Advanced Search Results

Harsh International and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2007)(122)ECC193

and recommended provisional assessment of all exports of Vitrified/porcelain Tiles falling under chapter 69 of Gazette schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 made by … all exports of Vitrified/porcelain Tiles falling under chapter 69 of Gazette schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, … and hence provisional assessments made in the present case are non est in law. Section 9A(8) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 as amended by Section 89 of the Finance Act, 2000 reads as follows: (8) The provisions … tax payer and against the Revenue.The lacuna pointed out by the Supreme Court has been overcome by the amendment to Section 9A(8) in 2004, by specifically borrowing the provisions of Customs Act, relating to determination of rate … export to India were only during the period Nov. 2002 to March 2003, which is after the period of investigation considered while issuing Notification No.

H and R Jhonson (India) Ltd. Vs. Designated Authority Ministry of

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2005)(185)ELT125TriDel

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Nitco Tiles Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs (import)

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

shall be imposed on imports into India of subject goods falling under Chapter 69 of the first Schedule to the said Customs Tariff Act produced … be imposed on imports into India of subject goods falling under Chapter 69 of the first Schedule to the said Customs Tariff Act produced by … before the Deputy Commissioner that no anti dumping duty can be imposed in terms of Section 9A(1) the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 could be imposed on imports made by them from M/s.Nanhai, China, in view of the finding … dumping duty was leviable in respect of vitrified/porcelain tiles imported into India from M/s. Nanhai of China. The amendment was effective from 11-7-2003 i.e. from the date of issue of Notification No. 98/2003. On 6th March 2006

H. and R Johnson (India) Limited Vs. Designated Authority, Ministry

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2007)(116)ECC225

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Southern Iron and Steel Co. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2007)(118)ECC363

Matched in: Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Union Of India Vs. Cosmo Films Limited

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

of 2018. 2 Paragraph 4.13 of FTP, read with the HBP. 3 Leviable under Section 3(7) of The Customs Tariff Act, 1975. 4 Leviable under Section 3(9) of The Customs Tariff Act, 1975. 5 Paragraph 4.03 of FTP. … scheme except for inputs listed in Schedule 4 of Central Excise Act, 1944 read with The Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act 2017 No 18 of 2017, with effect from July l, 2017. RAs are directed not to issue ARO … in existence under different paragraphs in different policy periods for years. Since 2003, all drug companies had been importing their raw materials sourced from unregistered … framed thereunder, the Director General of Foreign Trade (“DGFT”) notified the HBP, chapter 4 of which prescribed the procedure for availing duty exemption / remission

M/S. Professional Copier Services India (Pvt) Ltd vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

had classified the machines under HSN Code 8443 3100, which falls under Chapter 84 of the Customs Tariff Act, which corresponds to Entry 69(22)(c)(i) of … as 'Digital Multifunctional Device' with HSN Code 8443 3100 under the provisions of the Customs Act, 1962 and Customs Tariff Act, 1975. The petitioners/purchasers - re-sellers followed the same classification adopted by the importer- seller while re-selling the … the "Multi-Function Printer" traded by the petitioner, falls under Entry 69(22)(c)(i) of the 3rd Schedule to the KVAT Act, 2003, attracting tax @ 4%; iii) declare that the Amendment vide Kerala Finance Act, 2014, brought u/s. 55, taking … declare that the "Multi-Function Printer" traded by the petitioner, falls under Entry 69(22)(c)(i) of the 3rd Schedule to the KVAT Act, 2003, attracting tax @

M/S.Euro Business System, Kannur vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

had classified the machines under HSN Code 8443 3100, which falls under Chapter 84 of the Customs Tariff Act, which corresponds to Entry 69(22)(c)(i) of … as 'Digital Multifunctional Device' with HSN Code 8443 3100 under the provisions of the Customs Act, 1962 and Customs Tariff Act, 1975. The petitioners/purchasers - re-sellers followed the same classification adopted by the importer- seller while re-selling the … the "Multi-Function Printer" traded by the petitioner, falls under Entry 69(22)(c)(i) of the 3rd Schedule to the KVAT Act, 2003, attracting tax @ 4%; iii) declare that the Amendment vide Kerala Finance Act, 2014, brought u/s. 55, taking … declare that the "Multi-Function Printer" traded by the petitioner, falls under Entry 69(22)(c)(i) of the 3rd Schedule to the KVAT Act, 2003, attracting tax @

M/S.Kyocera Document Solutions India Pvt. Ltd. vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

had classified the machines under HSN Code 8443 3100, which falls under Chapter 84 of the Customs Tariff Act, which corresponds to Entry 69(22)(c)(i) of … as 'Digital Multifunctional Device' with HSN Code 8443 3100 under the provisions of the Customs Act, 1962 and Customs Tariff Act, 1975. The petitioners/purchasers - re-sellers followed the same classification adopted by the importer- seller while re-selling the … the "Multi-Function Printer" traded by the petitioner, falls under Entry 69(22)(c)(i) of the 3rd Schedule to the KVAT Act, 2003, attracting tax @ 4%; iii) declare that the Amendment vide Kerala Finance Act, 2014, brought u/s. 55, taking … declare that the "Multi-Function Printer" traded by the petitioner, falls under Entry 69(22)(c)(i) of the 3rd Schedule to the KVAT Act, 2003, attracting tax @

M/S. Kyocera Document Solutions India Pvt. Ltd. vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

had classified the machines under HSN Code 8443 3100, which falls under Chapter 84 of the Customs Tariff Act, which corresponds to Entry 69(22)(c)(i) of … as 'Digital Multifunctional Device' with HSN Code 8443 3100 under the provisions of the Customs Act, 1962 and Customs Tariff Act, 1975. The petitioners/purchasers - re-sellers followed the same classification adopted by the importer- seller while re-selling the … the "Multi-Function Printer" traded by the petitioner, falls under Entry 69(22)(c)(i) of the 3rd Schedule to the KVAT Act, 2003, attracting tax @ 4%; iii) declare that the Amendment vide Kerala Finance Act, 2014, brought u/s. 55, taking … declare that the "Multi-Function Printer" traded by the petitioner, falls under Entry 69(22)(c)(i) of the 3rd Schedule to the KVAT Act, 2003, attracting tax @