hotels and Restaurant Association Represented by Its Treasurer ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

which have been extensively referred in the Petition, reveals that the Parliament may have by the Constitution (Eighty-eighth Amendment) Act, 2003 inserted Entry-92C in List-I relating to œTaxes on services? from the date to be notified. However, no such … the Central Government by the Finance Act, 2011 made an amendment to Chapter V of the Finance Act 1994, relating to service tax, inserting sub-clause … clause 105 of Section 65 of the Finance Act, when the declared tariff for providing of such accommodation is less than Rs. 1,000/per day from … food served in restaurants could not be levied on the sum total of the price charged to the customer. The, restaurants provide services in addition to food, and these had to be accounted for. Thus, restaurants provided … that the said provision be struck down as violative of the mandate of Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 245,

Tonira Pharma Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Service Tax

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Commissioner Of Customs Central Excise And Service Tax Hyderabad Vs. A ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

the product in question, known as “Aswini Homeo Arnica Hair Oil”4 could not be classified as ‘medicament’ under Tariff Item 3003 90 14 or under any item stated in Chapter 30 of the First Schedule to the … the issue. The Adjudicating Authority expressed the view that because of material amendment of the tariff entries in Chapters 30 and 33 in the year … in Chapter 30 of the First Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 19855-6; and that the product in question, being “Hair oil”, was required … re-examining the issue. The Adjudicating Authority expressed the view that because of material amendment of the tariff … REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.9525 OF2018COMMISSSIONER OF CUSTOMS, CENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX, HYDERABAD …APPELLANT VERSUS ASHWANI HOMEO PHARMACY …RESPONDENT JUDGMENT DINESH MAHESHWARI, J.Table of Contents … Naturence Research Labs (P) LTD. Vs. CCE, DELHI-II. 2003 (154) E.L.T. 672 (Tri.-.Del.) is not correct as

Eco Valley Farms and Foods Limited Vs. the Commissioner of Central Exc ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Excise

allowed without demanding excise duty equivalent to customs duty payable on imported mushrooms. 10. By the Central Excise Tariff (Amendment) Act 2004 ('2004 Act'), the six digit entries in the Schedule to the 1985 Act were rearranged into eight … Development Commissioner, by availing exemption under Exemption Notification No.13/81-cus dated 9th February 1981 / 53/03-cus dated 31st March 2003 or 53/97-cus dated 3rd June 1997, as the case may be. Alternatively, the assessee could procure indigenous capital … to 30th November 1999 on the ground that fresh mushrooms classifiable under Chapter 7 heading No.0701.00 were liable to pay Nil rate of duty under … appellant - assessee has raised several questions in this appeal, in our view, the question that really falls for consideration is this : “Once the

Maruti Suzuki Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-iii

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; CENVAT Credit Rules, 2002 - Rules 2, 3(1), 6, 6(1) and 14; Additional Duties of Excise (Textile and Textile Articles) Act, 1978 - Sections 3, 3(2), 4 and 4(2); Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957 - Sections 3; Finance Act, 2001 - Sections 65, 66 and 136; Provisional Collection of Taxes Act, 1931; Finance Act, 2003 - Sections 157; Customs Tariff Act - Sections 3; Provisional Collection of Taxes Act, 1931; Finance (No. 2) Act, 2004 - Sections 91, 93, 95; Central Excise Rules, 2000 - Rules 3(1), 7, 9 and 16(2); CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004

Reported in : 2009(168)LC87(SC); 2009(240)ELT641(SC); JT2009(11)SC8; 2009(11)SCALE446; (2009)9SCC193; [2009]18STJ323(SC); [2009]22STT54; 2009(7)LC3257(SC)

1931 (16 of 1931), the force of law; vi. the additional duty leviable under Section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act, equivalent to the excise specified under Clauses (i), (ii), (iii), (iv) and (v) above; andvii. the additional … (appellant) is engaged in the business of manufacturing motor vehicles falling under Chapter 87 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. These motor vehicles are cleared … (iii), (iv) and (v) above; andvii. the additional duty of excise leviable under Section 157 of the Finance Act, 2003 (32 of 2003), paid on any inputs or capital goods received in the factory on or after the … price.21. Before concluding, it may be clarified that on account of repeated amendments in the CENVAT Credit Rules, huge litigation in the country stands generated.

Union Of India Vs. Cosmo Films Limited

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

of 2018. 2 Paragraph 4.13 of FTP, read with the HBP. 3 Leviable under Section 3(7) of The Customs Tariff Act, 1975. 4 Leviable under Section 3(9) of The Customs Tariff Act, 1975. 5 Paragraph 4.03 of FTP. … scheme except for inputs listed in Schedule 4 of Central Excise Act, 1944 read with The Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act 2017 No 18 of 2017, with effect from July l, 2017. RAs are directed not to issue ARO … in existence under different paragraphs in different policy periods for years. Since 2003, all drug companies had been importing their raw materials sourced from unregistered … framed thereunder, the Director General of Foreign Trade (“DGFT”) notified the HBP, chapter 4 of which prescribed the procedure for availing duty exemption / remission … goods against AAs. The respondents were of the view that the scope of ‘pre-import condition’ was unclear,

Nabha Power Limited Vs. Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

case may be, and falling within the Chapter, heading or sub- heading of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (51 of 1975) as are specified in the corresponding entry in column (2) of the said … the earliest to facilitate processing of the Mega Power Policy case(s).” F) Amendment to the Customs Notification dated 11.12.2009 11. Thereafter, on 11.12.2009, an amendment … (RFP). The RFP was for selection of developers through tariff-based bidding process under Section 63 of the Electricity Act 2003, for procurement of power on long-term basis from the power station to be set up at village Nalash, … (s) Versus PUNJAB STATE POWER COROPORATION LIMITED & ANR. ...Respondent(s) JUDGMENT K.V. Viswanathan, J.1. The present appeal arises from the judgment dated 30.06.2014 of the